| Literature DB >> 28788169 |
Stefano Besco1, Alberto Bosio2, Mariangela Brisotto3, Laura E Depero4, Alessandra Lorenzetti5, Elza Bontempi6, Renato Bonora7, Michele Modesti8.
Abstract
This paper reports the results on the use of an innovative inert, based on stabilized fly ash from municipal solid waste incineration as a filler for polypropylene. The starting material, which contains large quantities of leachable Pb and Zn, was stabilized by means of an innovative process using rice husk ash as a waste silica source, together with other fly ashes, such as coal fly ash and flue gas desulfurization residues. The use of all waste materials to obtain a new filler makes the proposed technology extremely sustainable and competitive. The new composites, obtained by using the stabilized material as a filler for polypropylene, were characterized and their mechanical properties were also investigated. A comparison with a traditional polypropylene and calcium carbonate based compound was also done. This research activity was realized in the frame of the COSMOS-RICE project, financed by the EU Commission.Entities:
Keywords: fly ash; melt compounding; polypropylene; rice husk ash; stabilization process
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788169 PMCID: PMC5456193 DOI: 10.3390/ma7085920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Calculated residue for the composites obtained by varying filler and processing conditions, measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at 800 °C (air) and considering pristine component values evaluated at the same temperature. PP-CR, Polypropylene-COSMOS-RICE; PP-C, Polypropylene-COSMOS; PP-CaCO3, Polypropylene-calcite.
Figure 2Particle size distribution for rice husk silica based (CR) sample determined by laser diffraction.
Figure 3Diffraction patterns collected from polypropylene (PP), PP-CaCO3 and PP-CR composites.
Figure 42D diffraction images collected from PP and PP-CR composites (varying CR content).
Tensile and flexural modulus, maximum stress (flexural), crystallization temperature behavior, deflection temperature under load (DTUL), and temperatures corresponding to the 50% of weight loss, for rice husk silica based (CR), colloidal silica based (C) and CaCO3 based composites varying processing conditions (the values are normalized in respect to the pristine polypropylene (PP)). A minimum of 5 specimens have been tested for each sample evaluating the average value and the experimental standard deviation (st. dev.).
| %Filler ( | Tensile modulus | Flexural modulus | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-CR | st. dev. | PP-C | st. dev. | PP-CaCO3 | st. dev. | PP-CR | st. dev. | PP-C | st. dev. | PP-CaCO3 | st. dev. | |
|
| 1.08 | 0.04 | 1.04 | 0.05 | - | - | 1.07 | 0.05 | 1.16 | 0.04 | - | - |
|
| 1.17 | 0.03 | - | - | - | - | 1.08 | 0.04 | - | - | - | |
|
| 1.27 | 0.03 | 1.41 | 0.09 | - | - | 1.36 | 0.06 | 1.29 | 0.08 | - | - |
|
| 1.39 | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | 1.40 | 0.08 | - | - | - | |
|
| 1.93 | 0.29 | 1.85 | 0.08 | - | - | 1.83 | 0.02 | 1.89 | 0.06 | - | - |
|
| 2.00 | 0.16 | 1.95 | 0.05 | 2.02 | 0.15 | 1.84 | 0.01 | 2.07 | 0.01 | 1.93 | 0.08 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.02 | 0.01 | 1.06 | 0.04 | - | - | 1.04 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.02 | - | - |
|
| 1.02 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | 1.03 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 1.11 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.01 | - | - | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 0.02 | - | - |
|
| 1.15 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | 1.05 | 0.00 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 1.17 | 0.01 | 1.11 | 0.01 | - | - | 1.09 | 0.01 | 1.06 | 0.02 | - | - |
|
| 1.18 | 0.01 | 1.44 | 0.04 | 1.12 | 0.01 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 0.02 | 1.03 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.10 | 0.03 | 1.07 | 0.02 | - | - | 1.07 | 0.01 | 1.02 | 0.01 | - | - |
|
| 1.15 | 0.03 | - | - | - | - | 1.09 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 1.21 | 0.03 | 1.11 | 0.03 | - | - | 1.12 | 0.02 | 1.05 | 0.01 | - | - |
|
| 1.19 | 0.03 | - | - | - | - | 1.12 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 1.37 | 0.04 | 1.31 | 0.04 | - | - | 1.16 | 0.01 | 1.07 | 0.01 | - | - |
|
| 1.36 | 0.04 | 1.36 | 0.04 | 1.25 | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.01 | 1.13 | 0.01 |
Figure 5Parameters reported in Table 1 for PP-CR samples. The values are normalized with respect to the pristine PP.
Figure 6Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis on cryofractured samples surfaces obtained with different fillers (30 wt% amount, 100 rpm).