| Literature DB >> 28788075 |
Hua Zhang1, Jing Zhang2,3, Ziluan Fan4, Xintao Zhou5,6, Lin Geng7, Zhenyu Wang8,9, Joe M Regenstein10, Zhiqiang Xia11,12.
Abstract
The effects of sulfation of yeast glucans was optimized using response surface methodology. The degree of sulfation was evaluated from 0.11 to 0.75 using ion-chromatography. The structural characteristics of SYG (sulfation of yeast glucans) with a DS = 0.75 were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography/gel-permeation chromatography and finally by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. The SYG had lower viscosity and greater solubility than the native yeast glucans, suggesting that the conformation of the SYG had significantly changed. The results also showed that SYG had a significantly greater antioxidant activity in vivo compared to native yeast glucans.Entities:
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; sulfated yeast glucans (SYG); yeast; yeast glucans (YG)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28788075 PMCID: PMC6152352 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22081266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Response surface plots. (a) Effect of the ratio of DMF (N,N-dimethyl formamide) and HClSO3 and reaction time on DS of SYG; (b) Effect of reaction temperature and reaction time on content of DS of SYG; (c) Effect of reaction temperature and ratio of DMF and HClSO3 on DS of SYG.
Three factor central composite design matrix and the response values for DS of SYG.
| Run | X1 Ratio of DMF and HClSO3 | X2 Temperature (°C) | X3 Time (h) | DS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 60 | 2.5 | 0.454 |
| 2 | 6 | 50 | 2.5 | 0.746 |
| 3 | 8 | 50 | 3 | 0.487 |
| 4 | 8 | 40 | 2.5 | 0.426 |
| 5 | 6 | 60 | 2 | 0.514 |
| 6 | 6 | 50 | 2.5 | 0.717 |
| 7 | 6 | 50 | 2.5 | 0.727 |
| 8 | 6 | 40 | 2 | 0.648 |
| 9 | 6 | 50 | 2.5 | 0.727 |
| 10 | 6 | 50 | 2.5 | 0.732 |
| 11 | 4 | 50 | 2 | 0.446 |
| 12 | 8 | 50 | 2 | 0.493 |
| 13 | 4 | 60 | 2.5 | 0.593 |
| 14 | 4 | 40 | 2.5 | 0.621 |
| 15 | 4 | 50 | 3 | 0.106 |
| 16 | 6 | 40 | 3 | 0.0461 |
| 17 | 6 | 60 | 3 | 0.424 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the regression parameters.
| Constant | Coefficient | Standard Deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.73 | 0.05 | 4.75 | 0.0260 |
| X1 | 0.012 | 0.04 | 0.080 | 0.7849 |
| X2 | 0.031 | 0.04 | 0.55 | 0.4828 |
| X3 | −0.13 | 0.04 | 9.87 | 0.0164 * |
| X1X2 | 0.014 | 0.06 | 0.056 | 0.0817 |
| X1 X3 | 0.084 | 0.06 | 2.06 | 0.1545 |
| X2 X3 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 4.81 | 0.0048 * |
| X12 | −0.12 | 0.06 | 4.13 | 0.8190 |
| X22 | −0.091 | 0.06 | 2.55 | 0.1945 |
| X32 | −0.23 | 0.06 | 16.51 | 0.0643 |
* Significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 2FTIR spectra. (a) YG; (b) SYG.
Effects on body weight (BW) and the immune organ indexes of mice radiated using 60Co (n = 6).
| Group | Dose (mg/kg/d) | Initial BW (g) | Final BW (g) | Spleen Index (%) | Thymus Index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 23.7 ± 1.0 | 30.5 ± 1.5 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.05 |
| Irradiated mice | 6 Gy | 24.5 ± 0.3 a | 28.2 ± 3.9 a | 0.16 ± 0.01 a | 0.08 ± 0.01 a |
| YG | 50 + 6 Gy | 25.0 ± 2.3 a | 30.0 ± 1.6 a | 0.18 ± 0.03 a | 0.11 ± 0.03 a |
| SYG | 50 + 6 Gy | 24.8 ± 0.0 a | 30.1 ± 3.3 a | 0.21 ± 0.02 a,c | 0.14 ± 0.03 a,c |
Results are means ± SD of six measurements. a p < 0.05, compared with the control; c p < 0.05, compared with the Irradiated mice.
Figure 3Microstructure analysis of mice spleen treated with YG (Yeast glucans) and SYG using Transmission Electron Microscopy. (a) Control; (b) Irradiated mice (c) Irradiated mice treated with YG; (d) Irradiated mice treated with SYG.
Effects of SYG on the splenocyte proliferation ability of mice radiated with 60Co (n = 6).
| Group | Dose (mg/kg/d) | ConA(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 12.0 ± 0.3 |
| Irradiated mice | 6 Gy | 9.7 ± 0.1 a |
| YG | 50 + 6 Gy | 10.3 ± 0.2 a,c |
| SYG | 50 + 6 Gy | 10.4 ± 0.1 a,c |
Results are means ± SD of six measurements. a p < 0.05, compared with the control; c p < 0.05, compared with the Irradiated mice.
Effects on activities of SOD, CAT and MDA in spleen of mice radiated with 60Co (n = 6).
| Group | Dose (mg/kg/d) | MDA (nmol/mL) | CAT (U/mL) | SOD (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 30 ± 2 | 123 ± 5 |
| Irradiated mice | 6 Gy | 1.9 ± 0.3 a | 17 ± 3 b | 84 ± 4 b,c |
| YG | 50 + 6 Gy | 2.1 ± 0.3 a | 20 ± 2 b | 115 ± 3 a |
| SYG | 50 + 6 Gy | 1.9 ± 0.5 a | 26 ± 1 a,c | 117 ± 6 a |
Results are means ± SD of six measurements. a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01; compared with the control; c p < 0.05, compared with the irradiated mice.