| Literature DB >> 28787867 |
Marina Ratova1, Peter J Kelly2, Glen T West3, Xiaohong Xia4, Yun Gao5.
Abstract
Bismuth molybdate thin films were deposited by reactive magnetron co-sputtering from two metallic targets in an argon/oxygen atmosphere, reportedly for the first time. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis showed that the ratio of bismuth to molybdenum in the coatings can be effectively controlled by varying the power applied to each target. Deposited coatings were annealed in air at 673 K for 30 min. The crystalline structure was assessed by means of Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Oxidation state information was obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Photodegradation of organic dyes methylene blue and rhodamine B was used for evaluation of the photocatalytic properties of the coatings under a visible light source. The photocatalytic properties of the deposited coatings were then compared to a sample of commercial titanium dioxide-based photocatalytic product. The repeatability of the dye degradation reactions and photocatalytic coating reusability are discussed. It was found that coatings with a Bi:Mo ratio of approximately 2:1 exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity of the coatings studied; its efficacy in dye photodegradation significantly outperformed a sample of commercial photocatalytic coating.Entities:
Keywords: bismuth molybdate; magnetron sputtering; photocatalytic coatings; thin films; visible light
Year: 2016 PMID: 28787867 PMCID: PMC5456504 DOI: 10.3390/ma9020067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic representation of Teer UDP450 sputtering rig.
Figure 2Molecular structures of methylene blue and rhodamine B.
Compositional properties and thickness of bismuth molybdate coatings.
| Sample ID | Power on Bi Target (W) | Power on Mo Target (W) | Content of Bi (at.%) | Content of Mo (at.%) | Coating Thickness (nm) | Coating Visual Appearance | Average Transmittance Value in the Visible Part of the Spectrum (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO1 | 100 | 500 | 46 | 54 | 180 | Light yellow, transparent | 79.7 |
| BMO2 | 125 | 500 | 52 | 47 | 185 | Light yellow, transparent | 80.2 |
| BMO3 | 150 | 450 | 64 | 36 | 200 | Light yellow to light brown, transparent | 74.2 |
| BMO4 | 200 | 400 | 69 | 31 | 310 | Light brown, transparent | 70.4 |
| BMO5 | 300 | 300 | 78 | 22 | 350 | Light brown, transparent | 70.1 |
Figure 3Results of Raman spectroscopy for bismuth molybdate coatings deposited onto glass substrates and annealed at 673 K.
Figure 4XRD patterns of bismuth molybdate coatings deposited onto glass substrates and annealed at 673 K.
Figure 5XPS results for coating BMO3: (a) Survey spectrum; (b) O 1s spectrum; (c) Mo 3d spectrum; (d) Bi 4f spectrum.
Figure 6Examples of band gap calculation for coatings BMO1 and BMO3.
Band gap and surface roughness values and dye degradation rate constants for bismuth molybdate coatings.
| Sample ID | Predominant Crystal Phase | Band Gap (eV) | Surface Roughness | Methylene Blue | Rhodamine B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO1 | Bismuth molybdate | 2.94 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| BMO2 | Bismuth molybdate | 2.94 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| BMO3 | Bismuth molybdate | 2.85 | 5.1 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| BMO4 | Bismuth molybdate/bismuth oxide | 2.74 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| BMO5 | Bismuth oxide | 2.65 | 5.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Figure 7Degradation kinetics of in contact with sample BMO3 and Activ® under visible light irradiation.
Figure 8Degradation kinetics of MB and RhB during 5 cycles of dye photodegradation using sample BMO3 under visible light irradiation.