| Literature DB >> 28787834 |
Mónika Sándor1, Cristina Lavinia Nistor2, Gábor Szalontai3, Rusandica Stoica4, Cristian Andi Nicolae5, Elvira Alexandrescu6, József Fazakas7, Florin Oancea8, Dan Donescu9.
Abstract
A series of aminopropyl-functionalized silica nanoparticles were prepared through a basic two step sol-gel process in water. Prior to being aminopropyl-functionalized, silica particles with an average diameter of 549 nm were prepared from tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), using a Stöber method. In a second step, aminopropyl-silica particles were prepared by silanization with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), added drop by drop to the sol-gel mixture. The synthesized amino-functionalized silica particles are intended to be used as supports for immobilization of humic acids (HA), through electrostatic bonds. Furthermore, by inserting beside APTES, unhydrolysable mono-, di- or trifunctional alkylsilanes (methyltriethoxy silane (MeTES), trimethylethoxysilane (Me₃ES), diethoxydimethylsilane (Me₂DES) and 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BETES)) onto silica particles surface, the spacing of the free amino groups was intended in order to facilitate their interaction with HA large molecules. Two sorts of HA were used for evaluating the immobilization capacity of the novel aminosilane supports. The results proved the efficient functionalization of silica nanoparticles with amino groups and showed that the immobilization of the two tested types of humic acid substances was well achieved for all the TEOS/APTES = 20/1 (molar ratio) silica hybrids having or not having the amino functions spaced by alkyl groups. It was shown that the density of aminopropyl functions is low enough at this low APTES fraction and do not require a further spacing by alkyl groups. Moreover, all the hybrids having negative zeta potential values exhibited low interaction with HA molecules.Entities:
Keywords: aminosilane supports; humic acids immobilization; silica hybrid particles; sol-gel process
Year: 2016 PMID: 28787834 PMCID: PMC5456519 DOI: 10.3390/ma9010034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Composition of the different silica systems and the corresponding carbon content and weight loss.
| Samples | Silica Systems | Molar Ratio | Carbon (%) | Weight Loss 25–250 °C (%) | Weight Loss 250–450 °C (%) | Weight Loss 450–700 °C (%) | Inorganic Residue at 700 °C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APTES | - | 27.63 | 23.1 | 7.5 | 22.1 | 47.3 | |
| TEOS | - | 0.94 | 9.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 85.8 | |
| TEOS/APTES | 20/1 | 5.98 | 11.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 80.5 | |
| TEOS/APTES/MeTES | 20/1/1 | 3.27 | 9.6 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 83.8 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me2DES | 20/1/1 | 4.74 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 84.1 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me3ES | 20/1/1 | 3.83 | 11.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 82.2 | |
| TEOS/APTES/BETES | 20/1/0.5 | 4.42 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 85.3 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me3ES | 10/1/1 | 5.01 | 13.6 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 76.7 | |
| TEOS/BETES | 10/0.5 | 2.96 | 10.6 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 83.1 |
Figure 1Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of aminopropyl-silica particles.
Particle size and zeta potential values for the studied supports.
| Samples | Silica Systems | Molar Ratio | Average Diameter (nm) | Zeta Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APTES | - | 580 | −19 | |
| TEOS | - | 549 | −45 | |
| TEOS/APTES | 20/1 | 691 | 15 | |
| TEOS/APTES/MeTES | 20/1/1 | 1471 | 52 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me2DES | 20/1/1 | 858 | 27 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me3ES | 20/1/1 | 653 | 13 | |
| TEOS/APTES/BETES | 20/1/0.5 | 716 | 53 | |
| TEOS/APTES/Me3ES | 10/1/1 | 558 | −5 | |
| TEOS/BETES | 10/0.5 | 590 | −48 |
Figure 2Size distribution by intensity of aminopropyl silica particles.
Figure 3Zeta potential distribution of aminopropyl silica particles.
Figure 4ESEM images of: (a) APTES film (Sample 1); (b) pristine TEOS silica particles (Sample 2); (c) APTES-grafted silica particles (Sample 3); and (d) MeTES and APTES—grafted silica particles (Sample 4).
Figure 5FTIR spectra of aminopropyl functionalized silica particles.
Figure 6(a) 29Si CP/MAS–NMR; and (b) 13C CP/MAS–NMR solid state spectra of pristine and modified silica particles.
Figure 7CO2 weight loss (TG-MS diagrams) recorded for representative aminosilica supports.
Figure 8Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for two selectedaminopropyl supports.
Figure 9Relative Concentration of immobilized humic acids (AHA and PHA, respectively) as a function of silica support type.
Figure 10(a) Pictures of the two humic acid stock solutions and immobilization tests of (b) AHA; and (c) PHA, respectively, on various silica supports.