| Literature DB >> 28786921 |
Tomomi Saito1,2, Satoru Takeda3, Yukiko Yamagishi4, Reiko Kubo5, Toshinori Kitamura6,7.
Abstract
Aims and objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether the training would influence the psychological mindedness of nurses and midwives. In addition, we explored the relationship of the change of psychological mindedness before and after the training and the correlation with their personality traits. Background: It is important for perinatal health professionals such as nurses and midwives to acquire intervention skills such as psychotherapy and counselling techniques. We think that one of the essential requisites is psychological mindedness. Method: A total of 45 perinatal health professionals who participated in the postpartum depression prevention programme were distributed a set of questionnaires including the Psychological Mindedness Scale (PMS) and Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) at the beginning and end of the training.Entities:
Keywords: Temperament and Character Inventory; harm-avoidance; personality trait; psychological mindedness; psychotherapy training; self-directedness
Year: 2017 PMID: 28786921 PMCID: PMC5618171 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare5030043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
The internal consistency of all the variables used in the present study and their means and SD at the beginning and the end of training session course.
| Variables | Cronbach | Mean (SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Training | Post-Training | Pre-Training | Post-Training | ||
| PMS | 0.84 | 0.93 | 83.1 (10.1) | 87.4 (14.1) | 6.4 *** |
| HA | 0.90 | 0.87 | 30.9 (8.4) | 29.0 (7.3) | 7.4 *** |
| NS | 0.76 | 0.65 | 26.9 (5.6) | 27.2 (4.5) | 1.4 |
| RD | 0.75 | 0.69 | 31.2 (3.4) | 31.1 (4.6) | 0.5 |
| P | 0.46 | 0.39 | 15.9 (2.6) | 16.7 (2.5) | 5.1 *** |
| SD | 0.85 | 0.79 | 43.9 (7.6) | 45.4 (7.2) | 5.4 *** |
| CO | 0.82 | 0.89 | 50.9 (6.9) | 51.3 (7.9) | 1.2 |
| ST | 0.85 | 0.89 | 20.1 (6.2) | 20.8 (7.0) | 2.3 * |
* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; HA, Harm Avoidance; NS, Novelty Seeking; RD, Reward Dependence; P, Persistence; SD, Self-Directedness; CO, Cooperativeness; ST, Self-Transcendence.
Figure 1Path model of PMS and TCI subscale. Paths are all standardised. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; TCI, Temperament and Character Inventory.
Correlations of all the variables used in the present study.
| Varibles | PMS | HA | NS | RD | P | SD | CO | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS | - | |||||||
| HA | −0.49 ** | - | ||||||
| NS | 0.08 | −0.384 * | - | |||||
| RD | 0.40 * | 0.051 | −0.015 | - | ||||
| P | 0.36 * | −0.312 * | −0.081 | 0.204 | - | |||
| SD | 0.39 * | −0.455 ** | −0.187 | 0.024 | 0.165 | - | ||
| CO | 0.73 ** | −0.394 ** | −0.179 | 0.524 ** | 0.525 ** | 0.532 ** | - | |
| ST | 0.26 | −0.468 ** | 0.057 | 0.237 | 0.558 ** | 0.131 | 0.436 ** | - |
| age | −0.204 ** | −0.179 ** | −0.199 ** | −0.080 | −0.013 | 0.359 *** | 0.078 | 0.053 |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; HA, Harm Avoidance, NS, Novelty Seeking, RD, Reward Dependence; P, Persistence; SD, Self-directedness; CO, Cooperativeness; ST, Self-transcendence. The upper and lower figures represent correlations at the beginning and the end of the training sessions, respectively.
Figure 2Path model of PMS and HA. Paths are all standardised. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; HA, Harm Avoidance.
Figure 3Path model of PMS and SD. Paths are all standardised. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; SD, Self-directedness.
Figure 4Path model of PMS, HA, and SD. Paths are all standardised. PMS, Psychological Mindedness Scale; SD, Self-directedness; HA, Harm Avoidance.