Literature DB >> 28786836

Using Economic Evaluation to Illustrate Value of Care for Improving Patient Safety and Quality: Choosing the Right Method.

William V Padula1, Ken K H Lee, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

To scale and sustain successful quality improvement (QI) interventions, it is recommended for health system leaders to calculate the economic and financial sustainability of the intervention. Many methods of economic evaluation exist, and the type of method depends on the audience: providers, researchers, and hospital executives. This is a primer to introduce cost-effectiveness analysis, budget impact analysis, and return on investment calculation as 3 distinct methods for each stakeholder needing a measurement of the value of QI at the health system level. Using cases for the QI of hospital-acquired condition rates (e.g., pressure injuries), this primer proceeds stepwise through each method beginning from the same starting point of constructing a model so that the repetition of steps is minimized and thereby capturing the attention of all intended audiences.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28786836     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  1 in total

1.  Expanding the Role of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Reauthorization and Facilitating Value Assessments.

Authors:  William V Padula; R Brett McQueen
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.