Literature DB >> 28785795

Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation.

Gui-Zhen Yang1, Fu-Shan Xue2, Hui-Xian Li1, Ya-Yang Liu1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28785795     DOI： 10.1007/s00431-017-2977-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN： 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance.

Authors:  Julian T Mulcaster; Joanna Mills; Orlando R Hung; Kirk MacQuarrie; J Adam Law; Saul Pytka; David Imrie; Chris Field
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature.

Authors:  P Niforopoulou; I Pantazopoulos; T Demestiha; E Koudouna; T Xanthos
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  The Utility of the C-MAC as a Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Jarrod M Mosier; Asad E Patanwala; Brittany Arcaris; John M Dicken
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.

Authors:  Marcin Madziala; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Steve Leung; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.183
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.