Literature DB >> 28785792

[Pain therapy in Germany - what is the difference between initial outpatient and inpatient treatment? : Assessment based on the KEDOQ pain dataset].

M Hüppe1, S Kükenshöner2, F Bosse3, H R Casser4, T Kohlmann5, G Lindena6, M Pfingsten7, F Petzke7, B Nagel4.   

Abstract

A comparison of chronic pain patients in outpatient and inpatient treatment settings regarding pain-related and psychological characteristics, has not yet been systematically analyzed. The core documentation and quality assurance in pain therapy (KEDOQ-Schmerz) is a quality assurance system for documentation and quality management of pain therapy in different treatment settings. The system was initiated by the German Pain Society. We used KEDOQ-Schmerz data to describe differences between patients being treated in outpatient and inpatient settings with respect to social, pain-related and psychological factors. In total, the set of KEDOQ-Schmerz data analyzed included information from 4705 patients (from 13 clinics) collected between January 2012 and April 2016. Patients received either outpatient (n = 2682) or inpatient (n = 2023) treatment. The data analyzed comprised sociodemographic, pain-related and psychological data collected through the German Pain Questionnaire (DSF) at the beginning of treatment as well as information about pain chronification and pain localization provided by practitioners. The statistical analysis was carried out by descriptive and comparative data analysis using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Patients with inpatient treatment were significantly older, more often female and more often had multiple pain localizations. They described stronger pain intensity and more frequently had a higher Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS) score of pain chronification. They described a significantly poorer physical and mental health-related quality of life in the short form (SF-12) health survey, had significantly higher depression, anxiety and stress values (DASS) and a poorer habitual well-being in the Marburg questionnaire on habitual well-being (MFHW). Significant group differences had only small effect sizes. Even though most predictors for the inpatient treatment setting in multivariate analysis were significant, in total they explained less than 5% of the variance. The results indicate that pain therapy in specialized pain settings more and more has to manage patients with higher pain chronification, higher pain-related stress and previous therapy experience. The differences in patient characteristics between treatment settings are mostly clinically unimportant. Differences in clinical features do not declare the allocation to one treatment setting or the other.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare research; KEDOQ-Schmerz; Pain therapy; Quality assurance; Treatment setting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28785792     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-017-0240-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  13 in total

1.  [Severity of chronic back pain. Assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System].

Authors:  D Michalski; A Hinz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  [Depression, anxiety and stress scales: DASS--A screening procedure not only for pain patients].

Authors:  P Nilges; C Essau
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Organized pain management in the DRG reimbursement system].

Authors:  G Lindena; H U Gerbershagen; M Zenz; H Laubenthal; A Schleppers
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)].

Authors:  P Rattay; H Butschalowsky; A Rommel; F Prütz; S Jordan; E Nowossadeck; O Domanska; P Kamtsiuris
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  [Staging of pain in patients with chronic low back pain in inpatient rehabilitation: validity of the Mainz Pain Staging System of pain chronification].

Authors:  P Hampel; M F Moergel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Grading the severity of chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael Von Korff; Johan Ormel; Francis J Keefe; Samuel F Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  [Chronic pain, pain disease, and satisfaction of patients with pain treatment in Germany. Results of a representative population survey].

Authors:  W Häuser; G Schmutzer; P Henningsen; E Brähler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  [Characterization of chronic pain patients in German pain centers : core data from more than 10,000 patients].

Authors:  J Frettlöh; C Maier; H Gockel; M Zenz; M Hüppe
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  [Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic pain].

Authors:  H U Gerbershagen; G Lindena; J Korb; S Kramer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Untying chronic pain: prevalence and societal burden of chronic pain stages in the general population - a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Frederik Wolfe; Peter Henningsen; Gabriele Schmutzer; Elmar Brähler; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pain chronification and the important role of non-disease-specific symptoms in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Petra Hoederath; Oliver Distler; Caroline Evers; Suzana Jordan; Britta Maurer; Mike Oliver Becker; Carina Mihai; Rucsandra Dobrota
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.156

2.  [Measurement of pain-related experiential avoidance: analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II-Pain in patients with chronic pain].

Authors:  Ronja Majeed; Ira Faust; Michael Hüppe; Christiane Hermann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Characteristic values and test statistical goodness of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) in patients with chronic pain : An evaluation based on the KEDOQ pain dataset].

Authors:  M Hüppe; K Schneider; H-R Casser; A Knille; T Kohlmann; G Lindena; B Nagel; J Nelles; M Pfingsten; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.107

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.