J Querengässer1,2, J Bulla3, K Hoffmann3, T Ross3. 1. ZfP Reichenau, AG Prozessoptimierung im MRV Baden-Württemberg, Feursteinstr. 55, 78479, Reichenau, Deutschland. jan.querengaesser@lwl.org. 2. LWL-Maßregelvollzugsklinik Herne, LWL-Akademie für Forensische Psychiatrie, Wilhelmstr. 120, 44649, Herne, Deutschland. jan.querengaesser@lwl.org. 3. ZfP Reichenau, AG Prozessoptimierung im MRV Baden-Württemberg, Feursteinstr. 55, 78479, Reichenau, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recidivism rates in substance-addicted patients placed in institutions according to §64 of the German legal code are approximately 50%, 3 years after discharge from inpatient treatment. The recidivism rates of patients with premature termination of inpatient treatment who had then been referred back to prison and were finally discharged into the community are unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is premature termination of treatment a risk factor for recidivism? METHODS: Patients released from forensic treatment according to § 64 of the German legal code were followed up for violent and non-violent recidivism. Full data were acquired for Baden-Württemberg patients released in 2010 and 2011 with regular vs. premature termination of treatment. RESULTS: All measures revealed highly significant group differences: 48% of the patients discharged after subsequent prison sentences recidivated within the first year and 73% within 3 years after discharge. Among recidivists, the severity of offences was much higher (odds ratio > 3.8 each). Regularly discharged patients also re-offended to a remarkable extent (50%). DISCUSSION: Patients serving prison sentences after unsuccessful forensic treatment are a high-risk group for recidivism. Alternative concepts of clinical and legal treatment of this group should be developed.
BACKGROUND: Recidivism rates in substance-addictedpatients placed in institutions according to §64 of the German legal code are approximately 50%, 3 years after discharge from inpatient treatment. The recidivism rates of patients with premature termination of inpatient treatment who had then been referred back to prison and were finally discharged into the community are unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is premature termination of treatment a risk factor for recidivism? METHODS:Patients released from forensic treatment according to § 64 of the German legal code were followed up for violent and non-violent recidivism. Full data were acquired for Baden-Württemberg patients released in 2010 and 2011 with regular vs. premature termination of treatment. RESULTS: All measures revealed highly significant group differences: 48% of the patients discharged after subsequent prison sentences recidivated within the first year and 73% within 3 years after discharge. Among recidivists, the severity of offences was much higher (odds ratio > 3.8 each). Regularly discharged patients also re-offended to a remarkable extent (50%). DISCUSSION: Patients serving prison sentences after unsuccessful forensic treatment are a high-risk group for recidivism. Alternative concepts of clinical and legal treatment of this group should be developed.