| Literature DB >> 28785081 |
Lin-Lin Zheng1,2,3, Qiong Zhao4,5, Zhan-Yuan Yu1,2, Shan-Yu Zhao1,2,3, De-Hui Zeng1,2.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine how specific leaf area (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28785081 PMCID: PMC5547060 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07170-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Soil properties as influenced by N addition and understory removal in a Mongolian pine plantation.
| Treatment | pH | Water content (%) | NO3 -N (mg kg−1) | NH4 +-N (mg kg−1) | MBC (mg kg−1) | Olsen-P (mg kg−1) | SOC (g kg−1) | Total N (g kg−1) | Total P (g kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.48 ± 0.18a | 7.58 ± 0.67a | 2.02 ± 0.38c | 1.05 ± 0.06c | 208.26 ± 20.89a | 2.16 ± 0.20a | 3.73 ± 0.49a | 0.35 ± 0.05ab | 0.1 ± 0.01a |
|
| 6.22 ± 0.05a | 7.07 ± 0.48a | 1.9 ± 0.32c | 1.24 ± 0.26c | 155.21 ± 9.86b | 1.88 ± 0.13b | 3.63 ± 0.43a | 0.29 ± 0.12b | 0.09 ± 0.01a |
|
| 5.51 ± 0.28b | 8.4 ± 1.05a | 7.59 ± 0.36b | 6.68 ± 0.41b | 162.83 ± 4.78b | 1.13 ± 0.02d | 4.89 ± 0.79a | 0.47 ± 0.10a | 0.11 ± 0.01a |
|
| 5.21 ± 0.2b | 7.38 ± 0.53a | 10.91 ± 1.3a | 13.54 ± 0.72a | 147.05 ± 9.17b | 1.55 ± 0.14c | 4.21 ± 0.41a | 0.4 ± 0.07ab | 0.09 ± 0.01a |
Values are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different letters within each column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), according to the LSD post-hoc test following one-way ANOVA.
Control control plots, U− understory removal, N + N addition, N + U− N addition with understory removal. MBC microbial biomass C, SOC soil organic C.
Figure 1Ordination diagram with variables and samples from principal component analysis (PCA) of soil variables in a Mongolian pine plantation. Each symbol represents a sample. Lines with arrow represent soil variables, and arrow points in the direction of steepest increase of values. The smaller angle between two variable arrows indicates stronger correlation, as the cosine of the angle between variable arrows equals their correlation coefficients. N+: N addition; U−: Understory removal.
Figure 2Changes in morphological and chemical traits of different-aged needles and their crown averages in response to N addition and understory removal in a Mongolian pine plantation. Values are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different letters within each age class indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), according to the LSD post-hoc test following ANOVA.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (P values in the parenthesis) between crown average values of needle traits and soil available nutrients.
| DW | SLA | LDMC | LNC | LPC | N:P ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| −0.399 (0.126) | 0.314 (0.236) |
|
|
|
|
| −0.455 (0.077) | 0.379 (0.148) |
|
|
|
|
DW individual needle dry weight, SLA specific leaf area, LDMC leaf dry matter content, LNC leaf N concentration, LPC leaf P concentration.
Figure 3Relationships between needle traits and soil properties (inorganic N and Olsen-P) in a Mongolian pine plantation. The data were fitted by linear regression, and fitted regression lines denote significant regressions (p < 0.05).