Literature DB >> 28784941

Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Plant Organellar DNA Enrichment Methods Suitable for Next-generation Sequencing.

Marisa E Miller1, Katie L Liberatore2, Shahryar F Kianian3.   

Abstract

Plant organellar genomes contain large, repetitive elements that may undergo pairing or recombination to form complex structures and/or sub-genomic fragments. Organellar genomes also exist in admixtures within a given cell or tissue type (heteroplasmy), and an abundance of subtypes may change throughout development or when under stress (sub-stoichiometric shifting). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are required to obtain deeper understanding of organellar genome structure and function. Traditional sequencing studies use several methods to obtain organellar DNA: (1) If a large amount of starting tissue is used, it is homogenized and subjected to differential centrifugation and/or gradient purification. (2) If a smaller amount of tissue is used (i.e., if seeds, material, or space is limited), the same process is performed as in (1), followed by whole-genome amplification to obtain sufficient DNA. (3) Bioinformatics analysis can be used to sequence the total genomic DNA and to parse out organellar reads. All these methods have inherent challenges and tradeoffs. In (1), it may be difficult to obtain such a large amount of starting tissue; in (2), whole-genome amplification could introduce a sequencing bias; and in (3), homology between nuclear and organellar genomes could interfere with assembly and analysis. In plants with large nuclear genomes, it is advantageous to enrich for organellar DNA to reduce sequencing costs and sequence complexity for bioinformatics analyses. Here, we compare a traditional differential centrifugation method with a fourth method, an adapted CpG-methyl pulldown approach, to separate the total genomic DNA into nuclear and organellar fractions. Both methods yield sufficient DNA for NGS, DNA that is highly enriched for organellar sequences, albeit at different ratios in mitochondria and chloroplasts. We present the optimization of these methods for wheat leaf tissue and discuss major advantages and disadvantages of each approach in the context of sample input, protocol ease, and downstream application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784941      PMCID: PMC5613775          DOI: 10.3791/55528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  31 in total

1.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  An efficient procedure for plant organellar genome assembly, based on whole genome data from the 454 GS FLX sequencing platform.

Authors:  Tongwu Zhang; Xiaowei Zhang; Songnian Hu; Jun Yu
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.993

3.  Isolation and subfractionation of plant mitochondria for proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Holger Eubel; Joshua L Heazlewood; A Harvey Millar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2007

4.  De novo assembly of the carrot mitochondrial genome using next generation sequencing of whole genomic DNA provides first evidence of DNA transfer into an angiosperm plastid genome.

Authors:  Massimo Iorizzo; Douglas Senalik; Marek Szklarczyk; Dariusz Grzebelus; David Spooner; Philipp Simon
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Structural dynamics of cereal mitochondrial genomes as revealed by complete nucleotide sequencing of the wheat mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Yasunari Ogihara; Yukiko Yamazaki; Koji Murai; Akira Kanno; Toru Terachi; Takashi Shiina; Naohiko Miyashita; Shuhei Nasuda; Chiharu Nakamura; Naoki Mori; Shigeo Takumi; Minoru Murata; Satoshi Futo; Koichiro Tsunewaki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert Pinard; Alex de Winter; Gary J Sarkis; Mark B Gerstein; Karrie R Tartaro; Ramona N Plant; Michael Egholm; Jonathan M Rothberg; John H Leamon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Relationships of wild and domesticated rices (Oryza AA genome species) based upon whole chloroplast genome sequences.

Authors:  Peterson W Wambugu; Marta Brozynska; Agnelo Furtado; Daniel L Waters; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Resolving the Complexity of Human Skin Metagenomes Using Single-Molecule Sequencing.

Authors:  Yu-Chih Tsai; Sean Conlan; Clayton Deming; Julia A Segre; Heidi H Kong; Jonas Korlach; Julia Oh
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Accelerated evolution of the mitochondrial genome in an alloplasmic line of durum wheat.

Authors:  Andrzej K Noyszewski; Farhad Ghavami; Loai M Alnemer; Ali Soltani; Yong Q Gu; Naxin Huo; Steven Meinhardt; Penny M A Kianian; Shahryar F Kianian
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.