Literature DB >> 28784474

Trained and consumer panel evaluation of sparkling wines sweetened to brut or demi sec residual sugar levels with three different sugars.

Kenneth M McMahon1, Charles Diako1, Jesse Aplin1, D Scott Mattinson2, Caleb Culver3, Carolyn F Ross4.   

Abstract

The dosage liquid, added at the final stage of sparkling wine production, imparts residual sweetness to the wine. No study has yet analyzed the influence of dosage composition on the final wine's sensory profile or consumer acceptance. In this study, dosage composition was altered through the addition of different sugar types (ST; fructose, glucose, or sucrose) to produce seven sparkling wines of varying residual sugar levels (RSL), including no sugar added, brut (5.3-8.4gST/L) or demi sec (34.9-37.8gST/L). As evaluated by a trained panel (n=9), the interaction between ST and RSL influenced the perception of caramelized/vanilla/honey (CVH) flavor, sweet taste, and sour taste attributes (p<0.05). Demi sec wines displayed lower intensities of green flavor, yeasty flavor, and sour taste compared to the no sugar added wine (p<0.05). Consumers (n=126) also evaluated the sparkling wines and ST, RSL, and their interaction influenced consumer acceptance of different attributes, as well as the perception of the "refreshing" aspect of the wine (p<0.05). Overall consumer acceptance of sparkling wines was highly correlated (r2≤0.88) to CVH, floral, and fruity flavors, as well as sweet taste and creamy mouthfeel. External preference mapping revealed two clusters of consumers. Both consumer clusters liked wines sweetened with fructose, but Cluster 1 liked the demi sec sparkling wine sweetened with fructose (32.8g/L fructose) while Cluster 2 preferred the brut wine sweetened with fructose (8.4g/L fructose). These results suggest that consumer preference for sparkling wine was segmented based on sweetness preference. The results of this study offer winemakers knowledge about the influence of dosage composition on the sensory profile of sparkling wine.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer liking; Dosage; Sparkling wine; Sugar; Sweetness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784474     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Res Int        ISSN: 0963-9969            Impact factor:   6.475


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Maillard reaction in traditional method sparkling wine.

Authors:  Hannah M Charnock; Gary J Pickering; Belinda S Kemp
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Development of a Descriptive Profile and References for the Assessment of Taste and Mouthfeel Descriptors of Protected Designation of Origin Wines.

Authors:  Anna Gomis-Bellmunt; Anna Claret; Anna Puig-Pujol; Francisco José Pérez-Elortondo; Luís Guerrero
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-22

3.  Innovative Alcoholic Drinks Obtained by Co-Fermenting Grape Must and Fruit Juice.

Authors:  Daniela Fracassetti; Paolo Bottelli; Onofrio Corona; Roberto Foschino; Ileana Vigentini
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 4.  Bubbles, Foam Formation, Stability and Consumer Perception of Carbonated Drinks: A Review of Current, New and Emerging Technologies for Rapid Assessment and Control.

Authors:  Claudia Gonzalez Viejo; Damir D Torrico; Frank R Dunshea; Sigfredo Fuentes
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-11-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.