Literature DB >> 28783881

Point estimation in adaptive enrichment designs.

Kevin Kunzmann1, Laura Benner1, Meinhard Kieser1.   

Abstract

Adaptive enrichment designs are an attractive option for clinical trials that aim at demonstrating efficacy of therapies, which may show different benefit for the full patient population and a prespecified subgroup. In these designs, based on interim data, either the subgroup or the full population is selected for further exploration. When selection is based on efficacy data, this introduces bias to the commonly used maximum likelihood estimator. For the situation of two-stage designs with a single prespecified subgroup, we present six alternative estimators and investigate their performance in a simulation study. The most consistent reduction of bias over the range of scenarios considered was achieved by a method combining the uniformly minimum variance conditionally unbiased estimator with a conditional moment estimator. Application of the methods is illustrated by a clinical trial example.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias reduction; enrichment designs; point estimation; subgroup selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28783881     DOI: 10.1002/sim.7412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-17

2.  Point and interval estimation in two-stage adaptive designs with time to event data and biomarker-driven subpopulation selection.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Lindsay A Renfro; Ekkehard Glimm; Josephine N Khan; John A Kairalla; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Point estimation following two-stage adaptive threshold enrichment clinical trials.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Lindsay A Renfro; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Neoadjuvant irradiation of extremity soft tissue sarcoma with ions (Extrem-ion): study protocol for a randomized phase II pilot trial.

Authors:  D Brügemann; B Lehner; M Kieser; J Krisam; A Hommertgen; C Jaekel; S B Harrabi; K Herfarth; G Mechtesheimer; O Sedlaczek; G Egerer; A Geisbüsch; M Uhl; J Debus; K Seidensaal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.