Literature DB >> 28783570

Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.

Tobias Neher1, Kirsten C Wagener2, Matthias Latzel3.   

Abstract

Hearing aid (HA) users can differ markedly in their benefit from directional processing (or beamforming) algorithms. The current study therefore investigated candidacy for different bilateral directional processing schemes. Groups of elderly listeners with symmetric (N = 20) or asymmetric (N = 19) hearing thresholds for frequencies below 2 kHz, a large spread in the binaural intelligibility level difference (BILD), and no difference in age, overall degree of hearing loss, or performance on a measure of selective attention took part. Aided speech reception was measured using virtual acoustics together with a simulation of a linked pair of completely occluding behind-the-ear HAs. Five processing schemes and three acoustic scenarios were used. The processing schemes differed in the tradeoff between signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement and binaural cue preservation. The acoustic scenarios consisted of a frontal target talker presented against two speech maskers from ±60° azimuth or spatially diffuse cafeteria noise. For both groups, a significant interaction between BILD, processing scheme, and acoustic scenario was found. This interaction implied that, in situations with lateral speech maskers, HA users with BILDs larger than about 2 dB profited more from preserved low-frequency binaural cues than from greater SNR improvement, whereas for smaller BILDs the opposite was true. Audiometric asymmetry reduced the influence of binaural hearing. In spatially diffuse noise, the maximal SNR improvement was generally beneficial. N0Sπ detection performance at 500 Hz predicted the benefit from low-frequency binaural cues. Together, these findings provide a basis for adapting bilateral directional processing to individual and situational influences. Further research is needed to investigate their generalizability to more realistic HA conditions (e.g., with low-frequency vent-transmitted sound).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binaural hearing; Directional processing; Hearing aids; Hearing impairment; Individual differences; Speech reception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28783570     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jantien L Vroegop; Nienke C Homans; André Goedegebure; J Gertjan Dingemanse; Teun van Immerzeel; Marc P van der Schroeff
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Evaluation of a Method for Determining Binaural Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure (TFS-AF Test) for Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Low-Frequency Hearing.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Benefits of Beamforming With Local Spatial-Cue Preservation for Speech Localization and Segregation.

Authors:  Le Wang; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Robust Data-Driven Auditory Profiling Towards Precision Audiology.

Authors:  Raul Sanchez-Lopez; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 6.  Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Effects of Binaural Spatialization in Wireless Microphone Systems for Hearing Aids on Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gilles Courtois; Hervé Lissek; Philippe Estoppey; Yves Oesch; Xavier Gigandet
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Senescent Changes in Sensitivity to Binaural Temporal Fine Structure.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Aleksander P Sęk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements.

Authors:  Micha Lundbeck; Laura Hartog; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Lars Bramsløw; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Lukas Geiling; Christopher Hauth; Thomas Hocke; Stefan Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.