Literature DB >> 28783021

Acoustic environments matter: Synergistic benefits to humans and ecological communities.

Clinton D Francis1, Peter Newman2, B Derrick Taff2, Crow White3, Christopher A Monz4, Mitchell Levenhagen5, Alissa R Petrelli3, Lauren C Abbott2, Jennifer Newton6, Shan Burson7, Caren B Cooper8, Kurt M Fristrup9, Christopher J W McClure10, Daniel Mennitt11, Michael Giamellaro12, Jesse R Barber13.   

Abstract

Protected areas are critical locations worldwide for biodiversity preservation and offer important opportunities for increasingly urbanized humans to experience nature. However, biodiversity preservation and visitor access are often at odds and creative solutions are needed to safeguard protected area natural resources in the face of high visitor use. Managing human impacts to natural soundscapes could serve as a powerful tool for resolving these conflicting objectives. Here, we review emerging research that demonstrates that the acoustic environment is critical to wildlife and that sounds shape the quality of nature-based experiences for humans. Human-made noise is known to affect animal behavior, distributions and reproductive success, and the organization of ecological communities. Additionally, new research suggests that interactions with nature, including natural sounds, confer benefits to human welfare termed psychological ecosystem services. In areas influenced by noise, elevated human-made noise not only limits the variety and abundance of organisms accessible to outdoor recreationists, but also impairs their capacity to perceive the wildlife that remains. Thus soundscape changes can degrade, and potentially limit the benefits derived from experiences with nature via indirect and direct mechanisms. We discuss the effects of noise on wildlife and visitors through the concept of listening area and demonstrate how the perceptual worlds of both birds and humans are reduced by noise. Finally, we discuss how management of soundscapes in protected areas may be an innovative solution to safeguarding both and recommend several key questions and research directions to stimulate new research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic noise; Coupled dynamic; Listening area; Park paradox; Protected areas; Psychological ecosystem services; Soundscape; Wildlife

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28783021     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community.

Authors:  Nathan J Kleist; Robert P Guralnick; Alexander Cruz; Christopher A Lowry; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The phantom chorus: birdsong boosts human well-being in protected areas.

Authors:  Danielle M Ferraro; Zachary D Miller; Lauren A Ferguson; B Derrick Taff; Jesse R Barber; Peter Newman; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks.

Authors:  Rachel T Buxton; Amber L Pearson; Claudia Allou; Kurt Fristrup; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Soundscape dynamics of a cold protected forest: dominance of aircraft noise.

Authors:  Elie Grinfeder; Sylvain Haupert; Manon Ducrettet; Julien Barlet; Marie-Pierre Reynet; Frédéric Sèbe; Jérôme Sueur
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  A stochastic simulation model for assessing the masking effects of road noise for wildlife, outdoor recreation, and bioacoustic monitoring.

Authors:  Cory A Toth; Benjamin P Pauli; Christopher J W McClure; Clinton D Francis; Peter Newman; Jesse R Barber; Kurt Fristrup
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Environmental conditions lead to shifts in individual communication, which can cause cascading effects on soundscape composition.

Authors:  Meelyn M Pandit; Eli S Bridge; Jeremy D Ross
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Bird population declines and species turnover are changing the acoustic properties of spring soundscapes.

Authors:  C A Morrison; A Auniņš; Z Benkő; L Brotons; T Chodkiewicz; P Chylarecki; V Escandell; D P Eskildsen; A Gamero; S Herrando; F Jiguet; J A Kålås; J Kamp; A Klvaňová; P Kmecl; A Lehikoinen; Å Lindström; C Moshøj; D G Noble; I J Øien; J-Y Paquet; J Reif; T Sattler; B S Seaman; N Teufelbauer; S Trautmann; C A M van Turnhout; P Vořišek; S J Butler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.