| Literature DB >> 28782908 |
Sanming Li1,2,3, Jing Zhou1,2,3, Liying Zhang1,2,3, Juan Li1,2,3, Jingwen Yu1,2,3, Ke Ning1,2,3, Yangluowa Qu1,2,3, Hui He1,2,3, Yongxiong Chen1,2,3, Peter S Reinach4, Chia-Yang Liu5, Zuguo Liu1,2,3,6, Wei Li1,2,3,6.
Abstract
Ectodysplasin A (Eda), a member of the tumour necrosis factor superfamily, plays an important role in ectodermal organ development. An EDA mutation underlies the most common of ectodermal dysplasias, that is X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) in humans. Even though it lacks a developmental function, the role of Eda during the postnatal stage remains elusive. In this study, we found tight junctional proteins ZO-1 and claudin-1 expression is largely reduced in epidermal, corneal and lung epithelia in Eda mutant Tabby mice at different postnatal ages. These declines are associated with tail ulceration, corneal pannus formation and lung infection. Furthermore, topical application of recombinant Eda protein markedly mitigated corneal barrier dysfunction. Using cultures of a human corneal epithelial cell line and Tabby mouse skin tissue explants, Eda up-regulated expression of ZO-1 and claudin-1 through activation of the sonic hedgehog signalling pathway. We conclude that EDA gene expression contributes to the maintenance of epithelial barrier function. Such insight may help efforts to identify novel strategies for improving management of XLHED disease manifestations in a clinical setting.Entities:
Keywords: Ectodysplasin A; X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; epithelial barrier dysfunction; tight junction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28782908 PMCID: PMC5742694 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Expression of tight junction proteins, ZO‐1 and claudin‐1, in the corneal and skin epithelia of Tabby mice (Ta) and wild‐type mice (WT). (A) Western blot results show that ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 decreased in the corneal epithelia of four‐ and eight‐week‐old Tabby mice when compared with wild‐type control. (B) ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 expression was lower in the skin tissue of one‐, four‐ and eight‐week‐old Tabby mice. (C) ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 was strongly expressed in the surface layer corneal epithelium of eight‐week‐old wild‐type mice, while they were weakly expressed in Tabby mice. (D) ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 was expressed in the superficial layers of the skin epithelium of eight‐week‐old wild‐type mice, while they were weakly and discontinuously expressed in Tabby mice. Scale bars: 30 μm.
Figure 2The Corneal and skin epithelial inflammation augmentation in Tabby mice. (A) Immunofluorescent staining of CD45 was negative in the wild‐type mice, while there were sporadic positive cells in the superficial corneal stroma at 4 weeks, which spread into the epithelial layer in eight‐week‐old Tabby mice. (B) CD45‐positive cells were dramatically increased in the dermis of Tabby mice at 4 and 8 weeks of age. The mRNA levels of β (C) and Dmkn (D) significantly increased in four‐ and eight‐week‐old Tabby mice corneal epithelia when compared to the wild‐type littermates(n = 6 mice for each group). In skin epithelia, β (E) and Dmkn (F) expression was also up‐regulated in four‐ and eight‐week‐old Tabby mice (n = 5 mice for each group). Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance was analysed using an unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). Scale bars: 60 μm.
Figure 3Corneal bacterial infection, corneal pannus and tail ulcer in Tabby mice. (A) Bacterial culture of the corneal tissue suspension from eight‐week‐old Tabby mice and wild‐type littermates. (B) The number of bacterial colonies was significantly larger in Tabby mice compared with that in wild‐type mice (n = 5 mice for each group). Lysozyme 1 (Lyz 1) (C) and Lysozyme 2 (Lyz 2) (D) mRNA expression was both up‐regulated in the corneal epithelia of four‐ and eight‐week‐old Tabby mice (n = 6 mice for each group). (E) Corneal pannus presented in the central cornea of 16‐week‐old Tabby mouse, while it was not found in wild‐type mice. (F) The hair of tail skin was absent in the 16‐week‐old Tabby mouse, and there were small ulcers present in the tail skin surface. No tail ulcer was found in wild‐type mice. (G) The morbidity of the corneal pannus was 15.9% in those housed in the SPF environment, while it was 63.2% in Tabby mice housed in the CF environment. (H) The morbidity of tail ulcer in Tabby mice was 2.4% in SPF, while it was 13.5% in CF. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance was analysed using an unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 4Topical Eda application partially rescues corneal epithelial barrier dysfunction in Tabby mice. (A) Wild‐type mice lack fluorescein dye staining in the cornea. Tabby mice cornea strongly stain in the PBS treatment group, whereas it is markedly less prominent in the Eda treatment group. (B) Fluorescein score dramatically decreased after Eda treatment. (C) Carboxy fluorescein (CF) permeation was very evident across the corneal epithelium of Tabby mice, while it was reduced after Eda treatment. (D) Fluorescence intensity significantly decreased in Tabby mice after Eda treatment. (E) Corneal epithelial ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 expression was up‐regulated after application of Eda protein in Tabby mice. (F) Whole mount staining of ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 showed both proteins were up‐regulated in the corneal epithelia of Tabby mice after Eda treatment. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance was analysed using an unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001), n = 4 for each group. Scale bars: 30 μm.
Figure 5Eda activates sonic hedgehog signalling pathway in Tabby mice skin. One‐week‐old wild‐type and Tabby mice skin explants were cultured in the absence or presence of Eda (0.1 μg/ml), Shh (0.5 μg/ml), and Shh inhibitor (SHHI) cyclopamine (20 μM). Total mRNA and protein were, respectively, harvested after 24‐ and 48‐hrs culture. (A) The Shh mRNA expression in Tabby mice skin was much lower than that in the wild‐type mice. Addition of Eda increased the expression of Shh. (B) Gli‐1 mRNA expression in Tabby mice skin was also much lower compared with wild‐type mice. Addition of Eda or Shh up‐regulated Gli‐1 expression. (C) Western blot showed Shh inhibitor cyclopamine reduced expression of ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 in wild‐type skin tissue. Application of Eda or Shh protein in Tabby mice skin tissue culture up‐regulated ZO‐1, claudin‐1, and Gli‐1 expression. Addition of cyclopamine attenuated the effect of Eda. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance was analyzed using an unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001), n = 3 for each group.
Figure 6Eda regulates epithelial barrier function through the sonic hedgehog signalling pathway. (A) The pcDNA3.1‐EDA plasmid was transfected into human corneal epithelial (HCE) cell line for 1 week. The expression of ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 increased in EDA transfected HCE cells. (B) qRT‐PCR results showed and mRNA was significantly up‐regulated in EDA transfected cells. (C) gene expression in HCE cells was significantly up‐regulated by Eda protein and could not be blocked by cyclopamine. (D) gene expression in HCE cells was also up‐regulated by Eda protein and could be blocked by cyclopamine. (E) Western blot results show that Eda protein up‐regulated the expression of ZO‐1, claudin‐1 and Gli‐1 in HCE cells in a dose‐dependent manner, and this effect could be blocked by cyclopamine. (F) Immunofluorescent staining showed ZO‐1 and claudin‐1 expression in HCE cells was remarkably inhibited by cyclopamine. Nuclear expression of Gli‐1 was enhanced in HCE cells after Eda treatment and was down‐regulated with additional cyclopamine. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance was analysed using an unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001), n = 3 for each group. Scale bar: 60 μm.