L D Hodges1, T Nielsen1, D Baken2. 1. School of Sport and Exercise, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 2. School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME), multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HC) following a 24-h repeated exercise test. METHODS: Ten CFS, seven MS and 17 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (10, CFS HC; and seven, MS HC) were recruited. Each participant completed a maximal incremental cycle exercise test on day 1 and again 24 h later. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), oxygen consumption (V˙O2), carbon dioxide production and workload (WL) were recorded. Data analysis investigated these responses at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak work rate (PWR). RESULTS: On day 2, both CFS and MS had significantly reduced max workload compared to HC. On day 2, significant differences were apparent in WL between CFS and CFS HC (93 ± 37 W, 132 ± 42 W, P<0·042). CFS workload decreased on day 2, alongside a decrease in HR but with an increase in V˙O2 (ml kg min-1 ). This was in comparison with an increase in WL, HR and V˙O2 for CFS HC. MS demonstrated a decreased WL compared to MS HC on both days of the study (D1 81 ± 30 W, 116 ±30 W; D2 84 ± 29 W, 118 ± 36 W); however, patients with MS were able to achieve a higher WL on day 2 alongside MS HC. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that exercise exhibits a different physiological response in MS and CFS/ME, demonstrating repeated cardiovascular exercise testing as a valid measure for differentiating between fatigue conditions.
PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME), multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HC) following a 24-h repeated exercise test. METHODS: Ten CFS, seven MS and 17 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (10, CFS HC; and seven, MS HC) were recruited. Each participant completed a maximal incremental cycle exercise test on day 1 and again 24 h later. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), oxygen consumption (V˙O2), carbon dioxide production and workload (WL) were recorded. Data analysis investigated these responses at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak work rate (PWR). RESULTS: On day 2, both CFS and MS had significantly reduced max workload compared to HC. On day 2, significant differences were apparent in WL between CFS and CFS HC (93 ± 37 W, 132 ± 42 W, P<0·042). CFS workload decreased on day 2, alongside a decrease in HR but with an increase in V˙O2 (ml kg min-1 ). This was in comparison with an increase in WL, HR and V˙O2 for CFS HC. MS demonstrated a decreased WL compared to MS HC on both days of the study (D1 81 ± 30 W, 116 ±30 W; D2 84 ± 29 W, 118 ± 36 W); however, patients with MS were able to achieve a higher WL on day 2 alongside MS HC. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that exercise exhibits a different physiological response in MS and CFS/ME, demonstrating repeated cardiovascular exercise testing as a valid measure for differentiating between fatigue conditions.
Authors: Maximillian J Nelson; Jonathan D Buckley; Rebecca L Thomson; Daniel Clark; Richard Kwiatek; Kade Davison Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Katarina Lien; Bjørn Johansen; Marit B Veierød; Annicke S Haslestad; Siv K Bøhn; Morten N Melsom; Kristin R Kardel; Per O Iversen Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2019-06
Authors: Jacob B Lindheimer; Thomas Alexander; Wei Qian; Jacquelyn C Klein-Adams; Gudrun Lange; Benjamin H Natelson; Dane B Cook; Helene Z Hill; Michael J Falvo Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2020-09
Authors: Dane B Cook; Stephanie VanRiper; Ryan J Dougherty; Jacob B Lindheimer; Michael J Falvo; Yang Chen; Jin-Mann S Lin; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Donna M Mancini; Danielle L Brunjes; Anuradha Lala; Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Johanna P Contreras; Benjamin H Natelson Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Maximillian J Nelson; Jasvir S Bahl; Jonathan D Buckley; Rebecca L Thomson; Kade Davison Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.817