Literature DB >> 28782092

Hard tissue debris removal from the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars with ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation: a micro-computed tomography study.

J Verstraeten1, W Jacquet2, R J G De Moor3, M A Meire1.   

Abstract

This study is to investigate the efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques on removal of accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) in mesial roots of human mandibular molars. Extracted human mandibular molars with an isthmus between the mesial root canals were selected based on micro-CT (μCT) scans. The mesial canals were instrumented to an apical diameter ISO30 using ProTaper rotary files. Teeth were randomly assigned to three irrigant activation groups (n = 10): ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) using a size 20 Irrisafe for 3 × 20 s, laser-activated irrigation (LAI) with an Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) and plain 300 μm fiber tip inside the canal (20 mJ, 20 Hz, 3 × 20 s), and laser-activated irrigation with identical parameters with a 400 μm photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) tip held at the canal entrance. All teeth were scanned with μCT before and after instrumentation and after irrigant activation. After reconstruction and image processing, the canal system volume filled with hard tissue debris before and after irrigant activation was calculated. Changes in hard tissue debris volumes were compared between groups using one-way ANOVA. The percentage volume of hard tissue debris (vol%) was significantly lower after irrigant activation in all groups. Although the lowest debris values were observed in the laser groups, no significant differences in the vol% of accumulated hard tissue debris after activation were observed between groups. Accumulated hard tissue debris was reduced significantly in all activation groups. Ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation regimens performed similarly in this respect. None of the tested methods was able to render the root canal systems free of debris.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dentine debris; Er:YAG laser; Laser-activated irrigation; Photon-induced photoacoustic streaming; Root canal cleaning; Ultrasonically activated irrigation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28782092     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2297-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  39 in total

1.  A radiographic recall evaluation of 894 endodontic cases treated in a dental school setting.

Authors:  Fred W Benenati; Sharukh S Khajotia
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Bacteriological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation.

Authors:  Pablo Spoleti; Martha Siragusa; María Julia Spoleti
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser.

Authors:  Harry Huiz Peeters; Ketut Suardita
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.

Authors:  Rubin Gutarts; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  The influence of the ultrasonic intensity on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation.

Authors:  Lei-Meng Jiang; Bram Verhaagen; Michel Versluis; Jelmer Langedijk; Paul Wesselink; Lucas W M van der Sluis
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer.

Authors:  Rebecca Guidotti; Elisabetta Merigo; Carlo Fornaini; Jean-Paul Rocca; Etienne Medioni; Paolo Vescovi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Impact of needle insertion depth on the removal of hard-tissue debris.

Authors:  R Perez; A A Neves; F G Belladonna; E J N L Silva; E M Souza; S Fidel; M A Versiani; I Lima; C Carvalho; G De-Deus
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Assessing accumulated hard-tissue debris using micro-computed tomography and free software for image processing and analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo De-Deus; Juliana Marins; Aline de Almeida Neves; Claudia Reis; Sandra Fidel; Marco A Versiani; Haimon Alves; Ricardo Tadeu Lopes; Sidnei Paciornik
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars.

Authors:  Aaron Burleson; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal.

Authors:  Roy George; Ian A Meyers; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.171

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation.

Authors:  Jelena Vidas; Damir Snjaric; Alen Braut; Zoran Carija; Romana Persic Bukmir; Roeland J G De Moor; Ivana Brekalo Prso
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  G Plotino; M Colangeli; T Özyürek; G DeDeus; C Panzetta; R Castagnola; N M Grande; L Marigo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Three-dimensional morphologic classifications and analysis of canal isthmuses in permanent molars.

Authors:  Xingzhe Yin; Jeffrey W W Chang; Qianqian Wang; Chengfei Zhang; Xiaoyan Wang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Amplification of pressure waves in laser-assisted endodontics with synchronized delivery of Er:YAG laser pulses.

Authors:  Nejc Lukač; Matija Jezeršek
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Activated Irrigation vs. Conventional non-activated Irrigation in Endodontics - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anand Susila; Joseph Minu
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Effect of tip insertion depth and irradiation parameters on the efficacy of cleaning calcium hydroxide from simulated lateral canals using Er:YAG laser- or ultrasonic-activated irrigation.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Hoshihara; Satoshi Watanabe; Akira Kouno; Kanako Yao; Takashi Okiji
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 7.  Effect of Chemical Debridement and Irrigant Activation on Endodontic Treatment Outcomes: An Updated Overview.

Authors:  Nesreen Tashkandi; Faisal Alghamdi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-23

8.  Effectiveness of Different Final Irrigation Procedures on Enterococcus faecalis Infected Root Canals: An In Vitro Evaluation.

Authors:  Sanda Ileana Cîmpean; Ioana-Sofia Pop-Ciutrila; Sebastian-Roberto Matei; Ioana Alina Colosi; Carmen Costache; Gheorghe Zsolt Nicula; Iulia Clara Badea; Loredana Colceriu Burtea
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.748

9.  Effectiveness of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in root canal models with different diameters or tapers.

Authors:  Cheng Wen; Yuanyuan Kong; Jian Zhao; Yang Li; Ya Shen; Xuechao Yang; Qianzhou Jiang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.

Authors:  Christos Boutsioukis; Maria Teresa Arias-Moliz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.165

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.