Literature DB >> 28781797

Effect of modern, high-quality prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy on outcome: Evidence from a community radiation oncology program.

Johnny Kao1, Amanda Zucker1, Jonathan Timmins1, Shankar Taramangalam1, Jeffrey Pettit1, Aaron J Woodall2, Edward Loizides2, Andrew T Wong1.   

Abstract

Radiation technique for prostate cancer has continuously evolved over the past several decades. The aim of the present study was to describe the effects of implementing modern prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (M-IMRT) on dosimetry and outcome. Between January 2010 and April 2012, 48 consecutive patients were treated with conventional prostate IMRT (C-IMRT) to a dose of 81 Gy. Between May 2012 and April 2015, 50 consecutive patients were treated with M-IMRT to the entire prostate to a dose of 75.6-79.2 Gy, while using prostate magnetic resonance imaging fusion, dose-volume constraints prioritizing normal tissue avoidance above planning target volume coverage, and boosting any dominant intraprostatic masses to 79.2-81 Gy. Rectal Dmax, V75, V60, V65 and V50, bladder Dmax, V75, V70 and V65, and acute and late toxicities were compared between the C-IMRT and M-IMRT groups. The median follow-up for the C-IMRT and M-IMRT groups was 61 vs. 26 months, respectively (P<0.001). M-IMRT resulted in a significant reduction in median rectal Dmax, rectal V75, rectal V70, rectal V65, bladder Dmax, bladder V75, bladder V70 and bladder V65 (P<0.01 for all). There was no significant difference in rectal V50. The 2-year rate of late grade ≥2 rectal bleeding was 13% with C-IMRT vs. 3% with M-IMRT (P=0.03). The 2-year rate of late grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity was 11% for C-IMRT vs. 5% for M-IMRT (P=0.21). There were no significant differences in acute toxicity, biochemical control or overall survival. Therefore, compared with C-IMRT, M-IMRT was associated with reduced rectal toxicity without compromising disease control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dosimetry; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; prostate cancer; radiation oncology; toxicity

Year:  2017        PMID: 28781797      PMCID: PMC5532702          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  23 in total

1.  The systematic application of quality measures and process control in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Todd Pawlicki; Bhisham Chera; Trent Ning; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick C Walsh; Theodore L DeWeese; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Xinglei Shen; Adam P Dicker; Laura A Doyle; Amy S Harrison; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Progress and controversies: Radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neil E Martin; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Boosting imaging defined dominant prostatic tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Glenn Bauman; Masoom Haider; Uulke A Van der Heide; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; M Hunt; H J Lee; D Lombardi; C C Ling; V E Reuter; E S Venkatraman; S A Leibel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Association Between Treatment at a High-Volume Facility and Improved Survival for Radiation-Treated Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Chen; Brandon A Mahal; Vinayak Muralidhar; Michelle Nezolosky; Clair J Beard; Robert B Den; Felix Y Feng; Karen E Hoffman; Neil E Martin; Peter F Orio; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Long-term toxicity following 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer from the RTOG 9406 phase I/II dose escalation study.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Kyounghwa Bae; Mack Roach; Arnold M Markoe; Howard M Sandler; Janice Ryu; Matthew B Parliament; William Straube; Richard K Valicenti; James D Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image guided radiotherapy compared with non-IGRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Marisa Kollmeier; Brett Cox; Anthony Fidaleo; Dahlia Sperling; Xin Pei; Brett Carver; Jonathan Coleman; Michael Lovelock; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multiparametric prostate MRI-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy guided by prostatic calcifications.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Pawel Karwowski; Jeffrey Pettit; Austin Kevin Barney; Christopher Atalla
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.