| Literature DB >> 28781605 |
S Peli1,2, S Dal Conte3, R Comin4,5, N Nembrini1,2, A Ronchi1,6,7, P Abrami1,6, F Banfi1,6, G Ferrini1,6, D Brida3,8, S Lupi9, M Fabrizio10, A Damascelli4,5, M Capone10, G Cerullo3, C Giannetti1,6.
Abstract
The influence of the Mott physics on the doping-temperature phase diagram of copper oxides represents a major issue that is subject of intense theoretical and experimental effort. Here, we investigate the ultrafast electron dynamics in prototypical single-layer Bi-based cuprates at the energy scale of the O-2p→Cu-3d charge-transfer (CT) process. We demonstrate a clear evolution of the CT excitations from incoherent and localized, as in a Mott insulator, to coherent and delocalized, as in a conventional metal. This reorganization of the high-energy degrees of freedom occurs at the critical doping pcr ≈0.16 irrespective of the temperature, and it can be well described by dynamical mean field theory calculations. We argue that the onset of the low-temperature charge instabilities is the low-energy manifestation of the underlying Mottness that characterizes the p < pcr region of the phase diagram. This discovery sets a new framework for theories of charge order and low-temperature phases in underdoped copper oxides.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28781605 PMCID: PMC5540185 DOI: 10.1038/nphys4112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Phys ISSN: 1745-2473 Impact factor: 20.034
Figure 1Charge-transfer excitation and optical properties of cuprates.
a,b) A sketch of the generic charge-transfer process in the Cu-O layer of copper oxides is shown. The upper (UHB) and lower (LHB) Hubbard bands, corresponding to the Cu-3d10 and Cu-3d9 configurations, are indicated c) The reflectivity curve, R(ω), of the underdoped sample is reported (yellow dots, taken from Refs. 29, 30). The black line is the fit to the data obtained from a model dielectric function which contains an extended-Drude term and three Lorentz oscillators that account for the high-energy transitions. The contribution of the first interband oscillator (ω), attributed to the charge-transfer process, to the total dielectric function is reported as a grey region. The inset displays ω as a function of the hole concentration. The left-bottom inset shows the position of the sample in the p-T phase diagram. The pink line represents the superconducting dome, while the green line indicates the CT insulating region. d) The panel displays the R(ω) of the overdoped sample (blue dots, taken from Refs. 29, 30). The black line is the fit of the model dielectric function to the data. The grey area represents the contribution of the CT oscillator to the dielectric function. The left-bottom inset shows the position of the sample in the p-T phase diagram.
Figure 2Ultrafast optical spectroscopy on La-Bi2201.
a) The top row shows the position of the measured samples in the p-T phase diagram. In the bottom row we report the δR(ω,t)/R maps measured by ultrafast optical spectroscopy on La-Bi2201. The colour scale is reported in the inset. b) Simulation of the δR(ω,t)/R signal for the p=0.12 sample. A transient redshift of the CT oscillator, described by an exponential decay, is assumed. The colour scale is the same than that in panel a). c) δR(ω)/R spectra at different time delays for the p=0.12 sample. The black line is the fit to the data obtained by red-shifting the position of the CT oscillator. For comparison, we report δR(ω)/R for the p=0.16 sample (blue line), along with the best fit obtained by increasing the scattering rate in the Drude model. d) Dynamics of δΔ for the p=0.12 sample. The black line is the fit to the data of a double-exponential decay convoluted with a step function.
Figure 3The high-energy phase diagram of cuprates.
a) The values of the room-temperature CT redshift (δΔ, red dots, left axis) and the intensity of the low-temperature CDW signal (〈ρ〉, blue dots, right axis) are reported as a function of the hole concentration of the La-Bi2201 samples. The excitation fluence of the pump beam has been tuned in order to maintain a constant absorbed energy density of 7 J/cm3 for the different dopings (see Supplementary). The error bars correspond to the uncertainty of the excitation fluence. 〈ρ〉 has been obtained by integrating the difference between the RXS signals measured at the temperatures of 20 K and 300 K at the CDW wavevector17. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the total number of counts in the integration area. The result has been normalized to the total RXS signal at 300 K. Both δΔ and 〈ρ〉 vanish at the critical doping p =0.16±0.01. The uncertainty in the doping concentration represents the maximum and minimum values compatible with the nominal La concentration (x) and the experimental critical temperature, following the procedure described in Ref 53. b) The imaginary part of the electronic self-energy of the UHB (colored squares) is calculated by DMFT and is reported as a function of the doping concentration for different temperatures (300K dark yellow; 20 K green). The calculated electronic compressibility is indicated by colored circles. The full lines are guides to the eye. c) A sketch of the non-equilibrium p-T phase diagram of copper oxides is reported. The pink, blue and green areas delimit the superconducting (SC) dome, the charge-ordered (CDW) state and the antiferromagnetic insulator, respectively.