Literature DB >> 28780533

Nursing home Facebook reviews: who has them, and how do they relate to other measures of quality and experience?

Jennifer Gaudet Hefele1, Yue Li2, Lauren Campbell2, Adrita Barooah1, Joyce Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growing use of social media creates opportunities for patients and families to provide feedback and rate individual healthcare providers. Whereas previous studies have examined this emerging trend in hospital and physician settings, little is known about user ratings of nursing homes (NHs) and how these ratings relate to other measures of quality.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between Facebook user-generated NH ratings and other measures of NH satisfaction/experience and quality.
METHODS: This study compared Facebook user ratings of NHs in Maryland (n=225) and Minnesota (n=335) to resident/family satisfaction/experience survey ratings and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 5-star NH report card ratings.
RESULTS: Overall, 55 NHs in Maryland had an official Facebook page, of which 35 provided the opportunity for users to rate care in the facility. In Minnesota, 126 NHs had a Facebook page, of which 78 allowed for user ratings. NHs with higher aid staffing levels, not affiliated with a chain and located in higher income counties were more likely to have a Facebook page. Facebook ratings were not significantly correlated with the CMS 5-star rating or survey-based resident/family satisfaction ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the disconnect between Facebook ratings and other, more scientifically grounded measures of quality, concerns about the validity and use of social media ratings are warranted. However, it is likely consumers will increasingly turn to social media ratings of NHs, given the lack of consumer perspective on most state and federal report card sites. Thus, social media ratings may present a unique opportunity for healthcare report cards to capture real-time consumer voice. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nursing homes; patient satisfaction; report cards

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28780533     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  4 in total

1.  Do Crowdsourced Hospital Ratings Coincide with Hospital Compare Measures of Clinical and Nonclinical Quality?

Authors:  Victoria Perez; Seth Freedman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The value of Facebook in nation-wide hospital quality assessment: a national mixed-methods study in Norway.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Katrine Damgaard Skyrud; Kirsten Danielsen
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Nursing Homes: Affiliation to Large Chains, Quality and Public-Private Collaboration.

Authors:  Inmaculada Aguiar-Díaz; María Victoria Ruiz-Mallorquí; Beatriz González-López Valcarcel
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Automatic gender detection in Twitter profiles for health-related cohort studies.

Authors:  Yuan-Chi Yang; Mohammed Ali Al-Garadi; Jennifer S Love; Jeanmarie Perrone; Abeed Sarker
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.