Literature DB >> 28780527

Assessment of orientation practices for ethics consultation at Harvard Medical School-affiliated hospitals.

Danish Zaidi1, Jennifer C Kesselheim1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have been conducted to assess the quality of orientation practices for ethics advisory committees that conduct ethics consultation. This survey study focused on several Harvard teaching hospitals, exploring orientation quality and committee members' self-evaluation in the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) ethics consultation competencies.
METHODS: We conducted a survey study that involved 116 members and 16 chairs of ethics advisory committees, respectively (52% and 62.5% response rates). Predictor variables included professional demographics, duration on committees and level of training. Outcome variables included familiarity with and preparedness in the ASBH competencies and satisfaction with orientations. We hypothesised that responses would be associated with both the aforementioned predictors and whether or not participants had encountered the ASBH competencies in training.
RESULTS: A majority of respondents found their orientation curricula to be helpful (62%), although a significant portion of respondents did not receive any orientation (24%) or were unsatisfied with their orientation (14%). Familiarity with ASBH competencies was a statistically significant predictor of respondents' self-evaluation in particular categories (54% had heard of the competencies). Standard educational materials were reported as offered during orientation, such as readings (50%) and case studies (41%); different medium resources were less evidenced such as videos on ethics consultation (19%).
CONCLUSIONS: Institutions should re-evaluate orientation practices for ethics committee members that perform ethics consultation. Integrating ASBH competencies and useful methods into a resourceful pedagogy will help improve both member satisfaction with orientation and preparation in consultation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical ethics; education For health care professionals; ethics committees/consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28780527     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Ethics Consultation in Oncology: The Search for Quality in Quantity.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Andrew Hantel; Gregory A Abel; Jeffrey M Peppercorn
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Siti Mukaumbya Kabanda; Leza Soldaat; Anita Kleinsmidt; Adetayo Emmanuel Obasa; Sharon Kling
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.