Alberto Chiesa1, Teresa Fazia2, Luisa Bernardinelli2, Gabriella Morandi3. 1. Istituto Mente e Corpo, Bologna, Italy; Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva - Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva, Roma, Italy. 2. Department of Brain and Behavioral Science, Medical and Genomic Statistics Unit, University of Pavia, Italy. 3. Department of Brain and Behavioral Science, Medical and Genomic Statistics Unit, University of Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: gabriella.morandi@unipv.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We performed a citation analysis of the literature about mindfulness aimed at describing the most significant topics and the impact of more relevant papers. METHODS: We classified 128 systematic reviews about mindfulness-based intervention retrieved in Scopus according to their object, the population included and the type of mindfulness proposed. The citation counting was reported. The cumulative citation numbers per chronological years and article life were analyzed thorough a linear regression model. RESULTS: 1) We observed a general increase in the number of reviews published from 2003 to 2016; 2) two reviews collected the 33% of the overall citations; 3) citation counting for clinical and mixed population collected the 90% of total citations; 4) clinical reviews had higher cumulative citation per publication/year growth. CONCLUSIONS: As mindfulness research advances, higher attention should be given to the mechanisms by which mindfulness interventions work so as to provide fruitful insights for future research.
OBJECTIVES: We performed a citation analysis of the literature about mindfulness aimed at describing the most significant topics and the impact of more relevant papers. METHODS: We classified 128 systematic reviews about mindfulness-based intervention retrieved in Scopus according to their object, the population included and the type of mindfulness proposed. The citation counting was reported. The cumulative citation numbers per chronological years and article life were analyzed thorough a linear regression model. RESULTS: 1) We observed a general increase in the number of reviews published from 2003 to 2016; 2) two reviews collected the 33% of the overall citations; 3) citation counting for clinical and mixed population collected the 90% of total citations; 4) clinical reviews had higher cumulative citation per publication/year growth. CONCLUSIONS: As mindfulness research advances, higher attention should be given to the mechanisms by which mindfulness interventions work so as to provide fruitful insights for future research.
Authors: Teresa Fazia; Francesco Bubbico; Giovanni Berzuini; Laura Dalla Tezza; Carolina Cortellini; Salvatore Bruno; Luisa Bernardinelli Journal: Work Date: 2021
Authors: Teresa Fazia; Francesco Bubbico; Gerardo Salvato; Giovanni Berzuini; Salvatore Bruno; Gabriella Bottini; Luisa Bernardinelli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Teresa Fazia; Francesco Bubbico; Ioannis Iliakis; Gerardo Salvato; Giovanni Berzuini; Salvatore Bruno; Luisa Bernardinelli Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-10-26