B Almahmeed1, B R Shah1,2,3,4, G Mukerji1,5, V Ling3, G L Booth1,2,3,6,7, D S Feig1,2,3,8. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Women's College Institute of Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care and the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism and the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the relationship between increasing parity and diabetes in a large, population-based cohort, and to examine if this relationship is different among high-risk ethnic groups. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective cohort study was performed in 738 440 women aged 18-50 years, who delivered babies in Ontario between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2011. Diabetes incidence postpartum was calculated for each parity and ethnic group. A multivariable analysis of the effect of parity and ethnicity on the incidence of diabetes was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: The diabetes incidence rate per 1000 person-years was 3.69 in women with 1 delivery, 4.12 in women with 3 deliveries and 7.62 in women with ≥5 deliveries. Women with ≥3 deliveries had a higher risk of developing diabetes compared with women with 1 delivery [adjusted hazard ratios 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.11) for 3 deliveries, 1.33 (95% CI 1.25-1.43) for 4 deliveries and 1.53 (95% CI 1.41-1.66) for ≥5 deliveries). A similar rise in risk could be seen in Chinese and South-Asian women, with the most influence in Chinese women [hazard ratio 4.59 (95% CI 2.36-8.92) for ≥5 deliveries]. CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive and graded relationship between increasing parity and risk of development of diabetes. The influence of parity was seen in all ethnicities. This association may be partly related to increasing weight gain and retention with increasing parity, or deterioration in β-cell function. This merits further exploration.
AIMS: To investigate the relationship between increasing parity and diabetes in a large, population-based cohort, and to examine if this relationship is different among high-risk ethnic groups. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective cohort study was performed in 738 440 women aged 18-50 years, who delivered babies in Ontario between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2011. Diabetes incidence postpartum was calculated for each parity and ethnic group. A multivariable analysis of the effect of parity and ethnicity on the incidence of diabetes was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: The diabetes incidence rate per 1000 person-years was 3.69 in women with 1 delivery, 4.12 in women with 3 deliveries and 7.62 in women with ≥5 deliveries. Women with ≥3 deliveries had a higher risk of developing diabetes compared with women with 1 delivery [adjusted hazard ratios 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.11) for 3 deliveries, 1.33 (95% CI 1.25-1.43) for 4 deliveries and 1.53 (95% CI 1.41-1.66) for ≥5 deliveries). A similar rise in risk could be seen in Chinese and South-Asian women, with the most influence in Chinese women [hazard ratio 4.59 (95% CI 2.36-8.92) for ≥5 deliveries]. CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive and graded relationship between increasing parity and risk of development of diabetes. The influence of parity was seen in all ethnicities. This association may be partly related to increasing weight gain and retention with increasing parity, or deterioration in β-cell function. This merits further exploration.
Authors: Marisa J Perera; Samantha A Reina; Tali Elfassy; JoNell E Potter; Daniela Sotres Alvarez; Melissa A Simon; Carmen R Isasi; Alison M Stuebe; Neil Schneiderman; Maria M Llabre Journal: Women Health Date: 2018-08-09