| Literature DB >> 28779133 |
Andrey Alexandrov1,2, Annarita Buonaura3,4, Lucia Consiglio3, Nicola D'Ambrosio5, Giovanni De Lellis3,4, Antonia Di Crescenzo3,4, Giuliana Galati3,4, Valerio Gentile6, Adele Lauria3,4, Maria Cristina Montesi3,4, Valeri Tioukov3, Mikhailo Vladymyrov7,8, Elena Voevodina3,7,4.
Abstract
In the present paper we report the development of the Continuous Motion scanning technique and its implementation for a new generation of scanning systems. The same hardware setup has demonstrated a significant boost in the scanning speed, reaching 190 cm2/h. The implementation of the Continuous Motion technique in the LASSO framework, as well as a number of new corrections introduced are described in details. The performance of the system, the results of an efficiency measurement and potential applications of the technique are discussed.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28779133 PMCID: PMC5544715 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07869-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Passage of a charged particle through an OPERA-like emulsion film.
Figure 2The schematic representation of the Stop&Go (SG) and the Continuous Motion (CM) scanning techniques.
Figure 3Speed (a) and displacement (b) profiles and scanning phase chart (c) for the SG and the CM techniques. The DAQ phase takes the same time in both techniques while the reset time is drastically reduced in the CM. The plot (d) shows the working cycle time distribution for the FPGA implementation of the CM.
Comparison of LASSO scanning parameters and performances between the SG and the CM techniques.
| Scanning Technique |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Camera frame rate (fps) | 563 | |
| Field of view ( | 805 × 595 | |
| Pixel to micron ratio ( | 0.34 | |
| Sampling step ( | 1.75 | |
| Frames per view | 28 | |
| Scanning depth ( | 49 | |
| Views overlap ( | 30 | |
| DAQ time (ms) | 57 | |
| Reset time (ms) | 102 | 24 |
| Overhead time (ms) | 30 | 0 |
| Working cycle (ms) | 189 | 81 |
| Scanning speed (cm2/hour) | 84 | 190 |
Figure 4Workflow diagram for the CM technique. Thick solid horizontal arrows indicate the execution flow. Thin dashed vertical arrows indicate commands flow directed from client module to server module that executes it. Rectangular boxes represent operations requested.
Figure 5Tracks crossing adjacent views, made of grains in tilted (a) and vertical (b) overlapping piles of images. Dashed arrows represent particle tracks. Solid horizontal lines represent images. Circles represent images of grains detected along the track. Black (white) circles are clusters detected in the left (right) view.
Figure 6Illustration of the view reshaping procedure.
Figure 7Distortion of a vertical and an inclined track passing through emulsion in the SG (a). Distortion (b) and breakage (c) of a vertical track passing through emulsion in the CM. In all figures horizontal lines represent grabbed images. Solid horizontal arrows represent distortion strength and direction. Dashed arrows represent particle tracks. Empty circles represent true positions of grains left by passing through particles. Black circles represent the observed grains positions as they are seen due to optical distortions.
Figure 8Base track reconstruction efficiency (a), angular residuals (b) and position residuals (c) versus track angle measured with a NGSS microscope.