Sherry-Ann N Brown1, Hayan Jouni1, Tariq S Marroush1, Iftikhar J Kullo2. 1. From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.-A.N.B., H.J., T.S.M., I.J.K.). 2. From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.-A.N.B., H.J., T.S.M., I.J.K.). Kullo.Iftikhar@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) to individuals influences information seeking and information sharing is not known. We hypothesized that disclosing genetic risk for CHD to individuals influences information seeking and sharing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The MI-GENES study (Myocardial Infarction Genes) randomized participants (n=203) aged 45 to 65 years who were at intermediate CHD risk based on conventional risk factors and not on statins to receive their conventional risk score alone or also a genetic risk score based on 28 variants. CHD risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor and then discussed with a physician. Surveys assessing information seeking were completed before and after risk disclosure. Information sharing was assessed post-disclosure. Six-month post-disclosure, genetic risk score participants were more likely than conventional risk score participants to visit a website to learn about CHD (odds ratio [OR], 4.88 [confidence interval (CI), 1.55-19.13]; P=0.01), use the internet for information about how genetic factors affect CHD risk (OR, 2.11 [CI, 1.03-4.47]; P=0.04), access their CHD risk via a patient portal (OR, 2.99 [CI, 1.35-7.04]; P=0.01), and discuss their CHD risk with others (OR, 3.13 [CI, 1.41-7.47]; P=0.01), particularly their siblings (OR, 1.92 [CI, 1.06-3.51]; P=0.03), extended family (OR, 3.8 [CI, 1.37-12.38]; P=0.01), coworkers (OR, 2.42 [CI, 1.09-5.76]; P=0.03), and primary care provider (PCP; OR, 2.00 [CI, 1.08-3.75]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of a genetic risk score for CHD increased information seeking and sharing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01936675.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Whether disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) to individuals influences information seeking and information sharing is not known. We hypothesized that disclosing genetic risk for CHD to individuals influences information seeking and sharing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The MI-GENES study (Myocardial Infarction Genes) randomized participants (n=203) aged 45 to 65 years who were at intermediate CHD risk based on conventional risk factors and not on statins to receive their conventional risk score alone or also a genetic risk score based on 28 variants. CHD risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor and then discussed with a physician. Surveys assessing information seeking were completed before and after risk disclosure. Information sharing was assessed post-disclosure. Six-month post-disclosure, genetic risk score participants were more likely than conventional risk score participants to visit a website to learn about CHD (odds ratio [OR], 4.88 [confidence interval (CI), 1.55-19.13]; P=0.01), use the internet for information about how genetic factors affect CHD risk (OR, 2.11 [CI, 1.03-4.47]; P=0.04), access their CHD risk via a patient portal (OR, 2.99 [CI, 1.35-7.04]; P=0.01), and discuss their CHD risk with others (OR, 3.13 [CI, 1.41-7.47]; P=0.01), particularly their siblings (OR, 1.92 [CI, 1.06-3.51]; P=0.03), extended family (OR, 3.8 [CI, 1.37-12.38]; P=0.01), coworkers (OR, 2.42 [CI, 1.09-5.76]; P=0.03), and primary care provider (PCP; OR, 2.00 [CI, 1.08-3.75]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of a genetic risk score for CHD increased information seeking and sharing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01936675.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Iftikhar J Kullo; Hayan Jouni; Erin E Austin; Sherry-Ann Brown; Teresa M Kruisselbrink; Iyad N Isseh; Raad A Haddad; Tariq S Marroush; Khader Shameer; Janet E Olson; Ulrich Broeckel; Robert C Green; Daniel J Schaid; Victor M Montori; Kent R Bailey Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hayan Jouni; Raad A Haddad; Tariq S Marroush; Sherry-Ann Brown; Teresa M Kruisselbrink; Erin E Austin; Khader Shameer; Emma M Behnken; Rajeev Chaudhry; Victor M Montori; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: J Investig Med Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Ashley Elrick; Sato Ashida; Jennifer Ivanovich; Sarah Lyons; Barbara B Biesecker; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert Reid; Eric Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Maria Lukács Krogager; Regitze Kuhr Skals; Emil Vincent R Appel; Theresia M Schnurr; Line Engelbrechtsen; Christian Theil Have; Oluf Pedersen; Thomas Engstrøm; Dan M Roden; Gunnar Gislason; Henrik Enghusen Poulsen; Lars Køber; Steen Stender; Torben Hansen; Niels Grarup; Charlotte Andersson; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Peter E Weeke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.240