Literature DB >> 28778971

Comparing the cancer potencies of emissions from vapourised nicotine products including e-cigarettes with those of tobacco smoke.

William E Stephens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying relative harm caused by inhaling the aerosol emissions of vapourised nicotine products compared with smoking combustible tobacco is an important issue for public health.
METHODS: The cancer potencies of various nicotine-delivering aerosols are modelled using published chemical analyses of emissions and their associated inhalation unit risks. Potencies are compared using a conversion procedure for expressing smoke and e-cigarette vapours in common units. Lifetime cancer risks are calculated from potencies using daily consumption estimates.
RESULTS: The aerosols form a spectrum of cancer potencies spanning five orders of magnitude from uncontaminated air to tobacco smoke. E-cigarette emissions span most of this range with the preponderance of products having potencies<1% of tobacco smoke and falling within two orders of magnitude of a medicinal nicotine inhaler; however, a small minority have much higher potencies. These high-risk results tend to be associated with high levels of carbonyls generated when excessive power is delivered to the atomiser coil. Samples of a prototype heat-not-burn device have lower cancer potencies than tobacco smoke by at least one order of magnitude, but higher potencies than most e-cigarettes. Mean lifetime risks decline in the sequence: combustible cigarettes >> heat-not-burn >> e-cigarettes (normal power)≥nicotine inhaler.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal combinations of device settings, liquid formulation and vaping behaviour normally result in e-cigarette emissions with much less carcinogenic potency than tobacco smoke, notwithstanding there are circumstances in which the cancer risks of e-cigarette emissions can escalate, sometimes substantially. These circumstances are usually avoidable when the causes are known. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogens; electronic nicotine delivery devices; harm reduction; smoking caused disease

Year:  2017        PMID: 28778971     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  44 in total

1.  Three Patients With Acute Pulmonary Damage Following the Use of E-Cigarettes-A Case Series.

Authors:  Hendrik Suhling; Tobias Welte; Thomas Fuehner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Journal Club-Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping as a Harm Reduction Alternative: Really?

Authors:  Ron Balkissoon
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2019-07-24

3.  Philip Morris International introduces new heat-not-burn product, IQOS, in South Korea.

Authors:  Minji Kim
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now: Evidence for harm minimization.

Authors:  David B Abrams; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Shyanika Rose; Raymond S Niaura
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Electronic cigarettes disrupt lung lipid homeostasis and innate immunity independent of nicotine.

Authors:  Matthew C Madison; Cameron T Landers; Bon-Hee Gu; Cheng-Yen Chang; Hui-Ying Tung; Ran You; Monica J Hong; Nima Baghaei; Li-Zhen Song; Paul Porter; Nagireddy Putluri; Ramiro Salas; Brian E Gilbert; Ilya Levental; Matthew J Campen; David B Corry; Farrah Kheradmand
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Electronic cigarette dependence and demand among pod mod users as a function of smoking status.

Authors:  Eleanor L S Leavens; Tracy T Smith; Noelle Natale; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-04-16

7.  Disentangling Within- and Between-Person Effects of Shared Risk Factors on E-cigarette and Cigarette Use Trajectories From Late Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Michael S Dunbar; Jordan P Davis; Anthony Rodriguez; Joan S Tucker; Rachana Seelam; Elizabeth J D'Amico
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Exposure to the Tobacco Power Wall Increases Adolescents' Willingness to Use E-cigarettes in the Future.

Authors:  Michael S Dunbar; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; William G Shadel
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Knowledge and Attitudes Among Medical Students Toward the Clinical Usage of e-Cigarettes: A Cross-Sectional Study in a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sami H Alzahrani; Rawan A Alghamdi; Ahmed Mabruk Almutairi; Ali Ahmed Alghamdi; Abdullah Abdulwahab Aljuhani; Abdulrahman Hamed ALbalawi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  E-cigarette use in England 2014-17 as a function of socio-economic profile.

Authors:  Loren Kock; Lion Shahab; Robert West; Jamie Brown
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.