Literature DB >> 28778946

Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients.

Jeff S Healey1, Marco Alings2, Andrew Ha2, Peter Leong-Sit2, David H Birnie2, Jacob J de Graaf2, Michel Freericks2, Atul Verma2, Jia Wang2, Darryl Leong2, Hisham Dokainish2, Francois Philippon2, Walid Barake2, William F McIntyre2, Kim Simek2, Michael D Hill2, Shamir R Mehta2, Mark Carlson2, Frank Smeele2, A Shekhar Pandey2, Stuart J Connolly2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term continuous electrocardiographic monitoring shows a substantial prevalence of asymptomatic, subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF) in patients with pacemakers and patients with cryptogenic stroke. Whether SCAF is also common in other patients without these conditions is unknown.
METHODS: We implanted subcutaneous electrocardiographic monitors (St. Jude CONFIRM-AF) in patients ≥65 years of age attending cardiovascular or neurology outpatient clinics if they had no history of atrial fibrillation but had any of the following: CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2, sleep apnea, or body mass index >30 kg/m2. Eligibility also required either left atrial enlargement (≥4.4 cm or volume ≥58 mL) or increased (≥290 pg/mL) serum NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Patients were monitored for SCAF lasting ≥5 minutes.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six patients were followed up for 16.3±3.8 months. Baseline age was 74±6 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.1±1.4; left atrial diameter averaged 4.7±0.8 cm; and 48% had a prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. SCAF ≥5 minutes was detected in 90 patients (detection rate, 34.4%/y; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7-42.3). Baseline predictors of SCAF were increased age (hazard ratio [HR] per decade, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.11-2.15), left atrial dimension (HR per centimeter diameter, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.09-1.86), and blood pressure (HR per 10 mm Hg, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98), but not prior stroke. The rate of occurrence of SCAF in those with a history of stroke, systemic embolism, or transient ischemic attack was 39.4%/y versus 30.3%/y without (P=0.32). The cumulative SCAF detection rate was higher (51.9%/y) in those with left atrial volume above the median value of 73.5 mL.
CONCLUSIONS: SCAF is frequently detected by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in older patients without a history of atrial fibrillation who are attending outpatient cardiology and neurology clinics. Its clinical significance is unclear. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01694394.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; monitoring, physiologic; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28778946     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

Review 1.  Population-Based Screening for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Shaan Khurshid; Jeffrey S Healey; William F McIntyre; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Digital health solutions in the screening of subclinical atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sebastian König; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  The changing landscape of thromboprophylaxis for atrial fibrillation: insights from the ISPAF-2 survey.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mulè'; Caterina Carollo; Marco Guarneri; Santina Cottone
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Practice Variation in Anticoagulation Prescription and Outcomes After Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander C Perino; Jun Fan; Mariam Askari; Paul A Heidenreich; Edmund Keung; Merritt H Raitt; Jonathan P Piccini; Paul D Ziegler; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Incidence of Previously Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Using Insertable Cardiac Monitors in a High-Risk Population: The REVEAL AF Study.

Authors:  James A Reiffel; Atul Verma; Peter R Kowey; Jonathan L Halperin; Bernard J Gersh; Rolf Wachter; Erika Pouliot; Paul D Ziegler
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Left Atrial Electromechanical Remodeling Following 2 Years of High-Intensity Exercise Training in Sedentary Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  David A McNamara; Norman Aiad; Erin Howden; Michinari Hieda; Mark S Link; Dean Palmer; Mitchel Samels; Braden Everding; Jason Ng; Beverley Adams-Huet; Mildred Opondo; Satyam Sarma; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Design and rationale of a pragmatic trial integrating routine screening for atrial fibrillation at primary care visits: The VITAL-AF trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Ashburner; Steven J Atlas; David D McManus; Yuchiao Chang; Ana T Trisini Lipsanopoulos; Leila H Borowsky; Wyliena Guan; Wei He; Patrick T Ellinor; Daniel E Singer; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Design and rationale of the atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress (AFOTS) follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Pablo A Mendoza; Emilie P Belley-Côté; Richard P Whitlock; Kevin J Um; Natalie Maystrenko; P J Devereaux; David Conen; Jorge A Wong; Stuart J Connolly; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke Versus Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jens Witsch; Alexander E Merkler; Monica Lin Chen; Babak B Navi; Kevin N Sheth; Ben Freedman; Lee H Schwamm; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation after the first clinical episode: A prospective evaluation using continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring.

Authors:  Emmanuel N Simantirakis; Panteleimon E Papakonstantinou; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Gregory I Chlouverakis; Stylianos Tzeis; Panos E Vardas
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.