Literature DB >> 28778478

Comparing photoporation and nucleofection for delivery of small interfering RNA to cytotoxic T cells.

Laura Wayteck1, Ranhua Xiong2, Kevin Braeckmans3, Stefaan C De Smedt4, Koen Raemdonck5.   

Abstract

The success of cancer immunotherapy through the adoptive transfer of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) is highly dependent on the potency of the elicited anti-tumor responses generated by the transferred cells, which can be hindered by a variety of upregulated immunosuppressive pathways. Downregulation of these pathways in the T cells via RNA interference (RNAi) could significantly boost their capacity to infiltrate tumors, proliferate, persist, and eradicate tumor cells, thus leading to a durable anti-tumor response. Unfortunately, it is well known that primary T cells are hard-to-transfect and conventional non-viral transfection agents are generally ineffective. Viral transduction and electroporation are more efficient but their use is restricted by high cost, safety issues, and cytotoxicity. Photoporation has recently gained interest as a more gentle alternative physical approach to deliver membrane-impermeable macromolecules into cells. By attaching gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to the cell surface followed by pulsed laser illumination, transient membrane pores can be generated that allow the diffusion of macromolecules directly into the cell cytosol. Here, we evaluated this technique for the non-toxic and effective delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and subsequent silencing of target genes in activated CTLs. We compared photoporation with nucleofection, the current standard physical technique for T cell transfection, and demonstrated a significantly reduced cytotoxicity and higher average dose per cell for the photoporation technique.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adoptive T cell therapy; Gold nanoparticles; Photoporation; Vapor nanobubbles; siRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28778478     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  10 in total

1.  Theranostic Nanoparticles for RNA-Based Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Richard A Revia; Zachary R Stephen; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Transient nuclear lamin A/C accretion aids in recovery from vapor nanobubble-induced permeabilisation of the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Winnok H De Vos; Gaëlle Houthaeve; Gerardo García-Díaz Barriga; Stephan Stremersch; Herlinde De Keersmaecker; Juan Fraire; Jo Vandesompele; Pieter Mestdagh; Stefaan De Smedt
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Long-term live-cell microscopy with labeled nanobodies delivered by laser-induced photoporation.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Tim Hebbrecht; Toon Brans; Eef Parthoens; Saskia Lippens; Chengnan Li; Herlinde De Keersmaecker; Winnok H De Vos; Stefaan C De Smedt; Rabah Boukherroub; Jan Gettemans; Ranhua Xiong; Kevin Braeckmans
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 8.897

Review 4.  Targeting Accessories to the Crime: Nanoparticle Nucleic Acid Delivery to the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Emily B Harrison; Salma H Azam; Chad V Pecot
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Repeated photoporation with graphene quantum dots enables homogeneous labeling of live cells with extrinsic markers for fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Ranhua Xiong; Toon Brans; Saskia Lippens; Eef Parthoens; Francesca Cella Zanacchi; Raffaella Magrassi; Santosh K Singh; Sreekumar Kurungot; Sabine Szunerits; Hannelore Bové; Marcel Ameloot; Juan C Fraire; Eline Teirlinck; Sangram Keshari Samal; Riet De Rycke; Gaëlle Houthaeve; Stefaan C De Smedt; Rabah Boukherroub; Kevin Braeckmans
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 17.782

6.  Delivery of Mixed-Lineage Kinase Domain-Like Protein by Vapor Nanobubble Photoporation Induces Necroptotic-Like Cell Death in Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Lien Van Hoecke; Laurens Raes; Stephan Stremersch; Toon Brans; Juan C Fraire; Ria Roelandt; Wim Declercq; Peter Vandenabeele; Koen Raemdonck; Kevin Braeckmans; Xavier Saelens
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Nanotechnology Promotes Genetic and Functional Modifications of Therapeutic T Cells Against Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed M E Abdalla; Lin Xiao; Yu Miao; Lixia Huang; Gendeal M Fadlallah; Mario Gauthier; Chenxi Ouyang; Guang Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 16.806

8.  Plasma membrane perforation by GSDME during apoptosis-driven secondary necrosis.

Authors:  Elke De Schutter; Jana Ramon; Franck B Riquet; Kevin Braeckmans; Peter Vandenabeele; Benjamin Pfeuty; Caroline De Tender; Stephan Stremersch; Koen Raemdonck; Ken Op de Beeck; Wim Declercq
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Nanocarriers for cancer nano-immunotherapy.

Authors:  Isra Rana; Jaeeun Oh; Juwon Baig; Jeong Hyun Moon; Sejin Son; Jutaek Nam
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 10.  The cellular response to plasma membrane disruption for nanomaterial delivery.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Winnok H De Vos; Gaëlle Houthaeve; Stefaan C De Smedt
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2022-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.