Literature DB >> 28778259

Understanding Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review and Practical Guide for the Nondermatologist.

Stanislav N Tolkachjov1, David G Brodland2, Brett M Coldiron3, Michael J Fazio4, George J Hruza5, Randall K Roenigk6, Howard W Rogers7, John A Zitelli2, Daniel S Winchester6, Christopher B Harmon8.   

Abstract

The incidence and diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies are steadily rising. In addition, with the aging population and increasing use of organ transplant and immunosuppressive medications, subsets of patients are now more susceptible to skin cancer. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the standard of care for the treatment of high-risk nonmelanoma skin cancers and is increasingly used to treat melanoma. Mohs micrographic surgery has the highest cure rates, spares the maximal amount of normal tissue, and is cost-effective for the treatment of cutaneous malignancies. As in other medical fields, appropriate use criteria were developed for MMS and have become an evolving guideline for determining which patients and tumors are appropriate for referral to MMS. Patients with cutaneous malignancies often require multidisciplinary care. With the changing landscape of medicine and the rapidly increasing incidence of skin cancer, primary care providers and specialists who do not commonly manage cutaneous malignancies will need to have an understanding of MMS and its role in patient care. This review better familiarizes the medical community with the practice of MMS, its utilization and capabilities, differences from wide excision and vertical section pathology, and cost-effectiveness, and it guides practitioners in the process of appropriately evaluating and determining when patients with skin cancer might be appropriate candidates for MMS.
Copyright © 2017 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28778259     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Development, Technique, and Applications in Cutaneous Malignancies.

Authors:  Eillen Luisa A Chen; Divya Srivastava; Rajiv I Nijhawan
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Micrographic Surgery Allows Fascia Preservation in Dermatofibro-sarcoma Protuberans.

Authors:  Maximilian Gassenmaier; Erik Weber; Ulrike Leiter; Matthias Hahn; Stephan Forchhammer; Hans-Martin Häfner; Alexander Scheu; Claus Garbe; Saskia Schnabl
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: A histology-compared study on 109 specimens.

Authors:  L Grizzetti; F Kuonen
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2022-01-10

4.  Optical imaging guided- 'precision' biopsy of skin tumors: a novel approach for targeted sampling and histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Miguel Cordova; Aditi Sahu; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Chih-Shan Jason Chen; Konstantinos Liopyris; Ayelet Rishpon; Curtis Chen; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  The Treatment of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer with Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy: An Analysis of 2917 Invasive and In Situ Keratinocytic Carcinoma Lesions.

Authors:  Lio Yu; Chad Oh; Christopher R Shea
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 6.  Treatment of keratinocyte carcinoma in elderly patients - a review of the current literature.

Authors:  A J G Leus; M Frie; M S Haisma; J B Terra; B E C Plaat; R J H M Steenbakkers; G B Halmos; E Rácz
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Modular approach in OPHL: are there preoperative predictors?

Authors:  Andy Bertolin; Marco Lionello; Marco Ghizzo; Emanuela Barbero; Erika Crosetti; Giuseppe Rizzotto; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Risk factors for local atypical fibroxanthoma recurrence and progression to pleomorphic dermal sarcoma: A meta-analysis of individualized participant data.

Authors:  Mathias Ørholt; Frederik L Aaberg; Kiya Abebe; S Walsh; Randall K Roenigk; Alessandro Venzo; Grethe Schmidt; Helle Klyver; David H Jensen; Mikkel Herly; Peter V Vester-Glowinski
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.885

9.  Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Felipe Bochnia Cerci; Elisa Mayumi Kubo; Betina Werner
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 1.896

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.