| Literature DB >> 28778217 |
Julia C Dunn1,2, Alison A Bettis3,4, Nay Yee Wyine4, Aye Moe Moe Lwin5, Soe Thiha Lwin6, Khine Khine Su6, Myint Myint Sein5, Aung Tun7, Nay Soe Maung5, Roy M Anderson3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are still highly prevalent in southeast Asia. The country of Myanmar has had ongoing mass drug administration (MDA) programmes since 2003 in an attempt to control STH and reduce STH-related morbidities. Whilst the MDA programmes have reported high nationwide coverage, there have been no epidemiological surveys that included measurements from adults. This paper details three cross-sectional surveys that took place over the course of a year in two villages endemic for STH and receiving MDA in lower Myanmar.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-sectional survey; Mass drug administration; Myanmar; Neglected tropical diseases; Soil-transmitted helminths
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28778217 PMCID: PMC5543579 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2306-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of Myanmar and the study villages. a Udo village, Taikkyi township, Yangon Region. b Kyee Kan Theik village, Nyaung Don township, Ayeyarwaddy Region. Circles indicate individual households
Study participant characteristics
| Characteristic | Udo village | Kyee Kan Theik village | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Individuals | 305 | 100 | 407 | 100 | |
| Sex | Male | 131 | 42.95 | 196 | 48.16 |
| Female | 174 | 57.05 | 211 | 51.84 | |
| Age group (years) | 2–4 | 20 | 6.56 | 33 | 8.11 |
| 5–14 | 60 | 19.67 | 98 | 24.08 | |
| 15–24 | 36 | 11.80 | 41 | 10.07 | |
| 25–39 | 67 | 21.97 | 107 | 26.29 | |
| 40+ | 122 | 40.00 | 128 | 31.45 | |
| Households | 114 | 100 | 137 | 100 | |
| Household monthly incomea | < 50,000 MMK | 7 | 6.14 | 36 | 26.28 |
| 50,000–100,000 MMK | 55 | 48.25 | 64 | 46.72 | |
| 100,000–500,000 MMK | 48 | 42.11 | 31 | 22.63 | |
| > 500,000 MMK | 2 | 1.75 | 3 | 2.19 | |
| Do not know/refused to answer | 2 | 1.75 | 3 | 2.19 | |
| Overall household sizeb | 1–4 | 53 | 46.49 | 79 | 57.66 |
| 5–8 | 58 | 50.88 | 52 | 37.96 | |
| 9+ | 3 | 2.63 | 6 | 4.38 | |
| Main source of water | Bottled water | 5 | 4.39 | 0 | 0 |
| Piped water (into home/compound) | 3 | 2.63 | 8 | 5.84 | |
| Well (protected/unprotected) | 3 | 2.63 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rain water (covered/uncovered) | 1 | 0.88 | 0 | 0 | |
| Surface water | 0 | 0.00 | 99 | 72.26 | |
| Tubewell/borehole | 100 | 87.72 | 27 | 19.71 | |
| Public tap | 1 | 0.88 | 1 | 0.73 | |
| Other | 1 | 0.88 | 0 | 0 | |
| Do not know/refused | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.46 | |
| Type of toilet | Bucket | 2 | 1.75 | 11 | 8.03 |
| Composting toilet | 13 | 11.40 | 10 | 7.30 | |
| Flush toilet | 56 | 49.12 | 59 | 43.06 | |
| Open pit | 1 | 0.88 | 2 | 1.46 | |
| Pit latrine with slab | 30 | 26.32 | 46 | 33.58 | |
| VIP | 12 | 10.53 | 9 | 6.57 | |
aCumulative income from all members of the household
bIncluding non-participants
Abbreviations: MMK, Myanmar kyats (1 USD to 1111 MMK, June 2015); VIP, ventilated improved pit latrine
Number of participants (n), prevalence (%) and infection intensity of each soil-transmitted helminth
| Any STH |
|
| Hookworm | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| % (95% CI)a |
| % (95% CI) | Mean EPG |
| % (95% CI) | Mean EPG |
| % (95% CI) | Mean EPG (95% CI) | ||
| Overall | 712 | 198 | 27.81 (24.54–31.26) | 38 | 5.34 (3.80–7.25) | 1173.40 (610.36–2712.98) | 129 | 18.12 (15.36–21.15) | 66.27 (45.97–103.08) | 62 | 8.71 (6.74–11.02) | 33.88 (20.56–73.34) | |
| Sex | Male | 385 | 93 | 28.44 (23.61–33.66) | 10 | 3.06 (1.48–5.55) | 203.82 (72.36–592.41) | 52 | 15.90 (12.11–20.32) | 42.20 (26.47–69.77) | 43 | 13.15 (9.68–17.30) | 63.78 (35.89–145.84) |
| Female | 327 | 105 | 27.27 (22.88–32.01) | 28 | 7.27 (4.89–10.34) | 1996.92 (947.23–5134.87) | 77 | 20.00 (16.12–24.35) | 86.71 (52.28–154.21) | 19 | 4.94 (3.00–7.60) | 8.48 (4.80–14.96) | |
| Age group (years) | 2–4 | 53 | 12 | 22.64 (12.28–36.21) | 3 | 5.66 (1.18–15.66) | 2416.75 (127.70–11,117.89) | 9 | 16.98 (8.07–29.80) | 62.49 (27.62–123.62) | 2 | 3.77 (0.46–12.98) | 47.09 (0.00–141.28) |
| 5–14 | 158 | 57 | 36.08 (28.6–44.09) | 16 | 10.13 (5.90–15.92) | 3746.43 (1524.27–10,976.88) | 48 | 30.38 (23.32–38.19) | 156.46 (92.96–283.56) | 2 | 1.27 (0.15–4.50) | 2.13 (0.00–7.59) | |
| 15–24 | 77 | 24 | 31.17 (21.09–42.74) | 5 | 6.49 (2.14–14.51) | 849.35 (141.82–3466.98) | 16 | 20.78 (12.37–31.54) | 141.82 (34.60–469.19) | 9 | 11.69 (5.49–21.03) | 21.82 (9.66–45.29) | |
| 25–39 | 174 | 48 | 27.59 (21.09–34.86) | 4 | 2.30 (0.63–5.78) | 71.45 (15.72–272.93) | 28 | 16.09 (10.97–22.41) | 17.52 (10.90–27.81) | 22 | 12.64 (8.10–18.51) | 66.76 (23.59–257.37) | |
| 40+ | 250 | 57 | 22.80 (17.75–28.51) | 10 | 4.00 (1.93–7.23) | 150.43 (39.46–434.28) | 28 | 11.20 (7.57–15.78) | 20.74 (11.33–41.75) | 27 | 10.80 (7.24–15.32) | 31.97 (16.90–62.94) | |
a% represents the percentage positive in each group
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EPG, eggs per gram of faeces; STH, soil-transmitted helminth
Fig. 2Mean log faecal egg counts against log faecal egg count variance. a Ascaris lumbricoides. b Trichuris trichiura. c Hookworm. Each data point represents a five-year age group of all participants with Kato-Katz data at baseline (n = 712). The shaded areas denote the standard error limits. Lines of best fit and formulae derived by linear regression
Fig. 3Burden of STH infection within age groups. a Proportion of positive individuals for each STH within age groups. b Proportion of total EPG of each STH within age groups. Key: Pre-SAC, preschool-aged children (2–4 years old); SAC, school-aged children (5–14 years old); Adults (15+ years old). Labels denote percentage within each STH