Literature DB >> 28778012

Polarity-specific transcranial direct current stimulation effects on object-selective neural responses in the inferior parietal lobe.

Jorge Almeida1, Ana R Martins2, Fredrik Bergström2, Lénia Amaral2, Andreia Freixo2, Ana Ganho-Ávila2, Stephanie Kristensen2, Dongha Lee2, Joana Nogueira2, Michaela Ruttorf3.   

Abstract

Neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are routinely used for treating neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, and for enhancement of cognitive abilities. Recently, their effectiveness in modulating behavioral and neural responses has been questioned. Here we use excitatory and inhibitory tDCS prior to a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment to show that neural responses for an area's preferred stimuli depend on the polarity of stimulation. This is an important, yet overlooked, data point in demonstrating the effectiveness of these stimulation techniques. Our results show that response preferences in the target area are dependent on the polarity of the tDCS session preceding the fMRI experiment - these preferences are less distinct in the cathodal than in the anodal session. As such, we show unequivocally that tDCS modulates neural responses. This result is of the utmost importance in demonstrating the effectiveness of tDCS for clinical and experimental purposes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPL; Neuromodulation; Tools; fMRI; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28778012     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  3 in total

Review 1.  A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement.

Authors:  Hamed Ekhtiari; Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari; Axel Thielscher; Andrea Antal; Lucia M Li; A Duke Shereen; Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Daniel Keeser; Til Ole Bergmann; Asif Jamil; Ines R Violante; Jorge Almeida; Marcus Meinzer; Hartwig R Siebner; Adam J Woods; Charlotte J Stagg; Rany Abend; Daria Antonenko; Tibor Auer; Marc Bächinger; Chris Baeken; Helen C Barron; Henry W Chase; Jenny Crinion; Abhishek Datta; Matthew H Davis; Mohsen Ebrahimi; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Brian Falcone; Valentina Fiori; Iman Ghodratitoostani; Gadi Gilam; Roland H Grabner; Joel D Greenspan; Georg Groen; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tobias U Hauser; Christoph S Herrmann; Chi-Hung Juan; Bart Krekelberg; Stephanie Lefebvre; Sook-Lei Liew; Kristoffer H Madsen; Rasoul Mahdavifar-Khayati; Nastaran Malmir; Paola Marangolo; Andrew K Martin; Timothy J Meeker; Hossein Mohaddes Ardabili; Marius Moisa; Davide Momi; Beni Mulyana; Alexander Opitz; Natasza Orlov; Patrick Ragert; Christian C Ruff; Giulio Ruffini; Michaela Ruttorf; Arshiya Sangchooli; Klaus Schellhorn; Gottfried Schlaug; Bernhard Sehm; Ghazaleh Soleimani; Hosna Tavakoli; Benjamin Thompson; Dagmar Timmann; Aki Tsuchiyagaito; Martin Ulrich; Johannes Vosskuhl; Christiane A Weinrich; Mehran Zare-Bidoky; Xiaochu Zhang; Benedikt Zoefel; Michael A Nitsche; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 17.021

2.  The effect of cathodal tDCS on fear extinction: A cross-measures study.

Authors:  Ana Ganho-Ávila; Óscar F Gonçalves; Raquel Guiomar; Paulo Sérgio Boggio; Manish Kumar Asthana; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Jorge Almeida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  HD-tDCS of primary and higher-order motor cortex affects action word processing.

Authors:  Karim Johari; Nicholas Riccardi; Svetlana Malyutina; Mirage Modi; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.