INTRODUCTION: Functional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access for end-stage renal disease patients. AVF maturation is variable and many require additional interventions to achieve functionality. Long-term benefits of such interventions are unclear. Using a protocol for AVF planning, creation, maturation evaluation and performing interventions based on objective findings along with maintaining a database on follow-up is necessary to evaluate this question.The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of newly constructed AVFs using a protocol-based approach in a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: This is an observational study. Long-term outcomes of consecutive AVFs placed over a 5-year period using a protocol for creation, maturation evaluation and interventions based on objective findings were analyzed using a prospectively maintained clinical database. RESULTS: Functioning AVFs were achieved in 86.5% (n = 296) of 342 patients. Primary and secondary patency of 372 AVF procedures at 12, 24 and 60 months were 42.8%, 31.6% and 20.8%; and 81.8%, 77.6% and 71.7%, respectively. Functional patency at 12, 24 and 60 months were 95.1%, 88.7%, and 85.2%, respectively. Long-term function was similar for AVFs maturing with ≤4 interventions and without interventions. AVFs maturing with 2-4 interventions needed significantly more interventions to maintain long-term functional patency (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Piggyback straight-line on-lay technique (pSLOT) improves early outcome providing opportunity to identify other problems contributing to non-maturation. A large number of AVFs needing planned interventions to mature provide good long-term function. Establishing process of care guidelines for creation and follow-up has a potential to improve AVF outcome.
INTRODUCTION:Functional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access for end-stage renal diseasepatients. AVF maturation is variable and many require additional interventions to achieve functionality. Long-term benefits of such interventions are unclear. Using a protocol for AVF planning, creation, maturation evaluation and performing interventions based on objective findings along with maintaining a database on follow-up is necessary to evaluate this question.The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of newly constructed AVFs using a protocol-based approach in a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: This is an observational study. Long-term outcomes of consecutive AVFs placed over a 5-year period using a protocol for creation, maturation evaluation and interventions based on objective findings were analyzed using a prospectively maintained clinical database. RESULTS: Functioning AVFs were achieved in 86.5% (n = 296) of 342 patients. Primary and secondary patency of 372 AVF procedures at 12, 24 and 60 months were 42.8%, 31.6% and 20.8%; and 81.8%, 77.6% and 71.7%, respectively. Functional patency at 12, 24 and 60 months were 95.1%, 88.7%, and 85.2%, respectively. Long-term function was similar for AVFs maturing with ≤4 interventions and without interventions. AVFs maturing with 2-4 interventions needed significantly more interventions to maintain long-term functional patency (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Piggyback straight-line on-lay technique (pSLOT) improves early outcome providing opportunity to identify other problems contributing to non-maturation. A large number of AVFs needing planned interventions to mature provide good long-term function. Establishing process of care guidelines for creation and follow-up has a potential to improve AVF outcome.