Literature DB >> 28777136

Incidence and Impact of On-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Vasoplegia During Heart Transplantation.

Lauren K Truby, Koji Takeda, Maryjane Farr, James Beck, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, Veli K Topkara, Donna Mancini, Yoshifumi Naka, Hiroo Takayama.   

Abstract

Despite significant advances in the medical management of heart transplant (HT) recipients, perioperative complications, including vasoplegia, remain a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. This is a retrospective review of patients who received HT at our institution between 2012 and 2015. Mean systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated during the bypass run. Vasoplegia was defined as a mean SVR <800 dynes s/cm despite a high pressor requirement (>1,500 μg neosynephrine bolused). The primary outcome of interest was 30 day post-transplant survival. There were 138 patients included in the current study. A total of 16% (n = 22) patients were identified as having developed on-cardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia. Vasoplegic patients had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (30.1 ± 5.0 vs. 26.5 ± 4.7; p = 0.005) and were more likely to be male (95.5% vs. 66.4%; p = 0.004). Use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) was prevalent among vasoplegic patients (81.8% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.033). These patients had significantly decreased survival at 30 and 60 days (86.4% vs. 99.1% at 30 days; 77.3% vs. 92.8% at 60 days). Bridge-to-transplant with CF-LVAD was an independent predictor of on-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vasoplegia. On-CPB vasoplegia complicated 16% of HTs in the current study and was associated with increased mortality. Bridge-to-transplant with CF-LVAD was an independent predictor of this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28777136     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality.

Authors:  Lauren K Truby; Maryjane A Farr; A Reshad Garan; Raymond Givens; Susan W Restaino; Farhana Latif; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Vasoplegia from Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Shyama Sathianathan; Geetha Bhat; Robert Dowling
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Vasoplegia following heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device explant is not associated with inferior outcomes.

Authors:  Jason M Ali; Serena Patel; Pedro Catarino; Alain Vuylsteke; Stephen Pettit; Sai Bhagra; Anna Kydd; Clive Lewis; Jayan Parameshwar; Pradeep Kaul; Catherine Sudarshan; Steven Tsui; David Jenkins; Yasir Abu-Omar; Marius Berman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Vasoplegia in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Hilmi Alnsasra; Richard C Daly; Sarah D Schettle; Alexandros Briasoulis; Riad Taher; Shannon M Dunlay; John M Stulak; Atta Behfar; Naveen L Pereira; Robert P Frantz; Brooks S Edwards; Alfredo L Clavell; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  ARNI Pre-Operative Use and Vasoplegic Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation or Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.

Authors:  Lamis Haider; Elisabeth Hugon-Vallet; Jean Philippe Constantin; Zakaria Riad; Laurent Sebbag; Nathan Mewton
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.