Differences in Dihydrotetrabenazine Isomer Concentrations Following Administration of Tetrabenazine and Valbenazine.

BACKGROUND: Tetrabenazine (TBZ) activity is thought to result from four isomeric dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) metabolites ([+]-α-HTBZ, [-]-α-HTBZ, [+]-β-HTBZ, [-]-β-HTBZ). Each isomer has a unique profile of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibition and off-target binding. Previously published data only report total isomer (α) and (β) concentrations. We developed a method to quantify the individual HTBZ isomers in samples from patients with Huntington's disease receiving TBZ. For comparison, concentrations of [+]-α-HTBZ, the single active metabolite shared by valbenazine (VBZ) and TBZ, were determined in samples from patients with tardive dyskinesia receiving VBZ.
METHODS: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for quantitation of the four individual HTBZ isomers. Concentrations were determined in serum from patients with Huntington's disease administered TBZ and plasma from patients with tardive dyskinesia administered VBZ once daily.
RESULTS: In patients administered TBZ, [-]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ were the most abundant HTBZ isomers while [-]-β-HTBZ and [+]-α-HTBZ were present as minor metabolites. Only [+]-α-HTBZ was observed in patients administered VBZ.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on relative abundance and potency, [+]-β-HTBZ appears to be the primary contributor to VMAT2 inhibition by TBZ, a finding in contrast with the generally held assertion that [+]-α-HTBZ is the major contributor. [-]-α-HTBZ, the other abundant TBZ metabolite, has much lower VMAT2 inhibitory potency than [+]-β-HTBZ, but increased affinity for other CNS targets, which may contribute to off-target effects of TBZ. In contrast, pharmacological activity for VBZ is derived primarily from [+]-α-HTBZ. Individual HTBZ isomer concentrations provide a more clinically relevant endpoint for assessing on- and off-target effects of TBZ than total isomer concentrations.

Key Points

Introduction

Modulation of dopamine pathways via inhibition of vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) is clinically relevant for several neurologic conditions, including Huntington’s disease, tardive dyskinesia, and Tourette syndrome [1]. Understanding of the pharmacology of VMAT2 inhibition first emerged from early work with reserpine in the 1940s and then subsequently with discovery of tetrabenazine (TBZ) in the 1950s [2]. Reserpine was found to be a non-selective covalent inhibitor of both VMAT1 and VMAT2 and was associated with reduced monoamine release centrally and peripherally. This combination of effects is associated with hypotension (associated with reduced norepinephrine) and multiple adverse effects in the CNS due to extensive neuronal monoamine depletion [3]. TBZ provided the desirable selectivity for VMAT2 over VMAT1, and avoided severe hypotension, but TBZ was associated with a clinical risk of depression, parkinsonism, sedation, and akathisia [4], some of which may, in part, be due to off-target (non-VMAT2) effects of TBZ and/or its metabolites.

A variety of studies have demonstrated that reserpine and TBZ bind at different sites on VMAT2 [5]. Reserpine causes prolonged and extensive inhibition of pre-synaptic monoamine release due to its nature of covalent binding to VMAT2. In contrast, TBZ is a non-covalent reversible inhibitor of VMAT2 [6]. TBZ is administered as a racemic mixture of two stereoisomers. Racemic TBZ itself is not directly responsible for the pharmacologic effects, but rather, its pharmacologic activity is a consequence of active metabolites of TBZ [7, 8]. Originally these metabolites were described in toto as dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ). It was subsequently reported that there were four HTBZ stereoisomers that arise from the two chiral centers in racemic TBZ and from the additional chiral center introduced by reduction of the ketone moiety of TBZ by carbonyl reductase to form the secondary alcohol HTBZ stereoisomers: [+]-α-HTBZ, also called (2R,3R,11bR)-HTBZ; [−]-α-HTBZ or (2S,3S,11bS)-HTBZ; [+]-β-HTBZ or (2S,3R,11bR)-HTBZ; and [−]-β-HTBZ or (2R,3S,11bS)-HTBZ (Fig. 1). Although these metabolites have been synthesized and purified to assess the pharmacological activity of the individual stereoisomers [7, 9], no analytical methods have been developed to date capable of quantifying the circulating levels of the individual HTBZ stereoisomers following TBZ administration. In fact, current published data for TBZ, and its deuterated analog (deutetrabenazine), report only the combined concentrations of enantiomeric pairs of metabolites, historically referred to as α-HTBZ (comprising both [+]-α-HTBZ and [−]-α-HTBZ) and β-HTBZ (comprising both [+]-β-HTBZ, and [−]-β-HTBZ).

Fig. 1

Formation of dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) from tetrabenazine and valbenazine

It had previously been assumed that administration of TBZ likely produced inhibition of VMAT2 primarily via the α-HTBZ isomers [10-12], with no indication of the relative contributions of each α-HBTZ enantiomer, no rationale for assuming the β-HTBZ isomers did not significantly contribute to VMAT2 inhibition, and very little discussion of the ‘off-target’ binding of each of the four individual isomers at other transporters or receptors that could be clinically relevant. Very recent data indicate that these four metabolites indeed have important differences in their pharmacologic profile that may contribute to safety and efficacy of TBZ or other VMAT2 inhibitors [7]. Specifically, the off-target pharmacology of some isomers confirms antagonist activity at dopamine D2 and serotonergic receptors that may be associated with CNS risks, including tardive dyskinesia [7, 13]. It had previously been proposed that exposure to clinically relevant concentrations of dopamine receptor antagonism was not relevant to TBZ use [14], although there was no data associated with the stereoisomer-specific metabolite concentrations to support this claim.

Valbenazine (VBZ), a selective VMAT2 inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia, forms a single HTBZ isomer ([+]-α-HTBZ) which is its active metabolite. As shown in Fig. 1, VBZ is administered as a single isomer which generates [+]-α-HTBZ via hydrolysis, a process that does not generate an additional chiral center. The HTBZ isomer formed by VBZ is one of the four possible HTBZ isomers formed by TBZ. As VBZ and TBZ both form HTBZ isomers as active VMAT2 inhibitory metabolites and are in clinical use for movement disorders, a comparison of the exposures of HTBZ isomers formed by these two drugs is of interest.

In the current study, to quantify the levels of each independent HTBZ isomer from TBZ, we report the development of a novel liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method capable of quantifying the four HTBZ isomers from human serum/plasma at clinically relevant concentrations. This methodology was then used to assess the concentrations of the individual HTBZ isomers in serum samples collected from patients with Huntington’s disease following their normal course of treatment with TBZ. Absolute isomer concentrations and relative abundances following TBZ administration were contrasted with isomer concentrations observed in plasma samples collected from patients with tardive dyskinesia who were administered the selective VMAT2 inhibitor VBZ once daily. The potential for each isomer to contribute to on- and off-target activity was assessed based on individual isomer concentration values and reported transporter and receptor binding profiles.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Serum samples from three patients with Huntington’s disease reported to be taking either TBZ 12.5 or 25 mg (Table 1) were purchased from a commercial specimen bank (BioReclamations IVT, Hicksville, NY, USA). All donors provided consent using an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved consent form.

Table 1

Characteristics of Huntington’s patients taking tetrabenazine

Parameter	Subject 1	Subject 2	Subject 3
Gender	Male	Female	Female
Age, years	50	40	63
Race	Caucasian	Caucasian	Caucasian
Co-medications	Oxcarbazepine 300 mg Simvastatin 10 mgDocusate 100 mgLorazepam 0.5 mgVitamin D3Aspirin 81 mgBupropion 150 mg	Sertraline 100 mgClonazepam 2 mg	Donepezil 10 mgBupropion 150 mgClonazepam 0.5 mgCitalopram 40 mg
Tetrabenazine dose, mg	12.5	25	12.5

Plasma samples were obtained from patients with tardive dyskinesia who received VBZ at doses of either 40 or 80 mg once daily for 48 weeks during a long-term open-label study [15]. Samples were collected between 2 and 10 h after dose administration. For the purposes of this report, equal volumes of plasma samples from five patients per dose level were combined to generate 40 and 80-mg pooled samples. Samples from different subjects were pooled due to limited sample availability.

Bioanalytical Method

Serum (TBZ) and plasma (VBZ) samples and matrix-matched standards and quality controls (QCs) were analyzed using an LC-MS/MS method with pre-column chiral derivatization. Briefly, isotopically labeled (3 × 13C) internal standards of all four HTBZ isomers were added to 50 µL serum/plasma samples, matrix standards, and/or QC samples. Protein precipitation and phospholipid removal was performed using an Ostro protein precipitation plate (Waters, Millford, MA, USA), 96-well format, with 25-mg sorbent per well. Extracts were dried under nitrogen at 40 °C and derivatized at ambient temperature in sealed vials for at least 16 h with constant agitation following the addition of 125 µL of (1S)-(−)-camphanic acid chloride at 50 mg/mL in acetonitrile and 25 µL pyridine. After quenching by addition of 30 µL of water, solid phase extraction (SPE) was performed to remove excess derivatizing reagents using an Oasis HLB Prime (Waters, Millford, MA, USA) 96-well plate with 30 mg of sorbent per well. The SPE plate was pre-conditioned in multiple steps as follows: 1 mL of 5% methanol/95% water; 2 × 1 mL 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.5; 2 × 1 mL water; 1 mL methanol; and 2 × 1 mL 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.5. Quenched samples were added to 1320 µL of 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.5, mixed, and then loaded into the pre-conditioned SPE plate. The SPE plate was washed with 1 mL of 5% methanol/95% water, then eluted with 2 × 0.5 mL of 10% methanol/90% acetonitrile with 1% formic acid. The eluent was dried under nitrogen at 40 °C for approximately 1 h or until completely dry. Extracts were reconstituted in 300 µL of 10% acetonitrile/90% water for LC-MS/MS analysis.

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an instrument comprising a CTC PAL Autosampler (Leap Technologies Inc., Carroboro, NC, USA) and an Agilent 1290 Binary LC pump (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to a Sciex API 4000 Qtrap mass spectrometer (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed using an Acquity BEH C18 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm column (Waters, Millford, MA, USA) using gradient conditions at a total flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient method started with an initial hold at 24% B for 0.3 min, linearly increased to 31% B over 10 min with a 0.2-min hold, followed by a step to 70% B with a 1-min hold, and finally a 5-min re-equilibration time at initial conditions. All analytes and internal standards were analyzed in positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode using optimized multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) conditions. MRM channels monitored included derivatized HTBZ isomers (500.1 > 302.2) and derivatized 13C-labeled analogs of HTBZ internal standards (503.2 > 305.2); dwell times of 65 msec were used for all MRM transitions. Optimized mass spectrometer source settings included Turbo Ion Spray (TIS) source temperature, 500 °C; TIS voltage of 5500 V; curtain gas, 25 psi; ion source gas 1 (GS1), 60 psi; ion source gas 2 (GS2), 50 psi. Instrument data acquisition and analysis was performed using Analyst 1.6.2 software (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Quantification was performed using the internal standard method by determining the peak area ratios for the derivatized HTBZ isomer (500.1 > 302.2) peaks to the corresponding derivatized 13C-labeled analogs of HTBZ internal standard (503.2 > 305.2) peaks. HTBZ isomer concentration values were interpolated from the standard curve over a concentration range of 0.244–125 ng/mL.

Bioanalytical Method Validation

The method was validated with respect to selectivity, matrix effects, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, intra- and inter-day variability, to demonstrate that the method was acceptable for exploratory analysis of HTBZ isomers in human serum and plasma. Individual batches consisted of a single matrix, either serum or plasma, and included blanks (double and control), standard curves, and QCs as shown in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5. Interference from endogenous matrix components was assessed using blank human serum and plasma from multiple lots. Matrix interference due to lipemia was evaluated using visually lipemic human serum. TBZ was included as a potential interference in all serum QCs, and VBZ as a potential interference in all plasma QCs. Isotopically labeled analogs (3 × 13C-labeled) of each individual HTBZ isomer were used as internal standards to correct for extraction and derivatization efficiency. Batches were considered to be acceptable if the following criteria were met: the standard curve was linear with a coefficient of determination (r 2) value of the regression line ≥0.98; the average relative errors (RE) of each calibration standard used in the regression performed to establish the calibration curve was within ±20% of its theoretical concentration; and the percent coefficient of variation (CV) at each QC level was ≤20%. For a given batch the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was defined as the concentration of the lowest standard used for generation of the calibration curve.

Table 2

Calibration precision and accuracy results for HTBZ isomer standards in human seruma

Analyte	Standard
	Std1	Std2	Std3	Std4	Std5	Std6	Std7	Std8	Std9	Std10
Nominal concentration (ng/mL)	0.244	0.488	0.977	1.95	3.91	7.81	15.6	31.3	62.5	125
[+]-α-HTBZ
Mean	0.242	0.489	0.924	2.00	3.83	7.77	16.0	32.6	62.1	122
SD	0.01	0.03	0.06	0.12	0.23	0.47	0.69	2.3	3.2	3.0
CV, %	2.7	5.9	6.8	6.1	6.0	6.1	4.3	7.0	5.1	2.4
RE, %	−0.79	0.08	−5.4	2.6	−2.1	−0.61	2.5	4.3	−0.64	−2.4
N	5	3	4	6	6	6	6	5	6	6
[−]-α-HTBZ
Mean	0.238	0.521	0.906	1.98	3.98	7.86	15.1	33.1	62.0	120
SD	0.02	0.01	0.05	0.10	0.39	0.42	0.62	2.4	3.0	3.2
CV, %	7.1	1.9	5.7	4.9	9.7	5.3	4.1	7.2	4.9	2.7
RE, %	−2.7	6.6	−7.3	1.4	1.8	0.65	−3.3	5.8	−0.83	−3.9
N	5	3	4	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
[+]-β-HTBZ
Mean	0.242	0.470	0.993	2.00	3.81	8.32	15.8	31.6	58.3	123
SD	0.02	0.08	0.11	0.25	0.31	0.34	1.2	2.4	3.9	11
CV, %	7.3	18	11	12	8.0	4.1	7.5	7.6	6.7	8.6
RE, %	−1.0	−3.7	1.7	2.5	−2.5	6.5	1.3	1.2	−6.7	−1.6
N	4	3	4	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
[−]-β-HTBZ
Mean	0.245	0.467	0.920	1.98	4.10	7.38	16.2	32.5	63.2	119
SD	0.01	0.06	0.07	0.18	0.40	0.48	1.2	2.8	6.3	3.6
CV, %	5.5	13	7.8	9.2	9.8	6.5	7.5	8.6	10	3.0
RE, %	0.27	−4.4	−5.8	1.3	5.0	−5.5	3.9	3.9	1.2	−5.1
N	5	3	4	6	6	6	6	6	6	6

CV coefficient of variation (measure of precision), HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, N number of replicates, RE relative error (measure of accuracy), SD standard deviation

aIncludes data from four calibration batches

Table 3

Intra-day and inter-day assay precision and accuracy results for quality control samples of HTBZ isomers in human serum

Analyte	Nominal concentration (ng/mL)	Intra-day assaya					Inter-day assayb
		Mean	SD	CV, %	RE, %	N	Mean	SD	CV, %	RE, %	N
[+]-α-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.683	0.03	4.4	−9.0	3	0.736	0.08	10	−1.9	15
MQC	7.50	7.19	0.21	2.9	−4.2	3	7.73	0.43	5.6	3.1	12
HQC	75.0	71.2	0.50	0.7	−5.1	3	74.7	4.0	5.3	−0.42	15
LHQC	75.0	72.4	2.6	3.6	−3.5	3	73.3	4.7	6.4	−2.3	15
[−]-α-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.644	0.01	1.3	−14.2	3	0.657	0.03	3.8	−12	15
MQC	7.50	6.52	NC	NC	−13.1	2	6.97	0.43	6.2	−7.1	11
HQC	75.0	67.1	5.4	8.1	−10.5	3	70.0	7.1	10	−6.7	15
LHQC	75.0	65.7	NC	NC	−12.4	2	67.7	3.9	5.7	−9.7	13
[+]-β-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.629	NC	NC	−16.1	2	0.689	0.07	11	−8.1	14
MQC	7.50	6.95	0.28	4.1	−7.3	3	7.40	0.51	6.8	−1.4	12
HQC	75.0	69.5	4.8	6.9	−7.4	3	74.2	6.4	8.6	−1.0	14
LHQC	75.0	72.8	2.0	2.7	−3.0	3	74.7	5.4	7.2	−0.4	15
[−]-β-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.625	0.02	2.7	−16.7	3	0.673	0.07	11	−10	15
MQC	7.50	6.47	0.26	4.0	−13.7	3	6.96	0.62	8.8	−7.2	12
HQC	75.0	68.8	0.36	0.5	−8.3	3	71.6	5.4	7.5	−4.6	15
LHQC	75.0	70.4	3.8	5.4	−6.2	3	73.3	5.7	7.7	−2.3	15

CV coefficient of variation (measure of precision), HQC high QC concentration, HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, LHQC lipemic high QC concentration, LQC low QC concentration, MQC medium QC concentration, N number of replicates, NC not calculated, QC quality control, RE relative error (measure of accuracy), SD standard deviation

aIncludes data from one of four intra-day QC batches

bIncludes data from four inter-day QC batches

Table 4

Calibration accuracy results for HTBZ isomer standards in human plasmaa

Analyte	Standard
	Std1	Std2	Std3	Std4	Std5	Std6	Std7	Std8	Std9	Std10
Nominal concentration (ng/mL)	0.244	0.488	0.977	1.95	3.91	7.81	15.6	31.3	62.5	125
[+]-α-HTBZ
Mean	0.242	0.471	0.981	2.01	4.23	8.25	14.9	32.7	57.8	117
SD	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
CV, %	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
RE, %	−0.88	−3.5	0.40	2.9	8.2	5.5	−4.6	4.5	−7.6	−6.4
N	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
[−]-α-HTBZ
Mean	0.234	0.507	1.01	1.97	4.13	7.38	16.3	33.3	58.8	114
SD	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
CV, %	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
RE, %	−4.4	3.7	3.4	0.61	5.7	−5.5	4.0	6.4	−6.0	−9.2
N	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
[+]-β-HTBZ
Mean	0.230	0.513	0.952	2.02	3.28	7.84	17.6	32.5	59.4	123
SD	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
CV, %	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
RE, %	−5.8	5.0	−2.5	3.4	−16	0.35	12	3.8	−5.0	−1.6
N	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
[−]-β-HTBZ
Mean	0.218	0.512	1.06	1.95	4.26	7.36	15.9	31.0	60.3	114
SD	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
CV, %	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
RE, %	−11	4.9	8.5	−0.16	8.9	−5.9	1.8	−0.80	−3.5	−8.8
N	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2

CV coefficient of variation (measure of precision), HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, N number of replicates, NC not calculated, RE relative error (measure of accuracy), SD standard deviation

aIncludes data from two calibration batches

Table 5

Intra- and inter-day assay precision and accuracy results for quality control samples of HTBZ isomers in human plasma

Analyte	Nominal concentration (ng/mL)	Intra-day assaya					Inter-day assayb
		Mean	SD	CV, %	RE, %	N	Mean	SD	CV, %	RE, %	N
[+]-α-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.705	0.03	4.8	−6.0	3	0.666	0.05	7.4	−11	6
MQC	7.50	7.74	0.12	1.5	−3.2	3	7.17	0.65	9.0	−4.5	6
HQC	75.0	75.9	2.1	2.7	−1.2	3	71.3	5.5	7.7	−5.0	6
[−]-α-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.737	0.02	2.3	−1.8	3	0.68	0.07	10.7	−9.6	6
MQC	7.50	8.18	0.59	7.2	9.0	3	7.44	0.89	11.9	−0.8	6
HQC	75.0	74.4	1.7	2.3	−0.84	3	69.3	5.91	8.5	−7.6	6
[+]-β-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.755	0.07	9.0	0.71	3	0.749	0.08	11	−0.09	6
MQC	7.50	8.17	0.27	3.3	8.9	3	7.54	0.79	11	0.51	6
HQC	75.0	77.2	2.5	3.2	2.9	3	73.1	5.4	7.40	−2.6	6
[−]-β-HTBZ
LQC	0.750	0.670	0.02	2.3	−11	3	0.634	0.05	7.7	−16	6
MQC	7.50	7.77	0.03	0.39	−3.6	3	7.42	0.75	10	−1.1	6
HQC	75.0	75.4	3.4	4.5	−0.53	3	71.7	5.3	7.4	−4.4	6

CV coefficient of variation (measure of precision), HQC high QC concentration, HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, LQC low QC concentration, MQC medium QC concentration, N number of replicates, QC quality control, RE relative error (measure of accuracy), SD standard deviation

aIncludes data from one of two intra-day QC batches

bIncludes data from two inter-day QC batches

Results

Bioanalytical Method Validation Results

As shown in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5, all batches of serum and plasma for method validation and sample analysis met acceptance criteria. No matrix interferences were observed from endogenous matrix components as observed in the representative blank chromatograms shown in Fig. 2, panels A and E. Based on these results, the method was acceptable for quantification of HTBZ isomers in serum and plasma.

Fig. 2

Representative extracted ion chromatograms for a serum blank (a), a serum standard for HTBZ isomers at the sample batch LLOQ of 0.244 ng/mL (b), 125 ng/mL serum standard for HTBZ isomers (c), a representative sample from a patient administered TBZ (d), a representative plasma blank (e), a plasma standard for HTBZ isomers at the sample batch LLOQ of 0.488 ng/mL (f), a 125-ng/mL plasma standard for HTBZ isomers (g), and a pooled plasma sample from patients administered VBZ (h). Serum and plasma assays were performed on different chromatographic column lots that demonstrated differences in column efficiency. When using the more retentive column lot, initial mobile phase composition was adjusted from 24% B to 26% B. Hence, slight differences in retention times were observed. HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, LLOQ lower limit of quantification, TBZ tetrabenazine, VBZ valbenazine

Bioanalytical

Representative extracted ion chromatograms for a serum blank, a serum standard for HTBZ isomers at the sample batch LLOQ of 0.244 ng/mL, 125 ng/mL serum standard, and a serum sample from a patient administered TBZ are shown in Fig. 2 (panels A, B, C, and D, respectively). Representative extracted ion chromatograms for a plasma blank, a plasma standard for HTBZ isomers at the sample batch LLOQ of 0.488 ng/mL, 125 ng/mL plasma standard, and a pooled plasma sample from patients administered VBZ are shown in Fig. 2 (panels E, F, G, and H, respectively). Chromatographic separation of each of the four isomers is illustrated in the standards. All four isomers were quantifiable in the samples from patients administered TBZ, whereas only the [+]-α-HTBZ isomer was quantifiable in the samples from patients administered VBZ.

Circulating Concentrations of Dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) Isomers in Patients Taking Tetrabenazine (TBZ) and Valbenazine (VBZ)

Concentrations of the individual HTBZ isomers determined in serum samples collected from Huntington’s patients taking TBZ, and plasma samples collected from patients with tardive dyskinesia taking VBZ once daily are shown in Table 6 and depicted in Fig. 3.

Table 6

HTBZ isomer concentrations in serum or plasma following either tetrabenazine or valbenazine administration

Variable	Tetrabenazinea			Valbenazineb
	Subject 1	Subject 2	Subject 3	Pool A (40 mg)c	Pool B (80 mg)c
[+]-α-HTBZd
Mean ± SD	1.13 ± 0.015	2.08 ± 0.015	0.512 ± 0.078	20.1 ± 1.153	47.5 ± 0.379
Replicate 1	1.11	2.10	0.602	19.0	47.3
Replicate 2	1.13	2.08	0.472	21.3	47.9
Replicate 3	1.14	2.07	0.461	20.0	47.2
CV, %	1.4	0.7	15.3	5.7	0.8
[−]-α-HTBZd
Mean ± SD	27.7 ± 0.907	61.1 ± 3.460	22.0 ± 0.100
Replicate 1	28.5	59.9	21.9	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 2	27.8	65.0	22.0	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 3	26.7	58.4	22.1	BLQ	BLQ
CV, %	3.3	5.7	0.5
[+]-β-HTBZd
Mean ± SD	25.1 ± 0.173	33.4 ± 1.721	13.3 ± 0.700
Replicate 1	25.3	31.4	12.5	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 2	25.0	34.6	13.8	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 3	25.0	34.1	13.6	BLQ	BLQ
CV, %	0.7	5.2	5.3
[−]-β-HTBZd
Mean ± SD	3.00 ± 0.078	4.78 ± 0.214	2.32 ± 0.200
Replicate 1	3.02	5.02	2.51	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 2	2.91	4.69	2.11	BLQ	BLQ
Replicate 3	3.06	4.62	2.33	BLQ	BLQ
CV, %	2.6	4.5	8.6

BLQ below limit of quantification, CV coefficient of variation, HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, SD standard deviation

aTetrabenazine results are from serum samples expressed as ng/mL

bValbenazine results are from plasma sample pools expressed as ng/mL

cBLQ for valbenazine pools: [−]-α-HTBZ <0.244 ng/mL, [+]-β-HTBZ <0.488 ng/mL, [−]-β-HTBZ <0.488 ng/mL. Mean and CV not calculated for isomers with BLQ concentrations

dReplicates were assayed within the same analytical batch

Fig. 3

Concentrations of the individual HTBZ isomers determined in serum samples collected from patients with Huntington’s disease taking TBZ and in pooled plasma samples collected from patients with tardive dyskinesia taking VBZ once daily. HTBZ dihydrotetrabenazine, TBZ tetrabenazine, VBZ valbenazine

The most abundant HTBZ metabolites following TBZ administration were [−]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ. [−]-β-HTBZ was observed at relatively lower levels following TBZ administration and [+]-α-HTBZ accounted for only a very small fraction of overall metabolite exposure following TBZ administration. In contrast, the only quantifiable HTBZ isomer following VBZ administration was [+]-α-HTBZ. These results indicate that there is a markedly different steady-state exposure profile of HTBZ metabolites following administration of TBZ and VBZ.

Discussion

We here report the first demonstration of the simultaneous quantification of the circulating concentrations of the four individual HTBZ isomers in samples collected from patients taking TBZ. The total HTBZ isomer concentrations resulting from administration of TBZ were consistent with previously published steady-state data that presented combined concentrations of enantiomeric pairs of HTBZ isomers [16]. Although the exact dosing regimen of the patients with Huntington’s disease is unknown, they were receiving TBZ as a treatment for their disorder and the determined concentrations would be expected to be representative of repeat twice-daily administration of TBZ in that population. The analysis of three serum samples from patients receiving TBZ is sufficient to demonstrate utility of the assay methodology, but is not sufficient to define the effects of intrinsic or extrinsic variables on concentrations of the individual HTBZ isomers. Nonetheless, the pattern of [−]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ being the most abundant isomers was consistent among the patients, suggesting that the profile may be representative. For VBZ, the concentrations of [+]-α-HTBZ determined in the present study were consistent with those determined using non-chiral methodology, which would be expected as VBZ is administered as a single isomer itself, and thus forms a specific single HTBZ isomer. It is acknowledged that the sample pooling process used for the VBZ samples could have resulted in a dilution of other isomers present in any one individual sample. However, considering that the observed [+]-α-HTBZ concentration in the 80-mg pool (47.5 ng/mL) is approximately 100-fold higher than the LLOQ of other isomers (0.488 ng/mL), and given that VBZ is administered as a single isomer where hydrolysis can only generate the single observed isomer ([+]-α-HTBZ), these data support that only a single HTBZ isomer is generated following VBZ administration.

The large concentration differences observed for the individual HTBZ isomers are consistent with preliminary in vitro experiments performed in our lab that showed stereo-selective reduction of the TBZ enantiomers by microsomal and cytosolic carbonyl reductase, the metabolic process by which HTBZ isomers are formed (data not shown). However other important factors impacting exposures of the individual HTBZ isomers, such as clearance rates, have not yet been investigated. In vivo experiments using rat and mouse models and the same chiral LC-MS/MS methodology used in the present study also indicate that the stereo-selectivity in HTBZ isomer formation from TBZ is also species-dependent (manuscript in preparation).

As HTBZ isomers are highly permeable and readily cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in non-human species such as rats [16, 17], circulating concentrations of these metabolites provide a reasonable surrogate for concentrations in the brain (the proposed site of action). It is acknowledged that determination of full pharmacokinetic profiles of these isomers would provide a more complete understanding of the overall relative abundance and exposure/effect relationships of these metabolites and this remains a subject of interest. Nonetheless, these analyses provide the relative abundance of HTBZ isomers at the time of sampling following TBZ and VBZ administration.

Contribution of HTBZ Isomers to Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 (VMAT2) Inhibition by TBZ and VBZ

The in vitro VMAT2 inhibitory potencies of individual HTBZ isomers have been determined by several investigators [6, 7, 9]. These studies indicated that only two of the four HTBZ isomers ([+]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ) have appreciable VMAT2 inhibitory activity. Measured K i values for [+]-α-HTBZ ranged from 0.31 to 1.3 ng/mL (0.97–4.2 nM) while values for [+]-β-HTBZ ranged from 3.1 to 4.3 ng/mL (9.7–13.4 nM), demonstrating that both isomers were potent VMAT2 inhibitors with [+]-α-HTBZ being slightly (2- to 4-fold) more potent than [+]-β-isomer. K i values determined for the relatively inactive HTBZ isomers ranged from 80 ng/mL to 7.6 µg/mL (250–23,700 nM) for [−]-α-HTBZ and 220 to 786 ng/mL (690–2460 nM) for [−]-β-HTBZ. The difference in VMAT inhibitory potency of [+]-α-HTBZ and [−]-α-HTBZ (both α-isomers) is consistent with a PET imaging study in humans where [+]-α-HTBZ demonstrated dense localization and selective binding in brain regions with the highest expression of VMAT2 compared with [−]-α-HTBZ [18].

While there is wide (more than 20-fold) inter-individual variability, the ratio of α-HTBZ (combined [+]-α-HTBZ and [−]-α-HTBZ) to β-HTBZ (combined [+]-β-HTBZ and [−]-β-HTBZ) is approximately 3–1 in patients taking TBZ [19]. The generally higher exposures observed for α-HTBZ, the slightly higher potency of [+]-α-HTBZ relative to [+]-β-HTBZ, and the lack of individual HTBZ isomer concentration data have contributed to the common perception that α-HTBZ (in particular [+]-α-HTBZ) was the most important contributor to the overall in vivo inhibition of VMAT2 by TBZ. Results from the present study directly measuring the independent isomers call this supposition into question as measured concentrations of [+]-β-HTBZ were on average more than 20-fold higher than those observed for [+]-α-HTBZ following TBZ administration. Even when the slightly higher potency of [+]-α-HTBZ versus [+]-β-HTBZ is taken into consideration, the important contribution of [+]-β-HTBZ for VMAT2 inhibition following TBZ administration is clear. This primary role of [+]-β-HTBZ for VMAT2 inhibition following TBZ administration may help explain the need for a frequent (two to three times daily) dosing schedule for TBZ as the half-life of total β-HTBZ isomer is relatively short (5 h) [16]. In contrast to TBZ, the only HTBZ isomer formed by VBZ is [+]-α-HTBZ. These data strongly suggest that in vivo VMAT2 inhibition by TBZ and VBZ is in fact caused via different active metabolites.

Contribution of HTBZ Isomers to Potential Off-Target Effects

Binding of individual HTBZ isomers to CNS relevant targets other than VMAT2 has also been investigated [7]. While the HTBZ isomers that are potent inhibitors of VMAT2 ([+]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ) are highly selective, the other two isomers ([−]-α-HTBZ and [−]-β-HTBZ) show high-affinity binding to other CNS-relevant targets. Inhibitory constants for [−]-α-HTBZ were 58 and 23 ng/mL (180 and 71 nM) for the D2 and 5-HT7 receptors, respectively. Inhibitory constants for [−]-β-HTBZ were 17 and 1.9 ng/mL (53 and 5.9 nM) for the D2 and 5-HT7 receptors, respectively. Based on the circulating concentrations of these isomers observed in the samples from patients administered TBZ, pharmacological effects on these targets cannot be excluded.

Clinical Considerations

This study provides a practical method for the routine quantification of individual HTBZ isomers in serum or plasma. Determination of the exposure to the specific HTBZ isomers would be highly valuable in clinical practice to better understand the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic variables on the efficacy and safety profile of TBZ, including the potential for CNS adverse effects or QTc prolongation. Like many therapeutic agents, the individual patient risk-to-benefit ratio of TBZ may be altered by intrinsic and extrinsic variables. Intrinsic variables, such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, have already been demonstrated to impact clinical use of TBZ in that, due to potential for decreased clearance of HTBZ isomers, the maximum TBZ dose is restricted in patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM). However, without knowledge of the impact of CYP2D6 PM status on exposure to the individual isomers, the optimal TBZ doses to maintain an acceptable risk-to-benefit exposure cannot be determined. Similarly, extrinsic factors such as co-administration with concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors have been shown to differentially affect exposure to total α- (3-fold increase in overall exposure) and β-isomers (9-fold increase in overall exposure) of HTBZ [4]. However, since the magnitude of their effect on the individual isomers is unknown, the specific change in the risk-to-benefit ratio when co-administering TBZ with CYP2D6 inhibitors cannot be determined. Similar concerns apply to other intrinsic and extrinsic variables that are known to, or could potentially affect HTBZ exposure, including hepatic impairment, renal impairment, and age effects. Differential effects of CYP2D6 inhibitors on α- and β-isomers may also be of clinical relevance for deutetrabenazine, the deuterated analog of TBZ. Coadministration of paroxetine, a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor, caused a 1.9- and 6.5-fold increase in overall exposure to the total α- and total β-isomers of deutetrabenazine [20]. However, paroxetine effects on the individual α- and β-isomers of deutetrabenazine are unknown.

Conclusion

In summary, this study demonstrated that quantitation of individual HTBZ isomers in plasma or serum is feasible and that, based on the few current samples, exposure to [−]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ may predominate over exposure to [−]-β-HTBZ and [+]-α-HTBZ. It is important to note that the novel VMAT2 inhibitor, VBZ, produces only the [+]-α-HTBZ isomer, suggesting that the predominant VMAT2 inhibitory activity arises from different circulating metabolites when comparing TBZ with VBZ. Considering the different pharmacologic profiles of the individual HTBZ isomers formed from TBZ, and the potential for individual isomer exposure to be differentially impacted by intrinsic and extrinsic variables, quantitation of the individual isomers should be routine practice during conduct of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic studies of TBZ to enable an informed assessment of the risk-to-benefit profile of TBZ under differing clinical conditions.

This study presents the first reported method for quantifying the four different isomeric dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) metabolites of tetrabenazine, a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor, in serum or plasma samples.

For tetrabenazine, [−]-α-HTBZ and [+]-β-HTBZ were the most abundant HTBZ isomers in circulation; for valbenazine, the only observed isomer was [+]-α-HTBZ.

Quantitation of the individual isomers is essential to enable an informed assessment of the risk-to-benefit profile of TBZ under differing clinical conditions.