Geraldine J Ooi1,2,3, Paul R Burton4,5, Arul Earnest6, Cheryl Laurie4, William W Kemp7, Peter D Nottle5, Catriona A McLean8, Stuart K Roberts7, Wendy A Brown4,5. 1. Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. geraldine.ooi@monash.edu. 2. Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. geraldine.ooi@monash.edu. 3. Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Prahran, 3163, Australia. geraldine.ooi@monash.edu. 4. Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are endemic in obesity. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of a simple intraoperative visual liver score to stratify the risk of NASH and NAFLD in obesity and determine the need for liver biopsy. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of obese adults undergoing bariatric surgery. The surgical team used a visual liver score to evaluate liver colour, size and surface. This was compared to histology from an intraoperative liver biopsy. RESULTS: There were 152 participants, age 44.6 ± 12 years, BMI 45 ± 8.3 kg/m2. Prevalence of NAFLD was 70.4%, with 12.1% NASH and 26.4% borderline NASH. Single-visual components were less accurate than total composite score. Steatosis was most accurately identified (significant steatosis: AUROC 0.746, p < 0.05; severe steatosis: AUROC 0.855, p < 0.05). NASH was identified with moderate accuracy (AUROC 0.746, p = 0.001), with sensitivity 75% for a score ≥ 2. Stratification into low (≤ 1) and high-risk (≥ 4) scores accurately identified patients who should or should not have an intraoperative biopsy. Most patients with a normal-appearing liver did not have disease (94.4%). The structured visual assessment was quick and interobserver agreement was reasonable (κ = 0.53, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A simple, structured tool based on liver appearance can be a useful and reliable tool for NAFLD risk stratification and identification of patients who would most and least benefit from a biopsy. A normal liver appearance reliably excludes significant liver disease, avoiding the need for liver biopsy in patients otherwise at high clinical risk of NASH.
BACKGROUND:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are endemic in obesity. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of a simple intraoperative visual liver score to stratify the risk of NASH and NAFLD in obesity and determine the need for liver biopsy. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of obese adults undergoing bariatric surgery. The surgical team used a visual liver score to evaluate liver colour, size and surface. This was compared to histology from an intraoperative liver biopsy. RESULTS: There were 152 participants, age 44.6 ± 12 years, BMI 45 ± 8.3 kg/m2. Prevalence of NAFLD was 70.4%, with 12.1% NASH and 26.4% borderline NASH. Single-visual components were less accurate than total composite score. Steatosis was most accurately identified (significant steatosis: AUROC 0.746, p < 0.05; severe steatosis: AUROC 0.855, p < 0.05). NASH was identified with moderate accuracy (AUROC 0.746, p = 0.001), with sensitivity 75% for a score ≥ 2. Stratification into low (≤ 1) and high-risk (≥ 4) scores accurately identified patients who should or should not have an intraoperative biopsy. Most patients with a normal-appearing liver did not have disease (94.4%). The structured visual assessment was quick and interobserver agreement was reasonable (κ = 0.53, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A simple, structured tool based on liver appearance can be a useful and reliable tool for NAFLD risk stratification and identification of patients who would most and least benefit from a biopsy. A normal liver appearance reliably excludes significant liver disease, avoiding the need for liver biopsy in patients otherwise at high clinical risk of NASH.
Authors: Don C Rockey; Stephen H Caldwell; Zachary D Goodman; Rendon C Nelson; Alastair D Smith Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David E Kleiner; Paul D Berk; Jesse Y Hsu; Anita P Courcoulas; David Flum; Saurabh Khandelwal; John Pender; Alfons Pomp; James Roerig; Laura L Machado; Bruce M Wolfe; Steven H Belle Journal: Semin Liver Dis Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 6.115
Authors: Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Laura A Wilson; Patricia Belt; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Antônio Roberto Franchi Teixeira; Marta Bellodi-Privato; José Barreto Carvalheira; Victor Fernando Pilla; José Carlos Pareja; Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sherene Shalhub; Anna Parsee; Scott F Gallagher; Krista L Haines; Chris Willkomm; Stephen G Brantley; Haim Pinkas; Lisa Saff-Koche; Michel M Murr Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.129