Literature DB >> 28776047

An Interoperable Similarity-based Cohort Identification Method Using the OMOP Common Data Model version 5.0.

Shreya Chakrabarti1, Anando Sen1, Vojtech Huser2, Gregory W Hruby1, Alexander Rusanov3, David J Albers1, Chunhua Weng1.   

Abstract

Cohort identification for clinical studies tends to be laborious, time-consuming, and expensive. Developing automated or semi-automated methods for cohort identification is one of the "holy grails" in the field of biomedical informatics. We propose a high-throughput similarity-based cohort identification algorithm by applying numerical abstractions on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data. We implement this algorithm using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM), which enables sites using this standardized EHR data representation to avail this algorithm with minimum effort for local implementation. We validate its performance for a retrospective cohort identification task on six clinical trials conducted at the Columbia University Medical Center. Our algorithm achieves an average Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.966 and an average Precision at 5 of 0.983. This interoperable method promises to achieve efficient cohort identification in EHR databases. We discuss suitable applications of our method and its limitations and propose warranted future work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case-based Reasoning (CBR); Cohort Identification; Electronic Health Records (EHR); Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP); Phenotype; Similarity-based

Year:  2017        PMID: 28776047      PMCID: PMC5536903          DOI: 10.1007/s41666-017-0005-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res        ISSN: 2509-498X


  33 in total

1.  Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice.

Authors:  D J Friedman; B B Cohen; A R Averbach; J M Norton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology.

Authors:  Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Adding value to the electronic health record through secondary use of data for quality assurance, research, and surveillance.

Authors:  William R Hersh
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Similarity measure between patient traces for clinical pathway analysis: problem, method, and applications.

Authors:  Zhengxing Huang; Wei Dong; Huilong Duan; Haomin Li
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Naïve Electronic Health Record phenotype identification for Rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Robert J Carroll; Anne E Eyler; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 6.  Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials.

Authors:  Marc Cuggia; Paolo Besana; David Glasspool
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Electronic screening improves efficiency in clinical trial recruitment.

Authors:  Samir R Thadani; Chunhua Weng; J Thomas Bigger; John F Ennever; David Wajngurt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  William R Hersh; Mark G Weiner; Peter J Embi; Judith R Logan; Philip R O Payne; Elmer V Bernstam; Harold P Lehmann; George Hripcsak; Timothy H Hartzog; James J Cimino; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; David J Albers
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Evaluating predictive modeling algorithms to assess patient eligibility for clinical trials from routine data.

Authors:  Felix Köpcke; Dorota Lubgan; Rainer Fietkau; Axel Scholler; Carla Nau; Michael Stürzl; Roland Croner; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Dennis Toddenroth
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Extending the OMOP Common Data Model and Standardized Vocabularies to Support Observational Cancer Research.

Authors:  Rimma Belenkaya; Michael J Gurley; Asieh Golozar; Dmitry Dymshyts; Robert T Miller; Andrew E Williams; Shilpa Ratwani; Anastasios Siapos; Vladislav Korsik; Jeremy Warner; W Scott Campbell; Donna Rivera; Tatiana Banokina; Elizaveta Modina; Shantha Bethusamy; Henry Morgan Stewart; Meera Patel; Ruijun Chen; Thomas Falconer; Rae Woong Park; Seng Chan You; Hokyun Jeon; Soe Jeong Shin; Christian Reich
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.