Ariana Gray Bé1, Mary Alice Upshur1, Pengfei Liu2, Scot T Martin2,3, Franz M Geiger1, Regan J Thomson1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States. 2. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States. 3. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.
Abstract
The formation of atmospheric cloud droplets due to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles is important for quantifying the Earth's radiative balance under future, possibly warmer, climates, yet is only poorly understood. While cloud activation may be parametrized using the surface tension depression that coincides with surfactant partitioning to the gas-droplet interface, the extent to which cloud activation is influenced by both the chemical structure and reactivity of the individual molecules comprising this surfactant pool is largely unknown. We report herein considerable differences in the surface tension depression of aqueous pendant droplets that contain synthetically prepared ozonolysis products derived from α-pinene and β-caryophyllene, the most abundant of the monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, respectively, that are emitted over the planet's vast forest ecosystems. Oxidation products derived from β-caryophyllene were found to exhibit significantly higher surface activity than those prepared from α-pinene, with the critical supersaturation required for cloud droplet activation reduced by 50% for β-caryophyllene aldehyde at 1 mM. These considerable reductions in the critical supersaturation were found to coincide with free energies of adsorption that exceed ∼25 kJ/mol, or just one hydrogen bond equivalent, depending on the ammonium sulfate and oxidation product concentration in the solution. Additional experiments showed that aldehyde-containing oxidation products exist in equilibrium with hydrated forms in aqueous solution, which may modulate their bulk solubility and surface activity. Equilibration time scales on the order of 10-5 to 10-4 s calculated for micrometer-sized aerosol particles indicate instantaneous surface tension depression in the activation processes leading to cloud formation in the atmosphere. Our findings highlight the underlying importance of molecular structure and reactivity when considering cloud condensation activity in the presence of SOA particles.
The formation of atmospheric cloud droplets due to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles is important for quantifying the Earth's radiative balance under future, possibly warmer, climates, yet is only poorly understood. While cloud activation may be parametrized using the surface tension depression that coincides with surfactant partitioning to the gas-droplet interface, the extent to which cloud activation is influenced by both the chemical structure and reactivity of the individual molecules comprising this surfactant pool is largely unknown. We report herein considerable differences in the surface tension depression of aqueous pendant droplets that contain synthetically prepared ozonolysis products derived from α-pinene and β-caryophyllene, the most abundant of the monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, respectively, that are emitted over the planet's vast forest ecosystems. Oxidation products derived from β-caryophyllene were found to exhibit significantly higher surface activity than those prepared from α-pinene, with the critical supersaturation required for cloud droplet activation reduced by 50% for β-caryophyllene aldehyde at 1 mM. These considerable reductions in the critical supersaturation were found to coincide with free energies of adsorption that exceed ∼25 kJ/mol, or just one hydrogen bond equivalent, depending on the ammonium sulfate and oxidation product concentration in the solution. Additional experiments showed that aldehyde-containing oxidation products exist in equilibrium with hydrated forms in aqueous solution, which may modulate their bulk solubility and surface activity. Equilibration time scales on the order of 10-5 to 10-4 s calculated for micrometer-sized aerosol particles indicate instantaneous surface tension depression in the activation processes leading to cloud formation in the atmosphere. Our findings highlight the underlying importance of molecular structure and reactivity when considering cloud condensation activity in the presence of SOA particles.
Despite the abundance
of biogenic terpene-derived secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) particles in the lower troposphere[1] and their potential cooling effects for vast forested regions
of the globe,[2−6] the mechanisms that lead to their growth and that drive climate-relevant
cloud interactions of SOA material[4,7−10] remain elusive. A current area of intense research regarding the
properties of SOA particles focuses on the role of surface-active
organic compounds. Indeed, we have proposed that because the SOA gas–particle
interface is first to encounter gas–phase species, surface-localized
molecules may significantly influence SOA particle growth as well
as their propensity to serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN).[11] While many studies report the presence of numerous
different organic compounds within SOA particles,[4,12,13] only a subset of these compounds are expected
to be sufficiently surface active to reside at the aqueous particle
surface. This subset, which may be composed of surface-active species
having amphiphilic or surfactant-like behavior[14−16] and may thus
be termed an “organic surfactant pool”, has been hypothesized
to influence surface processes that ultimately lead to cloud activation
by lowering the surface tension of cloud-forming droplets containing
aerosol nuclei.Overall changes in the surface tension caused
by surface-active
molecules may alter the critical supersaturation required for cloud
droplet activation, thereby influencing the propensity of SOA particles
to nucleate cloud droplets.[14,17−21] A recent publication by Ruehl and co-workers suggests that the bulk–surface
partitioning of surface-active organic compounds can result in a concentrated
organic film near the gas–particle interface. This organic
film can significantly reduce the surface tension and result in a
larger droplet diameter before activation.[22] While current models have taken into account the contribution of
organic species to cloud activity through the bulk solubility effect,[23] surface tension depression effects have largely
been neglected, in part because of a lack of reliable direct dynamic
surface tension measurements of relevant individual surface-active
organic compounds.[11,14,22,24]Within this context, we decided to
investigate the ozonolysis oxidation
products derived from α-pinene and β-caryophyllene, which
we hypothesized might exhibit higher surface activity than previously
investigated isoprene derivatives[11] due
to their more surfactant-like structures. α-Pinene is the most
abundant monoterpene (i.e., C10) (∼50 Tg C y–1)[25,26] in the troposphere and is primarily
emitted over the boreal forest ecosystems of the northern hemisphere—the
largest terrestrial biome on Earth.[27,28] Sesquiterpenes
(i.e., C15), of which β-caryophyllene is the most
abundant[29−45] (ca. 5–7 Tg y–1),[46,47] are believed to be present in lower quantities in the atmosphere
(∼15 Tg C y–1 for sesquiterpene emissions).[34,47,26,48] Yet, sesquiterpenes exhibit higher reactivity toward ozone when
compared to monoterpenes,[31,34,44,49−51] which may lead
to an underestimation of emissions detected for these precursors and
therefore their resulting SOA material. Sesquiterpenes also have been
shown to afford higher comparative aerosol yields than isoprene and
abundant monoterpenes, and consequently may contribute significantly
to SOA particle formation.[29,42,52,53]Motivated by field and
laboratory studies reporting various proposed
oxidation products derived from α-pinene and β-caryophyllene,[12,44,50,54,55] and given the potentially significant role
that these organic species might play in various atmospheric processes,
including SOA formation,[10,13,56−58] we study here a series of structurally related monomeric
ozonolysis products derived from β-caryophyllene and α-pinene
(Figure ). The specific
compounds synthesized have been proposed as constituents relevant
to SOA material in field and laboratory aerosol studies[29−45,59−61] and may therefore
serve as homogeneous standards to further corroborate those studies.
Moreover, we present dynamic surface tension measurements of this
series of compounds and provide estimations of their individual supersaturation
ratios, which allow for prediction of CCN activity.
Figure 1
Atmospheric oxidation
products derived from α-pinene and
β-caryophyllene synthesized and measured in this study.
Atmospheric oxidation
products derived from α-pinene and
β-caryophyllene synthesized and measured in this study.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of α-Pinene
and β-Caryophyllene Oxidation
Products
Experimental procedures for the preparation of all
synthesized compounds studied are described in the Supporting Information. β-Caryophyllene aldehyde (4) and β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5) were
synthesized in an similar fashion to procedures reported by Parshintsev
and co-workers.[33] Additionally, β-caryophyllonic
acid (6) and β-nocaryophyllonic acid (7) were prepared analogously to procedures reported by van Eijck and
co-workers.[36] Attempts to synthesize β-caryophyllinic
acid (8) according to procedures published by the same
group were unsuccessful, however. We developed an alternative approach
for preparing compounds 8 and 9 that is
described in the Supporting Information. cis-Pinonic acid (98%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and used as received. With the exception of β-caryophyllinic
acid (8) and β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9), all synthesized compounds required iterative purification using
silica gel chromatagraphy until determined to be ≥95% pure
by the 1H NMR spectroscopy prior to performing surface
tension measurements. Compound-specific purification procedures are
included in the Supporting Information.
Pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic acid (2), and
pinic acid (3) are present as a low viscosity oil, powdery
solid, and highly viscous oil, respectively. All synthetic β-caryophyllene
oxidation products were isolated as highly viscous oils, with the
exception of β-nocaryophyllinic acid, which was isolated as
a powdery solid (Figure S1).In aqueous
environments, aldehydes may readily react with water and thus exist
in equilibrium with the hydrate or geminal diol form (Figure ). In order to monitor the
potential formation of the hydrate in aqueous solutions of pinonaldehyde
(1), β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4),
and β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), solutions (2
mg mL–1) of each compound in D2O were
prepared and monitored by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy
for 72 h. The presence of the hydrate in D2O was observed
for all three aldehyde oxidation products by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data collected after only 10 min (Figure A; hydrates 10, 11, and 12 were formed from
aldehydes 1, 4, and 5, respectively).
Hydrate formation resulted in a mixture containing approximately 55%
hydrate and 45% aldehyde for both pinonaldehyde (1) and
β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5) in D2O (Figure B). The
ratio of aldehyde-to-hydrate did not change any further over the course
of days, revealing that an aldehyde–hydrate equilibrium is
rapidly reached before 10 min for these compounds. In addition, the
ratio of aldehyde-to-hydrate did not change with the addition of ammonium
sulfate (100 mM in D2O) over 72 h. Note that the solubility
of β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4) in D2O was insufficient for accurate quantification of an aldehyde–hydrate
ratio, and therefore hydrate formation from this compound was only
qualitatively observed.
Figure 2
(A) In aqueous solution, aldehydes 1, 4, and 5 exist in equilibrium with their
hydrate forms 10, 11, and 12, respectively. (B) 1H NMR spectroscopic data taken in
D2O reveals an
aldehyde–hydrate mixture containing approximately 55% of the
hydrate form for both pinonaldehyde (1, 10) and β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5, 12). The shown spectra are for pinonaldehyde (1, 10). Note that the sparing solubility of β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) in D2O resulted in poor signal-to-noise
in the NMR spectra, and hydrate formation (i.e., 11)
from this compound was only qualitatively observed.
(A) In aqueous solution, aldehydes 1, 4, and 5 exist in equilibrium with their
hydrate forms 10, 11, and 12, respectively. (B) 1H NMR spectroscopic data taken in
D2O reveals an
aldehyde–hydrate mixture containing approximately 55% of the
hydrate form for both pinonaldehyde (1, 10) and β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5, 12). The shown spectra are for pinonaldehyde (1, 10). Note that the sparing solubility of β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) in D2O resulted in poor signal-to-noise
in the NMR spectra, and hydrate formation (i.e., 11)
from this compound was only qualitatively observed.
Dynamic Interfacial Tension Measurements
The surface
tension of suspended droplets was measured using pendant drop tensiometry
(PDT) over the course of 10 min for solutions of varying concentrations
(0–30 mM) in either deionized H2O or 1.0 M ammonium
sulfate solution. Similar equilibration times have been reported for
dynamic surface tension studies of PM10 size fraction of aerosol particles
collected in an urban setting.[24] Concentrations
of α-pinene-derived compounds in water solutions ranged from
0 to 30 mM for pinonic acid (2) and pinic acid (3) and from 0 to 10 mM for pinonaldehyde (1)
due to insolubility above 10 mM. All β-caryophyllene oxidation
products (i.e., compounds 4–9) were
insoluble above 1 mM, and therefore 0–1 mM concentrations were
measured for these compounds. Solutions in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate
were prepared using the same solute concentrations as those measured
in water. Concentrations that could not be measured due to compound
insolubility in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate are noted where applicable.
With the exception of pinonic acid,[16,21,62] we report unprecedented dynamic surface tension experiments
for the presented series of compounds.In Figure , the interfacial tension (σ) is plotted
as a function of solute concentration on a logarithmic scale for suspended
drops of solutions containing the synthesized four-membered ring oxidation
products derived from α-pinene and β-caryophyllene in
deionized water and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate, and the data are fitted
to the Szyszkowski–Langmuir equation.[14,63−65] Below we present the observations of droplets formed
using water and ammonium sulfate for the α-pinene oxidation
products, and then discuss our findings for the β-caryophyllene
oxidation products.
Figure 3
Comparison of interfacial tension (σ) as a function
of solute
concentration and Szyszkowski–Langmuir fitted curves for α-pinene-
and β-caryophyllene-derived oxidation products in water (A)
and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (B): pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic
acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic
acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9). All error
values range from 0.06 to 0.69 mN m–1.
Comparison of interfacial tension (σ) as a function
of solute
concentration and Szyszkowski–Langmuir fitted curves for α-pinene-
and β-caryophyllene-derived oxidation products in water (A)
and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (B): pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic
acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic
acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9). All error
values range from 0.06 to 0.69 mN m–1.The surface tension measurements for the α-pinene-derived
oxidation products in water reveal that pinonaldehyde (1) is the most surface active of the three compounds measured, reaching
a 20% decrease relative to the interfacial tension of water at the
highest measured concentration (10 mM) after 10 min (Figure S3). The surface tension depression caused by pinonaldehyde
(1) at 10 mM in water is comparable to that exhibited
by pinonic acid (2) and pinic acid (3) present
at three times that concentration in water (Figure A). The substantially higher surface tension
depression of pinonaldehyde (1) relative to pinonic acid
(2) and pinic acid (3) highlights a considerable
dependence of surface activity on structural functionality, as pinonic
acid (2) and pinic acid (3) bear highly
polar carboxylic acid moieties while pinonaldehyde (1) exists as an aldehyde–hydrate mixture with 10 in the aqueous droplets measured (Figure ).As reported previously, the surface
tension of the droplets is
raised by approximately 3% upon addition of 1.0 M ammonium sulfate
in water.[11] The results obtained for the
α-pinene-derived oxidation products in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate
(Figure B) show that
pinonaldehyde (1) and pinonic acid (2) exhibit
enhanced surface activity likely caused by a “salting out”
effect in the presence of ammonium sulfate, which increases the solute
concentration at the droplet surface due to decreased solubility with
the addition of inorganic salt.[11] The influence
of “salting out” effects on surface activity of organic
species may have a significant influence on the overall surface tension
of atmospheric aerosols, as a substantial portion of the aerosol bulk
contains inorganic salts such as (NH4)2SO4.[66−68] For example, 1 mM solutions of pinonaldehyde (1) and pinonic acid (2) in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate
each resulted in respective surface tension decreases of 8% and 6%
compared to 5% and 2%, respectively, at the same concentration in
water after 10 min, while a slight decrease in the surface activity
of pinic acid (3) was observed at 1 mM in 1.0 M ammonium
sulfate compared to in water (Figure S3). Slight enhancement of the surface tension lowering effects was
only observed at the higher concentrations measured for pinic acid
(3) in the presence of 1.0 M ammonium sulfate.Turning to the β-caryophyllene oxidation products, we reemphasize
that surface tension was measured between 0.01 mM and 1 mM due to
their low solubility in water at concentrations above 1 mM (Figure A). Of the six β-caryophyllene
oxidation products, β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4) was found to exhibit the highest surface activity in water solutions
at all concentrations measured, resulting in an overall 37% decrease
at 1 mM compared to the interfacial tension of water (Figure S4), the greatest surface tension depression
we have observed for all oxidation products we have studied to date.[11] Unexpectedly, β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde
(5) exhibited the least surface activity of all six derivatives.
This result for nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5) is potentially
attributed to an interdependent decrease in surface activity and increase
in solubility, which may be modulated by the existence of a hydrate–aldehyde
mixture containing 55% of the hydrate (i.e., 12) in water
rather than pure aldehyde content (Figure ). The hydrate form of β-nocaryophyllone
aldehyde is likely to increase its propensity to hydrogen bond with
solvent water molecules within the bulk of the droplet, causing lower
surface activity than anticipated. In contrast, β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) is substantially more hydrophobic than β-nocaryophyllone
aldehyde (5), due to the presence of an intact C=C
double bond adjacent to the four-membered ring rather than a ketone,
and therefore the hydrate form of β-caryophyllene aldehyde (i.e., 11) is unlikely to enhance its bulk aqueous solubility to
the same extent. Of the β-caryophyllene oxidation products containing
carboxylic acid functional groups, the most polar of the four compounds,
β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9), is the least surface
active, likely due to its higher solubility in water.In the
presence of 1.0 M ammonium sulfate, all six β-caryophyllene
oxidation products exhibited “salting out” effects (Figures B and S5), which were most pronounced for the oxidation
products that retain the exocyclic C=C double bond of β-caryophyllene
compared to those bearing a ketone at that same position. For example,
the two monoacid β-caryophyllene oxidation products, β-caryophyllonic
acid (6) and β-nocaryophyllonic acid (7), exhibited comparable surface activity at 1 mM in water; however,
upon addition of 1.0 M ammonium sulfate, “salting out”
effects were much more pronounced for β-caryophyllonic acid
(6) than for β-nocaryophyllonic acid (7).Comparing the surface activity of all compounds studied
at 1 mM
concentration, Figure highlights that the β-caryophyllene oxidation products are
significantly more surface active than the measured α-pinene-derived
oxidation products. The stark difference emphasizes that the surface
depression behavior exhibited by the monoterpene (C10)
and sesquiterpene (C15) ozone-mediated oxidation products
studied here depends on carbon chain length and degree of oxidation.
Yet, even the two least surface active compounds studied here, pinonic
acid (2) and pinic acid (3), still exhibit
larger surface tension depression than α-IEPOX, the most surface
active of the IEPOX and tetraol oxidation products derived from isoprene.[11]
Figure 4
Dynamic surface tension measurements comparing 1 mM solutions
in
water (A) and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (B)
for all compounds in this study: pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic
acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic
acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9). β-Caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) and β-caryophyllonic acid (6) were insoluble at 1 mM in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate and therefore
are not shown.
Dynamic surface tension measurements comparing 1 mM solutions
in
water (A) and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (B)
for all compounds in this study: pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic
acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene
aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic
acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic acid (9). β-Caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) and β-caryophyllonic acid (6) were insoluble at 1 mM in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate and therefore
are not shown.
Kinetics of Interfacial
Tension and Equilibration Time Scales
The values of dynamic
surface tension σ(t) are time dependent. Curves
of σ(t) presented
in Figure can be
typically divided into three kinetic regions: (I) rapid fall region
where σ rapidly decreases from the value of pure water (72.8
mN m–1) to σ0 within the initial
time step of the measurement; (II) meso-equilibrium region, in which
σ(t) slowly decreases with a characteristic
time scale of tm; and (III) equilibrium
region where the minimum value σm is reached. This
time-dependent curve can be described by the following equation:[24,69]where σ0, σm, tm, and n are
fitting
parameters. The optimized values of these parameters are listed in Table S1 for the obtained σ(t) data set.For most of the compounds studied, a significant
depression in surface tension was achieved in the rapid fall region,
as indicated by the lower values of σ0 than that
of pure water (Table S1). This surface
tension depression can be treated as instantaneous in any aerosol
and cloud process in the atmosphere. Further decrease of σ(t) occurred in the meso-equilibrium region, with a characteristic
time tm of equilibration that ranged from
10 to 1000 s (Table S1). At tm, σ(tm) = (σ0+ σm)/2, meaning that equilibration
was not yet reached. The final equilibration time was about twice
of tm (teq = 2tm).[24] Note that these time scales were measured for aqueous pendant droplets
with diameters of 1.9–2.1 mm in the PDT laboratory experiments.
These droplets were therefore much larger than typically sized aerosol
and cloud droplets in the atmosphere. To estimate the surface tension
effect for cloud activation, we calculated the equilibration time
scale for a 1 μm droplet using the following equation:where Ddrop represents
the average diameter of droplets used in the laboratory experiments
(Table S1). The droplet diameter of 1 μm
is a typical size of activated aerosol particles. As reference, a
particle with a 200 nm dry diameter has an activation diameter of
1.07 μm, assuming a hygroscopic parameter κ of 0.1 and
a surface tension equal to that of pure water. The calculated equilibration
time scales for 1 μm droplets were on the order of 10–5 to 10–4 s (Table S1). These results indicate that the surface tension depression observed
in the laboratory experiments can occur instantaneously in the cloud
activation processes both in online instruments and in the atmosphere,
given that the surfactant concentrations are similar to those measured
in the laboratory.Nozière and co-workers suggested that
the equilibration
time scale can steeply increase with a decreasing surfactant concentration.[24] Ambient particles having a low concentration
of strong surfactant might exhibit delayed equilibrium. In the present
study, we do not intend to extrapolate the results to a lower concentration
because this extrapolation may have a large uncertainty.
Calculation
of Cloud Activation Potential
Cloud droplet
formation via water vapor condensation onto SOA particles is known
to be heavily influenced by concentration-dependent surface tension
depression effects caused by surface active species, which can reduce
the critical supersaturation at the moment of cloud droplet activation.[14] As described in our previous study[11] and by the McNeill laboratory,[14,66] the critical supersaturation ratio (sc*/sc) for cloud activation can be determined using Köhler
theory[14,70] from the equilibrium surface tension of
a given solute concentration in water (σ) and
the surface tension of water (σw) (72.8 mN m–1),[71] and
is expressed as follows:Equation assumes that the effect of surface-active
organic species
on equilibrium CCN activity is based purely on surface tension if
the bulk solute concentration remains constant.[66] We note, however, that the critical supersaturation ratio
calculated by eq neglects
the effect of surfactant partitioning on the Raoult effect,[72,73] which may potentially increase the critical supersaturation ratio
for small particles by reducing the bulk solute concentration and
therefore partially counteract the effect of surface tension depression.
However, as noted by Sareen and co-workers previously, under heterogeneous
SOA formation conditions the bulk solute composition of the particle
is expected to be dominated by salt, and this solute content is expected
to remain constant if gas-phase species are continuously taken up
at the aerosol surface as they partition to the particle phase.[66] Therefore, we make the assumption that the effect
of organic species on equilibrium CCN activity is purely surface tension
based in the present study. From the equilibrium surface tension (calculated
as the average of the final 20 values of 3–5 10 min acquisitions)
(Tables S2 and S3), sc*/sc was calculated at all concentrations measured for each
compound in both water and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (Tables and 2). The equilibrium results were reported herein because such equilibrium
can be reached instantaneously in a typically sized particle at activation
point (see above). The concentrations of 0.01 to 30 mM are relevant
to the total surfactant concentrations in ambient conditions.[74] As an estimate, a particle composed of 20% to
100% mass fraction of secondary organic material has a total organic
concentration of 1–10 M at dry condition. The hygroscopic growth
of a particle from dry to cloud activation corresponds to a volume
dilution factor of 20 to 1000. The activated particle thus has a total
organic concentration of 1 to 500 mM, and the concentration of an
individual compound can be much lower. Even so, the studied individual
compounds can serve as representatives of a broad spectrum of monomeric
carboxylic acids and aldehydes produced from the ozonolysis of α-pinene
and β-caryophyllene precursors, and the total concentrations
can be sufficiently high, thus having a significant effect on cloud
activation. Similar calculations indicate that a typically sized ammonium
sulfate particle (30–500 nm dry diameter) has an ammonium sulfate
concentration of 1 to 100 mM. The effect of adding 1.0 M ammonium
sulfate observed in the present study can thus serve as an upper limit
estimate for the presence of salts in organic particles.
Table 1
Supersaturation Ratios (sc*/sc) for
α-Pinene-Derived Oxidation Products
at 0–30 mM in Water and 1.0 M Ammonium Sulfate (Values in Parentheses)a
Asterisk (*)
notes that value
was not obtained due to insolubility at the indicated concentration.
Note: Pinonaldehyde (1) exists in equilibrium with its
hydrate form as described in the text.
Table 2
Supersaturation Ratios (sc*/sc) for β-Caryophyllene-Derived Oxidation
Products at 0–1 mM in Water and 1.0 M Ammonium Sulfate (Values
in Parentheses)a
Asterisk (*)
notes that value
was not obtained due to insolubility at the indicated concentration.
Note: Aldehyde containing compounds 4 and 5 exist in equilibrium with hydrate forms as described in the text.
Asterisk (*)
notes that value
was not obtained due to insolubility at the indicated concentration.
Note: Pinonaldehyde (1) exists in equilibrium with its
hydrate form as described in the text.Asterisk (*)
notes that value
was not obtained due to insolubility at the indicated concentration.
Note: Aldehyde containing compounds 4 and 5 exist in equilibrium with hydrate forms as described in the text.We previously reported an sc*/sc of 0.90 (10% decrease) for 10 mM trans-β-IEPOX
in water.[11] As shown in Table , a comparable sc*/sc value of 0.93 was calculated for pinonaldehyde
(1) in water at 1 mM. Additionally, Table shows a similar sc*/sc value of 0.92 for β-caryophyllene aldehyde
(4) at a concentration of 0.01 mM in water, which is
1000 times lower than the concentration producing a comparable supersaturation
ratio (10 mM) for trans-β-IEPOX in water.[11] Of all the oxidation products we have studied
to date, β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4) was shown
to decrease sc*/sc by the largest
extent (50% in water), highlighting the highly amphiphilic and surfactant-like
nature of this compound as well as the other monomeric sesquiterpene
oxidation products studied relative to monomeric oxidation products
derived from α-pinene and isoprene.
Atmospheric Implications
According to the 2013 Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change Report,[6] atmospheric
aerosol–cloud interactions remain among the least understood
of processes within the climate system. Investigation of sesquiterpenes
in the context of SOA–cloud interactions has been particularly
rare, in part due to experimental shortcomings related to measuring
SOA cloud activation properties coupled with the characteristic complexity
and sparse level of chemical understanding regarding sesquiterpenes
and their oxidation products compared to other SOA precursors. Comparison
of CCN activity of sesquiterpene- and monoterpene-derived SOA samples
using cloud condensation nuclei counters (CCNC) has demonstrated that
CCN activity of SOA from β-caryophyllene and other sesquiterpenes
is lower than that of monoterpene SOA as quantified by CCNC detection.[71,75,76] However, CCN activity of β-caryophyllene
SOA, for example, was reported to be greater when measured using a
static diffusion (SD) CCNC than when measured with a continuous flow
(CF) CCNC, highlighting a possibility for measurement variability
by CCNC detection.[52,75] Additionally, β-caryophyllene
contributions to secondary organic CCN were revisited by Asa-Awuku
and co-workers in 2012,[77] who measured
higher CCN activity and hygroscopicity than reported previously and
concluded that β-caryophyllene-derived SOA formed in the presence
of ozone may be a potentially important source of biogenic CCN.[75−77] CCN activity experiments performed using cloud condensation nucleus
counters (CCNC) and related hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility
analyzers (HTDMA) indirectly quantify CCN activity by measuring population
or growth of nucleated droplets rather than Raoult’s term and
surface tension, which are key parameters related to cloud activation
outlined by Köhler theory.[14,24,70] Additionally, HTDMA and CCNC instruments typically
collect measurements in a time regime on the order of seconds to minutes.
In their 2014 publication, Nozière and co-workers suggested
that bulk-to-surface partitioning of low-concentration surface-active
organic compounds may reach equilibrium beyond time scales detectable
by these instruments.[24] The experimental
results and calculations in the present study, however, suggest that
such a delayed equilibrium might be less important for abundant oxidation
products at conditions relevant to cloud activation. Nevertheless,
Nozière and co-workers highlighted the importance of using
bulk surface tension studies of SOA samples as an alternative approach
to CCNC and HTDMA experiments to gain a more comprehensive understanding
of the role of surface active organics in SOA particle CCN activity.[24] Our findings improve upon the growing insight
obtained from surface tension studies related to atmospheric aerosol
by providing molecule-specific insight into the aqueous surface tension
depression induced by pure standards of oxidation products relevant
to terpene-derived SOA material.Oxidation of α-pinene
and β-caryophyllene in the atmosphere generates a plethora of
products of different molecular weight and containing diverse sets
of functional groups that impact their surface activities. In order
to deconvolute the complexity associated with analyzing this mixture,
we focused on several abundant monomeric acid- and aldehyde-containing
ozonolysis products. As shown in Figure , molecular properties such as the surface
area per molecule adsorbed at the air/water interface of the pendant
drop correlate seemingly well with the free energy of adsorption (both
parameters were obtained from the Szyszkowski–Langmuir equation
as outlined in the Supporting Information), at least for the β-caryophyllene oxidation product series
examined here. Moreover, our analysis indicates that, for the β-caryophyllene
oxidation products, free energies of adsorption larger than ∼25
kJ/mol (just one hydrogen bond equivalent) coincide with considerable
reductions in supersaturation ratios, depending on ammonium sulfate
and oxidation product concentration in solution.
Figure 5
(A) Area per molecule
adsorbed at the air/water interface of pendant
drops as a function of the free energy of adsorption obtained from
the Szyszkowski–Langmuir equation. Results are for solutions
in water (empty symbols) and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (filled symbols)
for the α-pinene (squares) and the β-caryophyllene (circles)
series: Pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic
acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic
acid (9). (B) Supersaturation ratio as a function of
free energy of adsorption of the β-caryophyllene series studied
here. Results are for solutions in water (empty symbols) and 1.0 M
ammonium sulfate (filled symbols) for concentrations of 0.01 (circles),
0.1 (triangles), and 0.2 (squares) mmol/L. β-Caryophyllene aldehyde
(4) and β-caryophyllonic acid (6)
were insoluble at 1 mM in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate and therefore are
not shown.
(A) Area per molecule
adsorbed at the air/water interface of pendant
drops as a function of the free energy of adsorption obtained from
the Szyszkowski–Langmuir equation. Results are for solutions
in water (empty symbols) and 1.0 M ammonium sulfate (filled symbols)
for the α-pinene (squares) and the β-caryophyllene (circles)
series: Pinonaldehyde (1), pinonic acid (2), pinic acid (3), β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4), β-nocaryophyllone aldehyde (5), β-caryophyllonic
acid (6), β-nocaryophyllonic acid (7), β-caryophyllinic acid (8), and β-nocaryophyllinic
acid (9). (B) Supersaturation ratio as a function of
free energy of adsorption of the β-caryophyllene series studied
here. Results are for solutions in water (empty symbols) and 1.0 M
ammonium sulfate (filled symbols) for concentrations of 0.01 (circles),
0.1 (triangles), and 0.2 (squares) mmol/L. β-Caryophyllene aldehyde
(4) and β-caryophyllonic acid (6)
were insoluble at 1 mM in 1.0 M ammonium sulfate and therefore are
not shown.We expect that molecular-level
measurements such as the ones presented
here will be useful for developing structure–function relationships
across atmospheric organic species and serve as benchmarks for future
studies that could involve recently developed complementary surface
tension measurements in more atmospherically transferable droplet-size
regimes[78,79] as well as other surface-specific climate-relevant
aerosol techniques.[80−82]Ultimately, given the inherent complexity of
studying the surface
tension of SOA-related systems in the context of cloud droplet condensation,
we take the specific approach of cataloging the relative surface tension
depression exhibited by individual α-pinene and β-caryophyllene
oxidation products in order to gain chemical insight into the correlation
between surface activity and molecular structure and reactivity. Among
the series of compounds studied, β-caryophyllene aldehyde (4) shows significant cloud activation potentials, indicating
that it might play a substantial role in the atmosphere. Our investigations
also reveal that aqueous solutions of terpene oxidation products containing
aldehyde functional groups exist in equilibrium with hydrated forms,
which may modulate their bulk solubility and surface activity. Overall,
our findings highlight substantial differences in surface tension
to consider for this given series of monomeric terpene-derived ozonolysis
products, and the data obtained in this study should prove valuable
for chemical comparison to laboratory and field CCN studies.
Conclusions
In summary, we present dynamic surface tension measurements of
synthetically prepared homogeneous oxidation products derived from
α-pinene and β-caryophyllene and provide calculated equilibration
time scales and supersaturation ratios of relevance to predicting
CCN activity. Equilibration time scales calculated for a 1 μm
aerosol particle provide an estimate of the surface tension depression
effect on cloud activation for typically sized atmospheric particles.
The results of these experiments also demonstrate that the oxidation
products derived from β-caryophyllene exhibit significantly
greater surface tension depression behavior, and, consequently, cloud
activation potentials, than those prepared from α-pinene. β-Caryophyllene
aldehyde (4) was found to be the most surface active
of all compounds we have studied to date, with a calculated supersaturation
ratio of 50% at 1 mM concentration, and 8% at 10 μM concentration.
We also revealed that hydrate formation from oxidation products containing
aldehydes was rapid, leading to approximately equal mixtures of the
aldehyde and hydrate forms within aqueous solutions of the compounds
investigated. Our findings provide specific molecular-level understanding
of the relative surface tension effects exhibited by α-pinene
and β-caryophyllene oxidation products toward investigating
their role as surface-active organic compounds in SOA–cloud
interactions.
Authors: Xuan Zhang; Renee C McVay; Dan D Huang; Nathan F Dalleska; Bernard Aumont; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Barbara Nozière; Markus Kalberer; Magda Claeys; James Allan; Barbara D'Anna; Stefano Decesari; Emanuela Finessi; Marianne Glasius; Irena Grgić; Jacqueline F Hamilton; Thorsten Hoffmann; Yoshiteru Iinuma; Mohammed Jaoui; Ariane Kahnt; Christopher J Kampf; Ivan Kourtchev; Willy Maenhaut; Nicholas Marsden; Sanna Saarikoski; Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis; Jason D Surratt; Sönke Szidat; Rafal Szmigielski; Armin Wisthaler Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Mikael Ehn; Joel A Thornton; Einhard Kleist; Mikko Sipilä; Heikki Junninen; Iida Pullinen; Monika Springer; Florian Rubach; Ralf Tillmann; Ben Lee; Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker; Stefanie Andres; Ismail-Hakki Acir; Matti Rissanen; Tuija Jokinen; Siegfried Schobesberger; Juha Kangasluoma; Jenni Kontkanen; Tuomo Nieminen; Theo Kurtén; Lasse B Nielsen; Solvejg Jørgensen; Henrik G Kjaergaard; Manjula Canagaratna; Miikka Dal Maso; Torsten Berndt; Tuukka Petäjä; Andreas Wahner; Veli-Matti Kerminen; Markku Kulmala; Douglas R Worsnop; Jürgen Wildt; Thomas F Mentel Journal: Nature Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ying-Hsuan Lin; Zhenfa Zhang; Kenneth S Docherty; Haofei Zhang; Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini; Caitlin L Rubitschun; Stephanie L Shaw; Eladio M Knipping; Eric S Edgerton; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Avram Gold; Jason D Surratt Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Hilary M Chase; Junming Ho; Mary Alice Upshur; Regan J Thomson; Victor S Batista; Franz M Geiger Journal: J Phys Chem A Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Lindsay D Yee; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; Rebecca A Wernis; Meng Meng; Ventura Rivera; Nathan M Kreisberg; Susanne V Hering; Mads S Bering; Marianne Glasius; Mary Alice Upshur; Ariana Gray Bé; Regan J Thomson; Franz M Geiger; John H Offenberg; Michael Lewandowski; Ivan Kourtchev; Markus Kalberer; Suzane de Sá; Scot T Martin; M Lizabeth Alexander; Brett B Palm; Weiwei Hu; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Douglas A Day; Jose L Jimenez; Yingjun Liu; Karena A McKinney; Paulo Artaxo; Juarez Viegas; Antonio Manzi; Maria B Oliveira; Rodrigo de Souza; Luiz A T Machado; Karla Longo; Allen H Goldstein Journal: Atmos Chem Phys Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 6.133
Authors: Mary Alice Upshur; Marvin M Vega; Ariana Gray Bé; Hilary M Chase; Yue Zhang; Aashish Tuladhar; Zizwe A Chase; Li Fu; Carlena J Ebben; Zheming Wang; Scot T Martin; Franz M Geiger; Regan J Thomson Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Pengfei Liu; Mijung Song; Tianning Zhao; Sachin S Gunthe; Suhan Ham; Yipeng He; Yi Ming Qin; Zhaoheng Gong; Juliana C Amorim; Allan K Bertram; Scot T Martin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 14.919