Literature DB >> 28775879

Synthesis and characterization of 3-methyl-6-[(propyn-yloxy)meth-yl]-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione.

Igor Elkin1, Thierry Maris2, Patrice Hildgen1.   

Abstract

The number of known asymmetrically substituted hemilactides, important precursors for obtaining regular derivatives of polylactide polymers, is still limited and structural characterization of most of them is incomplete. In the title racemic 1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione derivative, C9H10O5, the hemilactide heterocycle exhibits a twist-boat conformation. The bulkier propynyloxymethyl group is in an axial position with a gauche conformation for the CH2-O-CH2-C segment. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by pairs of C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers. The dimers are linked by further C-H⋯O contacts, forming a three-dimensional structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-methyl-6-propynyloxymethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione; crystal structure; lactide; synthesis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28775879      PMCID: PMC5499287          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017008581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Cyclic dilactides, or hemilactides, close structural analogs of 1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (glycolide) with methyl- or methyl­ene-containing substituents at the sp 3 C atoms, are the most important precursors for obtaining polylactide polymers, which are widely employed in biodegradable plastics and in the food and biomedical industries due to their intrinsic biocompatibility and biodegradability (Gerhardt et al., 2006 ▸). Well-tuned architectures of substituted hemilactides lead to the creation of new polylactide materials with regular structures that allow clarification of polymer behaviour at the supra­molecular level, as well as achieving new useful properties (Fuoco et al., 2016 ▸; Trimaille et al., 2007 ▸; Zhang & Song, 2014 ▸). Nevertheless, the further development of the field is hampered by the fact that asymmetrically substituted hemilactides still constitute a very limited group of compounds, the structural characterization of most of which remains incomplete. In this context, the goal of the present study was to elaborate a reliable protocol for obtaining 3-methyl-6-[(propyn­yloxy)meth­yl]-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione, 1.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecule of the final product (Fig. 1 ▸) possesses a 1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione six-membered ring, as well as the two different substituents, i.e. methyl and propynyloxymethyl groups, linked to atoms C1 and C3, respectively, determining the aimed architecture of 1. In general, the bond lengths and angles are in normal ranges for organic carbohydrates. The hemilactide heterocycle exhibits a twisted boat conformation, where atoms C1, C2 and O1 are in one plane and atoms C1, C3, C4 and O2 are in another plane; the planes are inclined at a dihedral angle of 27.9 (2)°. The values of the observed puckering parameters [θ = 84.8 (3)° and φ = 308.2 (3)°] deviate slightly from those corresponding to an ideal boat conformation (θ = 90° and φ = 300°). Two stereocentres represented by the C1 and C3 atoms have opposite chirality, i.e. R,S (and S,R in the centrosymmetric counterpart), the substituents at which adopt a trans configuration with respect to the ring, by minimizing repulsive inter­actions. The bulkier propynyloxymethyl group is located above the ring, i.e. in the axial position with a gauche conf­ormation for the C6—O5—C7—C8 segment, at a dihedral angle of 71.3 (2)°. A similar conformation has been observed in meso-3,6-dipropargyloxymethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (Zhang et al., 2015 ▸).
Figure 1

The atom-numbering diagram of the mol­ecule of 1. C and O atoms are shown as displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal cell of 1 (Fig. 2 ▸), all the 1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione rings are located in parallel planes at a distance of approximately 2.0 Å, but do not tend to form mol­ecular stacks and organize the rings neither into columns, as reported for hemilactides bearing relatively small substituents, such as 3,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (van Hummel et al., 1982 ▸) and 3-bromo-3,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione and 3-methyl­ene-6-methyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (Fiore et al., 2010 ▸), nor into supra­molecular formations where one half of the parallel plane is perpendicular to the other, as reported in the cases of 3-benzyl­oxymethyl-6-methyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (Kooijman et al., 2005 ▸) and 3,6-diphenyl-l,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (Lynch et al., 1990 ▸). In addition, the crystal packing shows some short C—H⋯O contacts (Table 1 ▸) leading to the pairwise mol­ecular binding, i.e. by hydrogen bonds. It is assumed that the packing is mostly determined by the contact involving the acid acetylenyl H9 and ketone O4 atoms (Fig. 2 ▸), analogous to the centrosymmetric inter­actions reported for symmetric meso-3,6-dipropargyloxymethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (Zhang et al., 2015 ▸). It is worthy of note that the unit cell contains no residual solvent-accessible voids.
Figure 2

A view along the b axis of the crystal packing of 1. Weak C—H⋯O contacts involving the acetylenyl H and ketone O atoms are shown as dotted lines.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯O4i 0.92 (2)2.60 (2)3.247 (3)127.8 (16)
C3—H3⋯O50.92 (2)2.49 (2)3.033 (2)118.1 (16)
C6—H6B⋯O3ii 0.99 (3)2.47 (2)3.369 (3)151.0 (19)
C7—H7A⋯O3iii 0.98 (2)2.66 (2)3.627 (3)169.1 (18)
C9—H9⋯O4iv 0.88 (3)2.58 (3)3.412 (3)156 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.38 with two updates; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for pure and functionalized lactides (i.e. glycolides with one methyl substituent) returned 25 entries, including different lactide stereoisomers (Kooijman et al., 2014 ▸; Fedushkin et al., 2009 ▸; van Hummel et al., 1982 ▸) and other derivatives (Zhang et al., 2015 ▸; Fiore et al., 2010 ▸; Kooijman et al., 2005 ▸; Bolte et al.,1994 ▸; Lynch et al., 1990 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

The desired product 1 was obtained from the initial rac-1-chloro­propane-2,3-diol (2) via a three-step pathway (see Fig. 3 ▸) inspired partly by general protocols (Bredikhina et al., 2014 ▸; Trimaille et al., 2004 ▸; Nagase et al., 2008 ▸), comprising the oxidation of 2 to rac-3-chloro-2-hy­droxy­propanoic acid (3) followed by the etherification with propargyl alcohol to 2-hy­droxy-1-(propynyloxymeth­yl)propanoic acid (4) and the final double esterification of 4 with bromo­propyonyl bromide. The final purification of 1 was performed by auto-flash-chromatography on silica, using chloro­form as eluent to give, after evaporation under reduced pressure, a white crystalline solid (see supporting information for more details on the synthesis and structural characterization of the inter­mediate and final products).
Figure 3

Scheme of the chemical synthesis of the title compound 3-methyl-6-[(propyn­yloxy)meth­yl]-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (1).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. H atoms were located from Fourier difference maps and fully refined.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H10O5
M r 198.17
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)6.9774 (5), 6.8273 (5), 19.4895 (14)
β (°)95.804 (3)
V3)923.66 (12)
Z 4
Radiation typeGa Kα, λ = 1.34139 Å
μ (mm−1)0.65
Crystal size (mm)0.11 × 0.08 × 0.08
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker Venture Metaljet
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.570, 0.752
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections19524, 2055, 1640
R int 0.073
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.652
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.063, 0.183, 1.05
No. of reflections2055
No. of parameters168
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.35, −0.37

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017008581/ff2148sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017008581/ff2148Isup2.hkl Details related to the synthesis, purification and characterization techniques used in the study. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017008581/ff2148sup3.pdf Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017008581/ff2148Isup4.cml CCDC reference: 1555000 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H10O5F(000) = 416
Mr = 198.17Dx = 1.425 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cGa Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å
a = 6.9774 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9932 reflections
b = 6.8273 (5) Åθ = 4.0–60.8°
c = 19.4895 (14) ŵ = 0.65 mm1
β = 95.804 (3)°T = 100 K
V = 923.66 (12) Å3Chunk, clear light colourless
Z = 40.11 × 0.08 × 0.08 mm
Bruker Venture Metaljet diffractometer2055 independent reflections
Radiation source: Metal Jet, Gallium Liquid Metal Jet Source1640 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Helios MX Mirror Optics monochromatorRint = 0.073
Detector resolution: 10.24 pixels mm-1θmax = 60.9°, θmin = 4.0°
ω and φ scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.570, Tmax = 0.752l = −25→25
19524 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullAll H-atom parameters refined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1166P)2 + 0.2436P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.183(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
2055 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.37 e Å3
168 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0045 (17)
Experimental. X-ray crystallographic data for I were collected from a single crystal sample, which was mounted on a loop fiber. Data were collected using a Bruker Venture diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 CMOS Detector, a Helios MX optics and a Kappa goniometer. The crystal-to-detector distance was 4.0 cm, and the data collection was carried out in 1024 x 1024 pixel mode.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.8442 (2)0.6986 (2)0.38601 (7)0.0450 (4)
O20.8604 (2)0.3277 (2)0.44578 (7)0.0445 (4)
O31.0103 (2)0.5925 (2)0.30315 (8)0.0528 (5)
O40.7313 (2)0.4446 (2)0.53563 (7)0.0500 (4)
O50.5693 (2)0.3519 (2)0.32715 (7)0.0433 (4)
C10.8967 (3)0.3454 (3)0.37415 (10)0.0442 (5)
H11.029 (4)0.277 (3)0.3718 (12)0.047 (6)*
C20.9217 (3)0.5552 (3)0.35135 (10)0.0427 (5)
C30.7092 (3)0.6521 (3)0.43558 (10)0.0413 (5)
H30.591 (3)0.624 (3)0.4123 (11)0.033 (5)*
C40.7669 (3)0.4688 (3)0.47711 (10)0.0412 (5)
C50.6982 (4)0.8289 (4)0.48109 (12)0.0490 (6)
H5A0.817 (4)0.861 (4)0.5017 (13)0.050 (6)*
H5B0.656 (4)0.940 (4)0.4515 (14)0.059 (7)*
H5C0.613 (4)0.797 (4)0.5153 (16)0.061 (8)*
C60.7425 (3)0.2424 (3)0.32707 (12)0.0452 (5)
H6A0.725 (3)0.111 (4)0.3442 (12)0.041 (6)*
H6B0.783 (3)0.234 (3)0.2801 (14)0.047 (6)*
C70.4081 (3)0.2573 (3)0.28966 (11)0.0472 (5)
H7A0.299 (3)0.349 (3)0.2863 (11)0.041 (6)*
H7B0.440 (3)0.222 (3)0.2426 (14)0.047 (6)*
C80.3455 (3)0.0836 (3)0.32598 (10)0.0437 (5)
C90.2952 (3)−0.0550 (3)0.35607 (12)0.0476 (5)
H90.252 (4)−0.157 (4)0.3776 (15)0.060 (8)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0527 (9)0.0485 (8)0.0346 (8)−0.0021 (6)0.0088 (6)0.0033 (6)
O20.0478 (8)0.0505 (8)0.0355 (8)0.0025 (6)0.0065 (6)0.0062 (6)
O30.0586 (9)0.0640 (10)0.0373 (8)−0.0117 (7)0.0125 (7)−0.0011 (7)
O40.0548 (9)0.0617 (9)0.0338 (8)−0.0022 (7)0.0066 (6)0.0060 (6)
O50.0446 (8)0.0472 (8)0.0383 (8)−0.0030 (6)0.0057 (6)−0.0039 (6)
C10.0453 (11)0.0522 (12)0.0367 (11)0.0023 (9)0.0119 (9)0.0025 (8)
C20.0436 (11)0.0538 (12)0.0310 (10)−0.0062 (9)0.0050 (8)0.0003 (8)
C30.0411 (10)0.0519 (11)0.0311 (9)0.0003 (9)0.0048 (8)0.0023 (8)
C40.0392 (10)0.0520 (11)0.0321 (10)−0.0041 (8)0.0028 (8)0.0017 (8)
C50.0534 (13)0.0552 (13)0.0380 (11)0.0041 (10)0.0035 (10)−0.0019 (9)
C60.0521 (12)0.0463 (11)0.0390 (11)0.0015 (9)0.0128 (9)−0.0016 (8)
C70.0511 (12)0.0557 (12)0.0344 (10)−0.0038 (10)0.0026 (9)−0.0012 (9)
C80.0445 (11)0.0535 (12)0.0327 (10)−0.0027 (9)0.0019 (8)−0.0055 (8)
C90.0503 (12)0.0507 (12)0.0419 (11)−0.0062 (10)0.0049 (9)−0.0031 (9)
O1—C21.335 (3)C3—C41.522 (3)
O1—C31.451 (2)C3—C51.505 (3)
O2—C11.449 (3)C5—H5A0.91 (3)
O2—C41.344 (3)C5—H5B0.98 (3)
O3—C21.203 (3)C5—H5C0.96 (3)
O4—C41.203 (3)C6—H6A0.97 (2)
O5—C61.421 (3)C6—H6B0.99 (3)
O5—C71.432 (3)C7—H7A0.98 (2)
C1—H11.04 (2)C7—H7B1.00 (3)
C1—C21.515 (3)C7—C81.470 (3)
C1—C61.515 (3)C8—C91.184 (3)
C3—H30.92 (2)C9—H90.88 (3)
C2—O1—C3119.98 (16)C3—C5—H5A110.8 (16)
C4—O2—C1121.22 (16)C3—C5—H5B107.6 (15)
C6—O5—C7112.74 (16)C3—C5—H5C107.4 (16)
O2—C1—H1104.3 (14)H5A—C5—H5B106 (2)
O2—C1—C2113.46 (17)H5A—C5—H5C110 (2)
O2—C1—C6111.23 (18)H5B—C5—H5C115 (2)
C2—C1—H1106.6 (13)O5—C6—C1107.90 (17)
C6—C1—H1110.0 (13)O5—C6—H6A110.3 (13)
C6—C1—C2110.91 (17)O5—C6—H6B111.0 (14)
O1—C2—C1118.72 (18)C1—C6—H6A109.2 (13)
O3—C2—O1120.44 (19)C1—C6—H6B109.7 (14)
O3—C2—C1120.83 (19)H6A—C6—H6B108.8 (19)
O1—C3—H3109.1 (13)O5—C7—H7A108.0 (13)
O1—C3—C4112.30 (16)O5—C7—H7B109.8 (14)
O1—C3—C5106.96 (18)O5—C7—C8112.01 (17)
C4—C3—H3105.6 (13)H7A—C7—H7B109.8 (18)
C5—C3—H3111.0 (13)C8—C7—H7A106.4 (13)
C5—C3—C4111.88 (17)C8—C7—H7B110.8 (13)
O2—C4—C3117.51 (17)C9—C8—C7179.1 (2)
O4—C4—O2119.26 (18)C8—C9—H9177.3 (19)
O4—C4—C3123.22 (19)
O1—C3—C4—O2−31.7 (2)C3—O1—C2—O3168.81 (18)
O1—C3—C4—O4149.05 (19)C3—O1—C2—C1−11.5 (3)
O2—C1—C2—O1−23.6 (3)C4—O2—C1—C230.6 (3)
O2—C1—C2—O3156.06 (19)C4—O2—C1—C6−95.2 (2)
O2—C1—C6—O570.2 (2)C5—C3—C4—O2−152.00 (19)
C1—O2—C4—O4176.43 (18)C5—C3—C4—O428.8 (3)
C1—O2—C4—C3−2.8 (3)C6—O5—C7—C871.3 (2)
C2—O1—C3—C439.0 (2)C6—C1—C2—O1102.4 (2)
C2—O1—C3—C5162.14 (17)C6—C1—C2—O3−77.9 (2)
C2—C1—C6—O5−57.0 (2)C7—O5—C6—C1−174.10 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···O4i0.92 (2)2.60 (2)3.247 (3)127.8 (16)
C3—H3···O50.92 (2)2.49 (2)3.033 (2)118.1 (16)
C6—H6B···O3ii0.99 (3)2.47 (2)3.369 (3)151.0 (19)
C7—H7A···O3iii0.98 (2)2.66 (2)3.627 (3)169.1 (18)
C9—H9···O4iv0.88 (3)2.58 (3)3.412 (3)156 (2)
  8 in total

1.  A Route to Aliphatic Poly(ester)s with Thiol Pendant Groups: From Monomer Design to Editable Porous Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tiziana Fuoco; Anna Finne-Wistrand; Daniela Pappalardo
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Amphiphilic degradable polymers for immobilization and sustained delivery of sphingosine 1-phosphate.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Jie Song
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Synthesis and click chemistry of a new class of biodegradable polylactide towards tunable thermo-responsive biomaterials.

Authors:  Quanxuan Zhang; Hong Ren; Gregory L Baker
Journal:  Polym Chem       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.582

4.  Poly(hexyl-substituted lactides): novel injectable hydrophobic drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Thomas Trimaille; Robert Gurny; Michael Möller
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination.

Authors:  Lennard Krause; Regine Herbst-Irmer; George M Sheldrick; Dietmar Stalke
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.304

6.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.