| Literature DB >> 28775716 |
Leila Vali1, Ali A Dashti1, Febine Mathew1, Edet E Udo2.
Abstract
The objective of this investigation was to identify the lineages of MRSA and MSSA with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in Kuwaiti hospitals. 121 clinical MRSA and 56 MSSA isolates were included in this study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for a selection of agents including chlorhexidine and resistance genes were amplified and sequenced. PFGE, spa typing, and MLST were completed for a selection of isolates. The results showed SCCmec II, III, IV, and V were present in 0.8, 21.5, 69.4, and 8.3% of the MRSA isolates. agr-1Sa was the most prevalent type in both MSSA (48%) and MRSA (54%). Forty-five percentage of MRSA contained pvl and 39% contained lukE-lukD, however, as many as 86% of MSSA contained pvl and 96.4% contained lukE-lukD. qac A-C genes were identified in 12.3% of MRSA, norA was present in 82.6% and blaZ in 94.2%. Among MSSA only 5.4% harbored qacA, 83% contained norA, and 91% blaZ. Multi-drug resistant ST239/t945 lineage containing a qac gene was the most identified S. aureus. However, other lineages, including ST772-MRSA-V/t4867/pvl(+)qacC/smr and non-qac harboring lineages of ST217-MRSAIV/t3244/pvl(-), ST34-MSSA/t161/pvl(+), ST5-MSSA/t688/pvl(+), ST5-MSSA/t4867/norA(+), and ST672-MSSA/t003/pvl(-), also showed reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine. The observed reduced susceptibility of non-qac dependent MSSA isolates to chlorhexidine suggests the involvement of other elements in promoting higher MBC (≥30 mg/L). Our results confirm that monitoring MSSA is essential as they may have the potential to survive low level biocide exposure.Entities:
Keywords: MLST; MRSA; MSSA; PFGE; chlorhexidine; spa typing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28775716 PMCID: PMC5517409 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Clinical MRSA and MSSA isolates obtained from hospitals.
| Adan | 10 | 0 |
| Amiri | 16 | 2 |
| Razi | 6 | 0 |
| Sabah | 30 | 11 |
| Armed Forces | 0 | 7 |
| Chest | 1 | 5 |
| Farwaniya | 24 | 3 |
| Ibn Sina | 0 | 1 |
| Jahra | 1 | 2 |
| Maternity | 13 | 4 |
| Mubaarak | 20 | 17 |
| Unknown | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 121 | 56 |
Sources of isolates in this study.
| Abscess | 7 | 0 |
| Broncho Alveolar Lavage (BAL) | 0 | 1 |
| Blood | 7 | 8 |
| Ear | 5 | 3 |
| Eye | 4 | 2 |
| Fluid | 5 | 1 |
| Groin | 11 | 3 |
| High Vaginal Swab | 1 | 3 |
| Nasal | 26 | 8 |
| Catheter Tip | 2 | 1 |
| Pus | 14 | 2 |
| Rectal Swab | 1 | 0 |
| Skin | 12 | 4 |
| Sputum | 1 | 2 |
| Suction Tip | 0 | 2 |
| Swab | 6 | 1 |
| Thigh Abscess Pus | 0 | 1 |
| Tissue | 2 | 2 |
| Throat swab | 1 | 1 |
| Tracheal | 2 | 1 |
| Umbilical Swab | 1 | 1 |
| Urine | 2 | 0 |
| Wound | 10 | 5 |
| Unknown | 1 | 4 |
Figure 1The percentage of virulence genes detected in MSSA isolates is higher than MRSA.
Figure 2Relationship between spa types of MSSA and MRSA isolates in this study. Node size is proportional to spa type frequency and line length is proportional to the number of mutational steps between the types. The node distances between the spa types was calculated by minimum spanning tree method using Dice correlation (BioNumerics v.7.1.). Based on the default setting of 1%, distance intervals are created that are converted into distance units. For example two entries when having a similarity of 99.6% will have a distance of 0 (interval 100–99% = distance 0). Two entries that have a similarity of 98.7% will have a distance of 1 (interval 99–98% = distance 1).
Figure 3In this figure the combination of biocide resistance genes observed among the isolates has been shown.
Percentage of resistance to each antimicrobial agent tested.
| Penicillin | 121 (100) | 47 (84) |
| Cefoxitin | 121 (100) | 0 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 40 (33) | 14 (25) |
| Chloramphenicol | 2 (1.7) | 0 |
| Clindamycin (C) | 35 (29) | 16(29) |
| Clindamycin (I) | 13 (11) | 0 |
| Erythromycin | 49 (40) | 16 (29) |
| Fusidic Acid | 24 (20) | 5 (9) |
| Gentamicin | 41 (34) | 38 (68) |
| Kanamycin | 52 (43) | 27 (48) |
| Mupirocin (HLR) | 4 (3.3) | 0 |
| Mupirocin (LLR) | 11 (9) | 0 |
| Tetracycline | 34 (28) | 16 (29) |
| Trimethoprim | 34 (28) | 7 (7) |
| Vancomycin | 2 (1.7) | 0 |
(C) Constitutive resistance to clindamycin;
(I) Inducible resistance to clindamycin;
(HLR) High level resistance to mupirocin;
(LLR) Low level resistance to mupirocin.
Typing characteristics and antimicrobial profile of qac(+) MRSA and MSSA and qac(–) isolates with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine.
| R-3 | 22 | t4326 | IV | Groin | MUBARAK (ICU) | – | + | + | – | – | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, Cli I, Tri, Cip |
| R-4 | 22 | t852 | IV | Nasal | MUBARAK (ICU) | – | + | + | + | – | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, Cli C, Tri, Cip |
| R-12 | 22 | t852 | IV | Eye | MATERNITY | – | + | + | + | – | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tri |
| R-13 | 22 | t902 | IV | Nasal | SABAH (PICU) | – | – | + | + | – | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tri |
| R-15 | 239 | t860 | III | Groin | MUBARAK (Surgical) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 15 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip, Van |
| R-21 | 239 | t945 | III | Nasal | SABAH (ICU) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR |
| R-38 | 239 | t945 | III | Catheter Tip | SABAH (Internal) | A | – | + | – | – | 1 | 7.5 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR |
| R-45 | 239 | t860 | III | Groin | MUBARAK (Surgical) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip, Mup |
| R-53 | 239 | t860 | III | Blood | MATERNITY (NICU) | A | + | + | – | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tri, Fus, Cip,MupHLR |
| R-62 | 5 | t002 | II | Nasal | AMIRI (Internal) | – | + | + | – | + | 2 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Cip, MupHLR |
| R-67 | 80 | t044 | IV | Abscess | AMIRI | – | + | + | + | + | 1 | 1.875 | Pen, Kan, Tet, Fus, MupHLR |
| R-84 | 239 | t945 | III | Blood | SABAH (ICU) | A | + | + | + | + | 1 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip, MupLLR |
| R-87 | 80 | t044 | IV | Tissue | SABAH (PICU) | – | + | + | + | + | 1 | 1.875 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, Cli I, Tri, Cip, MupLLR |
| R-101 | 239 | t945 | III | Skin | SABAH (Internal) | A | + | + | + | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip |
| R-102 | 239 | t860 | III | Nasal | MUBARAK (Surgical) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 7.5 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR |
| R-103 | 239 | t860 | III | Pus | MUBARAK (Liver dialysis) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupHLR |
| R-104 | 239 | t860 | III | Groin | MUBARAK (Surgical) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR, |
| R-105 | 239 | t945 | III | Groin | SABAH (SICU) | A | – | + | – | – | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR |
| R-106 | 239 | t860 | III | Nasal | RAZI (Isolation Unit) | A | – | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,Mup LLR |
| R-107 | 239 | t945 | III | Tracheal | SABAH (Surgical) | B | – | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip,MupLLR |
| R-110 | 239 | t945 | III | Sputum | RAZI (Surgery) | – | + | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip, MupLLR |
| R-111 | 239 | t945 | III | Fluid | SABAH (Outpatient) | – | + | + | – | + | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Ery, CliC, Tet, Fus, Cip, MupLLR |
| R-113 | 22 | t2518 | IV | Pus | FARWANIYA (Surgical) | A | – | + | + | – | 1 | 0.94 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Cip |
| S-7 | 239 | t945 | MSSA | Skin | SABAH (Internal) | A | + | + | + | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Cip, Tri |
| S-19 | 1 | t127 | MSSA | High Vaginal Swab | MATERNITY | – | + | + | + | + | 3 | 30 | Pen, Kan |
| S-22 | 88 | t4045 | MSSA | Blood | MUBARAK | – | + | + | + | + | 3 | 60 | Pen, Kan, Tob |
| S-23 | 97 | t359 | MSSA | Blood | MUBARAK | – | + | + | + | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Kan, Tob |
| S-24 | 5 | t4867 | MSSA | Ear | SABAH | – | + | + | + | + | 2 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Tri |
| S-25 | 1 | t127 | MSSA | Nasal | SABAH (Internal) | – | + | + | + | + | 3 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob |
| S-27 | 22 | t223 | MSSA | Eye | MUBARAK (Pediatric) | – | + | + | – | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Tob, Kan |
| S-32 | 5 | t002 | MSSA | Skin | FARWANIYA (Pediatric) | – | + | + | + | + | 2 | 30 | Cip, Gen, Kan,Tob |
| S-35 | 15 | t084 | MSSA | High Vaginal Swab | MUBARAK | – | + | + | + | + | 2 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob |
| S-41 | 932 | t304 | MSSA | Sputum | SABAH (ICU) | – | + | + | + | + | 3 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob |
| S-42 | 672 | t003 | MSSA | Blood | FARWANIYA | – | – | + | – | + | 1 | >60 | Pen, Kan, Tob, Tri |
| S-43 | 965 | t062 | MSSA | Sputum | – | – | – | – | + | + | 2 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob |
| S-44 | 239 | t945 | MSSA | Groin | – | – | – | + | + | + | 1 | >60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Ery, Cip |
| S-46 | 5 | t688 | MSSA | Nasal | ICU | – | – | – | + | + | 2 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, |
| S-47 | 217 | t3244 | IV | Blood | AMIRI(ICU) | – | + | + | – | – | 1 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Ery, Cip, Tri |
| S-48 | 239 | t945 | MSSA | Groin | SABAH (Surgical) | – | – | + | + | + | 1 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Ery, Cip |
| S-49 | 97 | t359 | MSSA | High Vaginal Swab | MATERNITY | – | – | – | + | + | 1 | 30 | Kan, Tob, Tri |
| S-50 | 96 | t521 | MSSA | Suction tip | ARMED FORCES | – | – | + | + | + | 3 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Cip, Tri, |
| S-51 | 5 | t4867 | MSSA | Tracheal | SABAH (ICU) | – | + | + | + | + | 2 | 60 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Tri |
| S-52 | 772 | t4867 | V | Nasal Swab | SABAH (Surgical) | C | + | + | + | + | 2 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Cip, Tri, Van |
| S-53 | 34 | t166 | MSSA | Umbilical Swab | MUBARAK(NICU) | – | + | + | + | + | 3 | 30 | Pen, Kan, Tob, Tri |
| S-56 | 239 | t945 | MSSA | Groin | SABAH (Surgical) | A | + | + | + | + | 1 | 30 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Ery, Cip |
| S-57 | 239 | t945 | MSSA | Swab | SABAH (Surgical) | A | + | + | + | + | 1 | 7.5 | Pen, Gen, Kan, Tob, Cip |
Cip, Ciprofloxacin; Chl, Chloramphenicol; CHX MBC, Chlorhexidine Minimum Bactericidal Concentration; Cli.
Figure 4PFGE profiles of qac(+) MRSA and MSSA and qac(–) isolates with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine. The hierarchic Cluster analysis and phylogenetic tree after digestion with SmaI is shown. PFGE banding patterns were analyzed using DICE/UPGMA with an optimization of 1.5% and a tolerance of 1.5% generated by BioNumerics software (v.7.1). The percentage of similarities between the clusters are shown.