| Literature DB >> 28775655 |
Agata Piasecka1, Izabela Krzemińska1, Jerzy Tys1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of beet molasses, an agro-industrial by-product, as an alternative culture medium component for photoheterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation of Parachlorella kessleri. Application of beet molasses improved microalgal cell growth and modified the biochemical composition of P. kessleri biomass. During the addition of molasses to culture media with simultaneous aeration, the maximum biomass productivity, oil and protein productivity, and calorific value were 0.42 g L-1 day-1, 112.56 and 244.95 mg L-1 day-1, and 22.1 MJ kg-1, respectively. Under these conditions, the total content of polyunsaturated C16-C18 fatty acids decreased, which was suitable for application in biodiesel. Besides oils and carbohydrates, P. kessleri had an ability to synthesize significant amounts of proteins, especially during molasses utilization. This provides a possibility of a wide range of non-fuel applications of P. kessleri biomass.Entities:
Keywords: Beet molasses; Biodiesel; Calorific value; Chlorophyta; Parachlorella kessleri; Proteins
Year: 2017 PMID: 28775655 PMCID: PMC5514195 DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1081-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Phycol ISSN: 0921-8971 Impact factor: 3.215
Fig. 1Growth curves of Parachlorella kessleri cultured under control (K), autotrophic (KA), photoheterotrophic (KM), and mixotrophic (KMA) culture conditions (the results are presented as the means of n = 9 measurements from three biological replicates; error bars represent standard deviation)
Fig. 2Dynamics of the specific growth rate during the Parachlorella kessleri cultivation (the results are presented as the means of n = 9 measurements from three biological replicates; error bars represent standard deviation)
Summary of growth parameters of Parachlorella kessleri cultured under control (K), autotrophic (KA), photoheterotrophic (KM), and mixotrophic (KMA) culture conditions
| Type of cultivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | KA | KM | KMA | |
| Biomass yield (g L−1) | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 3.31 ± 0.32 | 2.24 ± 0.05 | 5.10 ± 0.69 |
| Biomass productivity (g L−1 day−1) | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.42 ± 0.06 |
| Specific growth rate 0–3 (day−1) | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.01 |
| Biomass doubling time 0–72 (h) | 86.2 ± 0.4 | 52.1 ± 2.6 | 24.9 ± 3.1 | 21.0 ± 0.3 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of nine replicates
Fig. 3Effect of different feeding strategies on the biochemical composition and oil (a), protein (b), and carbohydrate productivity (c) (mg L−1) of P. kessleri (the results are presented as the means of n = 9 measurements from three biological replicates; error bars represent standard deviation)
Production of oil, carbohydrate, and protein expressed as daily productivity
| Type of cultivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | KA | KM | KMA | |
| Daily oil productivity (mg L−1 day−1) | 15.67 ± 1.39 | 86.71 ± 8.36 | 57.07 ± 1.40 | 112.56 ± 15.29 |
| Daily carbohydrate productivity (mg L−1 day−1) | 12.51 ± 1.11 | 57.09 ± 5.50 | 23.87 ± 0.59 | 50.97 ± 6.92 |
| Daily protein productivity (mg L−1 day−1) | 23.40 ± 2.08 | 109.62 ± 10.56 | 105.38 ± 2.59 | 244.95 ± 33.28 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of nine replicates
Fatty acid profile of Parachlorella kessleri cultured under control (K), autotrophic (KA), photoheterotrophic (KM), and mixotrophic (KMA) culture conditions
| FAME (%) | Type of cultivation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | KA | KM | KMA | |
| C16:0 | 23.38 ± 4.41 | 18.31 ± 0.97 | 17.01 ± 2.97 | 21.31 ± 1.42 |
| C16:1 | 1.10 ± 0.00 | 1.03 ± 0.54 | 2.26 ± 0.33 | 2.79 ± 0.28 |
| C18:0 | 10.48 ± 3.88 | 4.01 ± 0.55 | 3.19 ± 0.90 | 5.12 ± 1.12 |
| C18:1 | 17.81 ± 4.40 | 17.51 ± 3.70 | 16.55 ± 1.28 | 17.52 ± 0.18 |
| C18:2 | 20.53 ± 5.72 | 28.81 ± 1.48 | 23.25 ± 2.24 | 17.13 ± 0.52 |
| C18:3 | 15.87 ± 5.37 | 14.02 ± 3.30 | 8.60 ± 0.96 | 7.05 ± 0.28 |
| Total C16-C18 | 88.26 ± 5.07 | 83.51 ± 2.46 | 70.86 ± 3.01 | 70.92 ± 0.69 |
| Others | 11.74 ± 5.07 | 16.49 ± 2.46 | 29.14 ± 3.01 | 29.08 ± 0.69 |
| SFAa | 33.86 ± 6.65 | 22.32 ± 1.25 | 20.20 ± 3.48 | 26.43 ± 1.20 |
| MUFAb | 18.00 ± 4.29 | 18.36 ± 3.80 | 18.81 ± 1.55 | 26.86 ± 5.90 |
| PUFAc | 36.41 ± 4.15 | 42.83 ± 3.94 | 31.86 ± 3.00 | 24.17 ± 0.63 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of six replicates
aUnsaturated fatty acids among total C16-C18
bMonounsaturated fatty acids among total C16-C18
cPolyunsaturated fatty acids among total C16-C18
Fig. 4Calorific value of P. kessleri cultured under control (K), autotrophic (KA), photoheterotrophic (KM), and mixotrophic (KMA) culture conditions (the results are presented as the means of n = 9 measurements from three biological replicates; error bars represent standard deviation)