Literature DB >> 28775470

OUR FIRST HUNDRED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMIES.

Atul K Sharma1, H K Rangan2, R P Choubey2.   

Abstract

Hundred patients with symptomatic gallstone disease underwent laparosopic cholecystectomy between June 1996 and August 1997. There were 78 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 46.2 (SD 17.8; range 21 to 85) years. The common presentations were right upper abdominal pain (n=66), acute cholecystitis (n=8) and history of jaundice (n=11). Sixteen patients underwent ERCP for suspected CBD stones. Endoscopic papillotomy and basketing cleared the CBD of all calculi in 12. Three patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy because of dense adhesions (n=2) and to control intraoperative haemorrhage (n=1). Mean operating time was 67.2 (SD 39.2; range 22 to 186) minutes. The mean requirement of analgesics was 2.8 (SD 1.3; range 2 to 5) doses and post-operative hospital stay was 1.6 (SD 1.4; range 1 to 7) days. All patients resumed normal activity within 14 days of operation and are well and satisfied with their operation at a median follow up of 8.6 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choledocholithiasis; Cholelithiasis; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28775470      PMCID: PMC5531577          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30537-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  19 in total

1.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C M Lo; C L Liu; E C Lai; S T Fan; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Current status of conventional (open) cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'?

Authors:  N J Soper; P T Stockmann; D L Dunnegan; S W Ashley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-08

5.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital.

Authors:  D R Baird; J P Wilson; E M Mason; T D Duncan; J S Evans; J P Luke; D M Ruben; G W Lucas
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cause of conversions in 1,300 patients and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  P Schrenk; R Woisetschläger; W U Wayand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can conversion be predicted?

Authors:  S S Sikora; A Kumar; R Saxena; V K Kapoor; S P Kaushik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Continuing hazards of the learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Morgenstern; M F McGrath; B J Carroll; M Paz-Partlow; G Berci
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.