| Literature DB >> 28775391 |
Charles A O Midega1, Charles J Wasonga1, Antony M Hooper2, John A Pickett2, Zeyaur R Khan1.
Abstract
The parasitic weed Striga hermonthica Benth. (Orobanchaceae), commonly known as striga, is an increasingly important constraint to cereal production in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), often resulting in total yield losses in maize (Zea mays L.) and substantial losses in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). This is further aggravated by soil degradation and drought conditions that are gradually becoming widespread in SSA. Forage legumes in the genus Desmodium (Fabaceae), mainly D. uncinatum and D. intortum, effectively control striga and improve crop productivity in SSA. However, negative effects of climate change such as drought stress is affecting the functioning of these systems. There is thus a need to identify and characterize new plants possessing the required ecological chemistry to protect crops against the biotic stress of striga under such environmental conditions. 17 accessions comprising 10 species of Desmodium were screened for their drought stress tolerance and ability to suppress striga. Desmodium incanum and D. ramosissimum were selected as the most promising species as they retained their leaves and maintained leaf function for longer periods during their exposure to drought stress conditions. They also had desirable phenotypes with more above ground biomass. The two species suppressed striga infestation, both under controlled and field conditions, and resulted in significant grain yield increases, demonstrating the incremental capability of Desmodium species in striga suppression. These results demonstrate beneficial effects of Desmodium species in enhancing cereal productivity in dry areas.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural productivity; Climate change; Desmodium; Drought-tolerance; Striga
Year: 2017 PMID: 28775391 PMCID: PMC5465939 DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crop Prot ISSN: 0261-2194 Impact factor: 2.571
Fig. 1Mean (±SE) Duration to whole plant wilting of 17 accessions of various Desmodium species during exposure to severe drought stress conditions in semi-restricted soil columns over a period of ten weeks. Each accession was replicated six times. Bars bearing different letters are significantly different (Tukeys HSD test, α = 0.05).
Fig. 2Mean (±SE) % leaf water content of D. ramosissimum, D. incanum and D. uncinatum as affected by six weeks of exposure to moderate (W2) and severe (W3) drought stress conditions and a well-watered control (W1) in restricted soil columns. Means are averages of four replicates. For a given species, bars marked by different letters are significantly different (Tukeys HSD test, α = 0.05).
Fig. 3Mean (±SE) leaf electrolyte conductivity of D. repandum, D. ramosissimum, D. incanum and D. uncinatum as affected by six weeks of exposure to moderate (W2) and severe (W3) drought stress conditions as well as a well-watered control (W1). The dotted bars indicate conductivity attributed to free electrolytes outside leaf cell membrane (apoplast) while the gray bars indicate conductivity attributed to total leaf electrolytes (electrolytes in the apoplast and symplast). Means represent averaged of four replicates. For each category of electrolytes in a given species, bars marked by different letters are significantly different (Tukeys HSD test, α = 0.05).
Fig. 4Mean (±SE) number of emerged striga plants per pot treated with and without Desmodium root exudates (n = 18). Within a graph, bars marked by different letters are significantly different (Tukeys HSD test, α = 0.05).
Mean (±SE) number of striga counts in sorghum plots planted in sole stands or intercropped with various Desmodium spp. at icipe-Thomas Odhiambo Campus, western Kenya during the long and short rainy seasons of 2015.
| Treatment | Mean striga counts LR 2015 | Grain yields (t/ha) | Mean striga counts SR 2015 | Grain yields (t/ha) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8th WAE | 12th WAE | 8th WAE | 12th WAE | |||
| Sorghum- | 15.5(6.3)b | 27.2(5.9)b | 3.96(0.21)a | 10.5(4.8)b | 30.7(11.7)b | 3.34(0.17)a |
| Sorghum- | 26.0(9.0)b | 24.3(10.6)b | 3.33(0.20)a | 7.0(3.2)b | 15.5(6.3)b | 3.32(0.29)a |
| Sorghum- | 26.7(8.5)b | 31.7(6.4)b | 3.26(0.40)a | 14.8(3.4)b | 32.7(12.0)b | 3.0(0.34)a |
| Sorghum- | 28.0(11.5)b | 31.5(9.0)b | 3.40(0.18)a | 24.2(9.3)b | 30.5(9.3)b | 2.93(0.38)a |
| Sorghum monocrop | 235.5(27.0)a | 315.2(21.1)a | 1.32(0.13)b | 305.8(27.6)a | 237.8(62.0)a | 1.23(0.18)b |
Within a sample period and cropping season (each column), means marked by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Mean (±SE) number of striga counts in sorghum plots planted in sole stands or intercropped with various Desmodium spp. in smallholder farmers' fields at two sites, Oyiengo and Nuani, in Homabay County, western Kenya during the long and short rainy seasons of 2015.
| Treatment | Mean number of emerged striga | Sorghum grain yields (t/ha) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oyiengo Site | Nuani Site | Oyiengo Site | Nuani Site | |||||
| LR 2015 | SR 2015 | LR 2015 | SR 2015 | LR 2015 | SR 2015 | LR 2015 | SR 2015 | |
| Sorghum- | 10.2(1.4)c | 39.5(17.9)b | 2.5(1.3)b | 0.8(0.5)c | 4.1(0.1)a | 3.3(0.2)a | 3.1(0.1)a | 2.6(0.2)a |
| Sorghum- | 19.5(4.8)bc | 24.0(10.4)b | 2.8(1.1)b | 11.8(2.8)b | 3.9(0.1)ab | 3.2(0.2)a | 2.9(0.1)ab | 2.8(0.3)a |
| Sorghum- | 22.7(6.0)bc | 60.0(11.6)ab | 6.0(1.9)b | 5.0(3.0)bc | 3.7(0.1)b | 2.9(0.2)a | 2.6(0.1)b | 2.5(0.3)a |
| Sorghum- | 36.7(9.1)b | 61.0(15.0)ab | 3.8(2.8)b | 13.0(1.2)b | 3.7(0.1)b | 3.1(0.2)a | 2.5(0.1)b | 2.6(0.2)a |
| Sorghum monocrop | 128(8.0)a | 173(45.5)a | 49(11.7)a | 85.2(8.7)a | 1.9(0.1)c | 1.9(0.1)b | 1.8(0.1)c | 1.7(0.1)b |
Within a site and cropping season (each column), means marked by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).