Gianfranco Matrone1, Shu Meng1, Qilin Gu1, Jie Lv1, Longhou Fang1, Kaifu Chen1, John P Cooke2. 1. From the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX. 2. From the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX. jpcooke@houstonmethodist.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lmo (LIM-domain-only)2 transcription factor is involved in hematopoiesis and vascular remodeling. Sphk (sphingosine kinase)1 phosphorylates sphingosine to S1P (sphingosine-1-phosphate). We hypothesized that Lmo2 regulates Sphk1 to promote endothelial cell (EC) migration and vascular development. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Lmo2 and Sphk1 knockdown (KD) were performed in Tg(fli1:EGFP) y1 zebrafish and in human umbilical vein EC. Rescue of phenotypes or overexpression of these factors were achieved using mRNA encoding Lmo2 or Sphk1. EC proliferation in vivo was assessed by BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of dissociated Tg(fli1:EGFP) y1 embryos. Cell migration was assessed by scratch assay in human umbilical vein EC and mouse aortic rings. Lmo2 interactions with Sphk1 promoter were assessed by ChIP-PCR (chromatin immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction). Lmo2 or Sphk1 KD reduced number and length of intersegmental vessels. There was no reduction in the numbers of GFP+ (green fluorescent protein) ECs after Lmo2 KD. However, reduced numbers of BrdU+GFP+ nuclei were observed along the dysmorphic intersegmental vessels, accumulating instead at the sprouting origin of the intersegmental vessels. This anomaly was likely because of impaired EC migration, which was confirmed in migration assays using Lmo2 KD human umbilical vein ECs and mouse aortic rings. Both in vivo and in vitro, Lmo2 KD reduced Sphk1 gene expression, associated with less Lmo2 binding to the Sphk1 promoter as assessed by ChIP-PCR. Sphk1 mRNA rescued the Lmo2 KD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that Lmo2 is necessary for Sphk1 gene expression in ECs. Lmo2 KD reduced Lmo2-Sphk1 gene interaction, impaired intersegmental vessels formation, and reduced cell migration. We identified for the first time Sphk1 as downstream effector of Lmo2.
OBJECTIVE: Lmo (LIM-domain-only)2 transcription factor is involved in hematopoiesis and vascular remodeling. Sphk (sphingosine kinase)1 phosphorylates sphingosine to S1P (sphingosine-1-phosphate). We hypothesized that Lmo2 regulates Sphk1 to promote endothelial cell (EC) migration and vascular development. APPROACH AND RESULTS:Lmo2 and Sphk1 knockdown (KD) were performed in Tg(fli1:EGFP) y1 zebrafish and in human umbilical vein EC. Rescue of phenotypes or overexpression of these factors were achieved using mRNA encoding Lmo2 or Sphk1. EC proliferation in vivo was assessed by BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of dissociated Tg(fli1:EGFP) y1 embryos. Cell migration was assessed by scratch assay in human umbilical vein EC and mouse aortic rings. Lmo2 interactions with Sphk1 promoter were assessed by ChIP-PCR (chromatin immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction). Lmo2 or Sphk1 KD reduced number and length of intersegmental vessels. There was no reduction in the numbers of GFP+ (green fluorescent protein) ECs after Lmo2 KD. However, reduced numbers of BrdU+GFP+ nuclei were observed along the dysmorphic intersegmental vessels, accumulating instead at the sprouting origin of the intersegmental vessels. This anomaly was likely because of impaired EC migration, which was confirmed in migration assays using Lmo2 KD human umbilical vein ECs and mouse aortic rings. Both in vivo and in vitro, Lmo2 KD reduced Sphk1 gene expression, associated with less Lmo2 binding to the Sphk1 promoter as assessed by ChIP-PCR. Sphk1 mRNA rescued the Lmo2 KD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that Lmo2 is necessary for Sphk1 gene expression in ECs. Lmo2 KD reduced Lmo2-Sphk1 gene interaction, impaired intersegmental vessels formation, and reduced cell migration. We identified for the first time Sphk1 as downstream effector of Lmo2.
Authors: Dita Gratzinger; Shuchun Zhao; Robert West; Robert V Rouse; Hannes Vogel; Elena Cubedo Gil; Ronald Levy; Izidore S Lossos; Yasodha Natkunam Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Nitai C Hait; Jeremy Allegood; Michael Maceyka; Graham M Strub; Kuzhuvelil B Harikumar; Sandeep K Singh; Cheng Luo; Ronen Marmorstein; Tomasz Kordula; Sheldon Milstien; Sarah Spiegel Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Debbie K Goode; Nadine Obier; M S Vijayabaskar; Michael Lie-A-Ling; Andrew J Lilly; Rebecca Hannah; Monika Lichtinger; Kiran Batta; Magdalena Florkowska; Rahima Patel; Mairi Challinor; Kirstie Wallace; Jane Gilmour; Salam A Assi; Pierre Cauchy; Maarten Hoogenkamp; David R Westhead; Georges Lacaud; Valerie Kouskoff; Berthold Göttgens; Constanze Bonifer Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Hong S Lu; Ann Marie Schmidt; Robert A Hegele; Nigel Mackman; Daniel J Rader; Christian Weber; Alan Daugherty Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Gianfranco Matrone; Bo Xia; Kaifu Chen; Martin A Denvir; Andrew H Baker; John P Cooke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Fabiola N Velazquez; Maria Hernandez-Corbacho; Magali Trayssac; Jeffrey L Stith; Joseph Bonica; Bernandie Jean; Michael J Pulkoski-Gross; Brittany L Carroll; Mohamed F Salama; Yusuf A Hannun; Ashley J Snider Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2020-12-05 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Bhairavi Swaminathan; Seock-Won Youn; L A Naiche; Jing Du; Stephanie R Villa; Jordan B Metz; Huijuan Feng; Chaolin Zhang; Raphael Kopan; Peter A Sims; Jan K Kitajewski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379