Literature DB >> 28774936

Prospective study of glaucoma referrals across Europe: are we using resources wisely?

Panayiota Founti1,2, Fotis Topouzis2, Gábor Holló3, Barbara Cvenkel4, Michele Iester5, Anna-Bettina Haidich6, Péter Kóthy3, Anneta Kiana2, Despoina Kolokotroni2, Ananth C Viswanathan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the outcomes of glaucoma referrals across different European countries.
METHODS: 250 patients newly referred to tertiary referral glaucoma specialist practices in the UK, Hungary, Slovenia, Italy and Greece were prospectively enrolled (50 consecutive patients per centre). Referral accuracy and predictive value of referral criteria for an intervention or further monitoring (positive predictive value) were analysed.
RESULTS: Same-day discharges occurred in 43% (95% CI 39% to 75%) (12/28) of optometrist-initiated referrals (UK only), 37% (95% CI 30% to 45%) (59/158) of ophthalmologist-initiated referrals (all centres) and 54% (95% CI 40% to 68%) (26/48) of self-referrals (Hungary, Italy and Greece). The percentages from all referral sources were 46% (95% CI 32% to 60%) in the UK, 56% (95% CI 44% to 70%) in Hungary, 30% (95% CI 17% to 43%) in Slovenia, 22% (95% CI 11% to 34%) in Italy and 60% (95% CI 46% to 74%) in Greece (p<0.001). Overall, the referring criterion was confirmed in 54% (95% CI 45% to 63%) (64/119) for intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, 56% (95% CI 43% to 69%) (33/59) for a suspicious optic disc and 61% (95% CI 45% to 77%) (22/36) for a suspicious visual field, with large between-country differences (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Of all referrals, 32% (95% CI 26% to 37%) were initiated on the basis of IOP >21 mm Hg only. By combining the IOP criterion with any other referring criterion, the positive predictive value increased from 56% (95% CI 45% to 67%) to at least 89% (95% CI 68% to 100%). In the UK, a hypothetical IOP threshold of >26 mm Hg, as a requirement for IOP-only referrals, would reduce IOP-only referrals by 44%, while not missing any definite glaucoma cases.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of referrals was poor in the UK and the other countries. Requiring a combination of criteria and raising the IOP threshold for IOP-only referrals are needed to cut waste in clinical care. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic Tests/investigation; Epidemiology; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure; Optic Nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774936     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of glaucoma referral letter for quality and accuracy among patients referred to a tertiary eye care center.

Authors:  Prasanna Venkataraman; Premanand Chandran; Mohamed Faheem; Vinoth Arunaachalam; Nabeed Aboobacker; Ganesh V Raman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Effectiveness of Elevated Intraocular Pressure as a Criterion for Glaucoma Referral After 6 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Andreas G Nilsson; Dorothea Peters
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-16

3.  A prospective study on effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referrals by optometric practitioners in Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Landgren; Dorothea Peters
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.761

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.