Literature DB >> 28774851

A Prospective Study of Chin Bone Graft Harvesting for Unilateral Maxillary Alveolar Cleft During Mixed Dentition.

AliReza Shirzadeh1, Amin Rahpeyma2, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The chin is a common donor site for alveolar cleft bone grafting. The amount of bone available at this site can be limited, because conservative harvesting with mixed dentition must consider the incisive nerve, the unerupted mandibular canine, and the integrity of the inferior mandibular border.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with nonsyndromic unilateral alveolar cleft in the mixed dentition stage were selected for this study. The volume of bone obtained from the mandibular symphysis (symphysis menti), degree of alteration in lower lip sensation, anterior tooth vitality, remaining bone in the alveolar cleft, and bone defects at the donor site 1 year after surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. The mean volume of bone harvested from the symphysis was 2.1 mL (range, 1.6 to 2.3 mL). For all cases, the bone volume harvested from the symphysis was insufficient to fill the alveolar cleft defect, and allograft had to be added to completely fill the cleft. Allograft was admixed in the range of 0.5 to 1 mL with autogenous bone harvested from the mandible. Lower lip sensation and vitality of the anterior teeth of the mandible were within the normal range 1 year after surgery in all cases. Fourteen of 18 patients (77.8%) had normal bone height or bone height at least three fourths of the expected height in the grafted alveolar cleft after 1 year; only 10% of the defect remained in the mandible.
CONCLUSION: The amount of bone yielded by conservative monocortical bone harvest from the mandibular symphysis during the mixed dentition stage for unilateral alveolar cleft bone grafting is not sufficient in volume and should be mixed with allograft. However, donor site morbidity is low with this approach.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774851     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients.

Authors:  Bijan Movahedian Attar; Parisa Soltani; Davood Davari; Mojdeh Mehdizadeh
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis.

Authors:  Basel Mahardawi; Kiatanant Boonsiriseth; Verasak Pairuchvej; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Classification of the journal category "oral surgery" in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions.

Authors:  Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Mandibular Ramus Cortical Tenting Graft and Particulate Allograft in the Management of Unilateral Alveolar Cleft.

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec

5.  Will Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Apnea/Hypopnea Index Be Corrected Following Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction?

Authors:  Sahand Samieirad; Alireza Khoshsirat; Fariba Rezaeetalab; Vajiheh Mianbandi; Elahe Tohidi; Majid Eshghpour
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.