Andrew J Durnford1, Jonathan Hempenstall2, Ahmed R Sadek2, Jonathan Duffill2, Nijaguna Mathad2, John Millar3, Owen C Sparrow2, Diederik O Bulters2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: adurnford@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Neuroradiology, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes following occlusion of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) are poorly understood and are based on small series reporting predominantly short-term outcomes. The degree and duration of improvement remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed long-term outcomes following occlusion in a cohort of patients with SDAVF. METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study of patients with SDAVF identified from a prospective database. Outcomes were assessed using a modified Aminoff and Logue Disability (ALD) Scale, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and patient-reported outcomes at presentation and long-term follow-up. Both angiographic recanalization and idiopathic functional recurrence rates were calculated. RESULTS: Of the total of 67 patients with SAVDF identified, 59 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Fifty-seven of these 59 (97%) underwent occlusion. Twenty-two patients underwent initial embolization; 12 were occluded. Two patients recanalized. Eleven patients underwent surgery after attempted embolization; 10 were occluded. Thirty-seven patients treated by surgery only were occluded. The median duration of follow-up was 63 months (range, 12-240 months). After occlusion, the ALD gait and urinary scores improved by a median of 1 point. Although the median mRS score was unchanged, 49% of the patients experienced improvement, most by 1 point. There was no difference between the patients occluded by embolization or surgery, but those requiring both approaches had worse gait and urinary scores (P = 0.005 and 0.03, respectively). The duration of symptoms by itself had no effect on outcomes (P = 0.61). Following occlusion, 5 patients experienced an idiopathic late functional deterioration. Of 16 patients presenting with paraplegia, 13 (81%) improved, with a median mRS improvement of 1 point. CONCLUSIONS: Following occlusion, patients with SDAVF experienced a modest improvement in symptoms, most commonly by 1 point on the ALD scale. Idiopathic late deterioration was seen in 9.1% of patients.
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes following occlusion of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) are poorly understood and are based on small series reporting predominantly short-term outcomes. The degree and duration of improvement remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed long-term outcomes following occlusion in a cohort of patients with SDAVF. METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study of patients with SDAVF identified from a prospective database. Outcomes were assessed using a modified Aminoff and Logue Disability (ALD) Scale, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and patient-reported outcomes at presentation and long-term follow-up. Both angiographic recanalization and idiopathic functional recurrence rates were calculated. RESULTS: Of the total of 67 patients with SAVDF identified, 59 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Fifty-seven of these 59 (97%) underwent occlusion. Twenty-two patients underwent initial embolization; 12 were occluded. Two patients recanalized. Eleven patients underwent surgery after attempted embolization; 10 were occluded. Thirty-seven patients treated by surgery only were occluded. The median duration of follow-up was 63 months (range, 12-240 months). After occlusion, the ALD gait and urinary scores improved by a median of 1 point. Although the median mRS score was unchanged, 49% of the patients experienced improvement, most by 1 point. There was no difference between the patients occluded by embolization or surgery, but those requiring both approaches had worse gait and urinary scores (P = 0.005 and 0.03, respectively). The duration of symptoms by itself had no effect on outcomes (P = 0.61). Following occlusion, 5 patients experienced an idiopathic late functional deterioration. Of 16 patients presenting with paraplegia, 13 (81%) improved, with a median mRS improvement of 1 point. CONCLUSIONS: Following occlusion, patients with SDAVF experienced a modest improvement in symptoms, most commonly by 1 point on the ALD scale. Idiopathic late deterioration was seen in 9.1% of patients.