| Literature DB >> 28774638 |
Renata Assis Castro1, Manuella Nóbrega Dourado2, Jaqueline Raquel de Almeida3, Paulo Teixeira Lacava4, André Nave5, Itamar Soares de Melo6, João Lucio de Azevedo1, Maria Carolina Quecine3.
Abstract
Mangroves are ecosystems located in the transition zone between land and sea that serve as a potential source of biotechnological resources. Brazil's extensive coast contains one of the largest mangrove forests in the world (encompassing an area of 25,000km2 along all the coast). <span class="Species">Endophytic bacteria were isolated from the following three plant species: Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa and Avicennia nitida. A large number of these isolates, 115 in total, were evaluated for their ability to fix nitrogen and solubilize phosphorous. Bacteria that tested positive for both of these tests were examined further to determine their level of indole acetic acid production. Two strains with high indole acetic acid production were selected for use as inoculants for reforestation trees, and then the growth of the plants was evaluated under field conditions. The bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens (strain MCR1.10) had a low phosphorus solubilization index, while this index was higher in the other strain used, Enterobacter sp. (strain MCR1.48). We used the reforestation tree Acacia polyphylla. The results indicate that inoculation with the MCR1.48 endophyte increases Acacia polyphylla shoot dry mass, demonstrating that this strain effectively promotes the plant's growth and fitness, which can be used in the seedling production of this tree. Therefore, we successfully screened the biotechnological potential of endophyte isolates from mangrove, with a focus on plant growth promotion, and selected a strain able to provide limited nutrients and hormones for in plant growth.Entities:
Keywords: Endophytic bacteria; IAA; Phosphorus and plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28774638 PMCID: PMC5790640 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Identification and evaluation of in vitro tests for plant growth promoting bacteria isolated from branches of mangrove plants.
| Isolate | Plant host | Location | Identification | IAA (μg mL−1) | Phosphate (P) solubilization index (SI) | Nitrogen fixation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBA2.21 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 31.2d | 8.0c | + | ||
| MBA2.18 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 27.6d | 4.2e | + | ||
| MBA2.16 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 33.7d | 3.4e | + | ||
| MBA2.4 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 34.3d | 4.8e | + | ||
| MBA2.15 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 32.8d | 3.5e | + | ||
| MBR2.45 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 24.4d | 7.4d | + | ||
| MBR2.40 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 32.5d | 7.0d | + | ||
| MBR2.28 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 100.3d | 1.6f | + | ||
| MBR2.16 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 28.3d | 6.8d | + | ||
| MBR2.7 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 406.8b | 8.2c | + | ||
| MBR2.1 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 16.5d | 5.9d | + | ||
| MBR2.22 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 16.4d | 8.2c | + | ||
| MBR2.29 | Industrial contaminated (Bertioga) | 443.2b | 6.5d | + | ||
| MBIA2.42 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 55.4d | 3.6e | + | ||
| MBIA2.40 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 48.7d | 3.8e | + | ||
| MBIA2.34 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 204.2c | 10.2b | + | ||
| MBIA2.35 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 27.8d | 8.5c | + | ||
| MBIA2.43 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 55.6d | 2.6f | + | ||
| MBIL2.38 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 56.8d | 2.4f | + | ||
| MBIL2.63 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 386.6b | 5.6e | + | ||
| MBIL2.47 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 422.7b | 11.2b | + | ||
| MBIL2.64 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 188.6c | 8.4c | + | ||
| MBIL2.51 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 21.2d | 6.0d | + | ||
| MBIL2.46 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 220.4c | 9.8b | + | ||
| MBIR2.24 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 27.6d | 6.2d | + | ||
| MBIR2.2 | Oil Spill contamination (Bertioga) | 34.8d | 3.6e | + | ||
| MCA2.42 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 38.5d | 2.6f | + | ||
| MCL2.66 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 513.9a | 13.7a | + | ||
| MCL2.65 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 573.9a | 11.2b | + | ||
| MCL2.68 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 75.4d | 1.2f | + | ||
| MCA2.20 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 86.1d | 1.2f | + | ||
| MCR1.48 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 540a | 11.1b | + | ||
| MCR1.23 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 477.1b | 9.0lc | + | ||
| MCR1.10 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 441.8b | 6.5d | + | ||
| MCR2.39 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 32.4d | 4.4e | + | ||
| MCR2.29 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 601.7a | 8.2c | + | ||
| MCR2.51 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 402.5b | 2.1f | + | ||
| MCR2.33 | Uncontaminated (Cananéias) | 124.8c | 6.8d | + |
In a column, values with the same letter do not differ at a 5% significance level (Scott Knott test).
The effect of soil inoculation of endophytic mangrove bacteria on A. polyphylla after 60 days following inoculation.
| Treatment | Isolate | Shoot dry mass (g) | Root dry mass (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 (adding only water) | – | 0.38 ± 0.04 b | 0.61 ± 0.17ab |
| Treatment 2 (adding fertilizer) | – | 0.43 ± 0.09ab | 0.58 ± 0.25b |
| Treatment 3 (inoculating MCR1.10) | 0.32 ± 0.05b | 0.49 ± 0.16b | |
| Treatment 4 (inoculating MCR1.48) | 0.50 ± 0.06a | 0.82 ± 0.53a | |
| Treatment 5 (inoculating MCR1.10 + MCR1.48) | MCR1.10 and MCR1.48 | 0.43 ± 0.07ab | 0.65 ± 0.20ab |
| Average | – | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.62 ± 0.25 |
In a column, values with the same letter do not differ at a 5% significance level (Tukey test).
Fig. 1Monjoleiro roots under different treatments: (A) Treatment 1 (addition of only water); (B) Treatment 2 (addition of fertilizer); (C) Treatment 3 (inoculation of Pseudomonas fluorescens MCR1.10); (D) Treatment 4 (inoculation of Enterobacter sp. MCR1.48).