Literature DB >> 28774548

Safety and efficiency of oocyte vitrification.

Neelke De Munck1, Gábor Vajta2.   

Abstract

As the oocyte is the starting point for a new life, artificial reproductive technology (ART) techniques should not affect the (ultra) structural and functional integrity, or the developmental competence. Oocyte vitrification -one of the most significant achievements in human ART during the past decade- should therefore be a safe and efficient technique. This review discusses the principles and developments of the existing and future techniques, applications possibilities and safety concerns. The broad range of vitrification media and devices that are currently available, show differences in their effects on the oocyte ultrastructure and preimplantation development. It is not yet fully decided whether this has an influence on the obstetric and neonatal outcome, since only limited information is available with different media and devices. For autologous oocytes, the obstetric and neonatal outcomes appear promising and comparable to pregnancies obtained with fresh oocytes. This however, is not the case for heterologous fresh or vitrified oocytes, where the immunological foreign foetus induces adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Besides the oocyte vitrification process itself, the effect of multiple stimulations (for oocyte banking or for oocyte donors), seems to influence the possibility to develop gynaecological cancers further in life. Automated vitrification/warming should offer a consistent, cross-contamination free process that offers the highest safety level for the users. They should also produce more consistent results in survival, development and clinical pregnancies between different IVF clinics.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774548     DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  9 in total

1.  Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18

2.  Expansion and herniation: evaluation of the best pregnancy rate predictor after quarter laser assisted hatching in frozen blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Caroline Brogliato; Janaína Romanini; Caroline Z Berton; Claudia H Suganuma; Laura T Vellez; Ivan H Yoshida; Caio P Barbosa
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Modulation of P2Y2 receptors in bovine cumulus oocyte complexes: effects on intracellular calcium, zona hardening and developmental competence.

Authors:  E Fonseca; P Mesquita; C C Marques; M C Baptista; J Pimenta; J E Matos; G Soveral; R M L N Pereira
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.765

4.  Blastocyst mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is not affected by oocyte vitrification: a sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Ana Arnanz; Neelke De Munck; Aşina Bayram; Ahmed El-Damen; Andrea Abdalla; Ibrahim ElKhatib; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Gemma Fabozzi; Roberta Venturella; Roberta Maggiulli; Rossella Mazzilli; Susanna Ferrero; Antonio Palagiano; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  The effect of vitrification after warming on the expressions of p38, CDK1, and cyclin B in immature goat oocytes followed by in vitro maturation.

Authors:  A A Muhammad Nur Kasman; Budi Santoso; Widjiati Widjiati
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-10-10

7.  Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation.

Authors:  Marjan Van Reckem; Christophe Blockeel; Maryse Bonduelle; Andrea Buysse; Mathieu Roelants; Greta Verheyen; Herman Tournaye; Frederik Hes; Florence Belva
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-19

8.  Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method.

Authors:  Dai Zhou; Xing-Ming Wang; Rui-Xue Li; Yi-Ze Wang; Yuan-Chi Chao; Zhi-Zhong Liu; Zeng-Hui Huang; Hong-Chuan Nie; Wen-Bing Zhu; Yue-Qiu Tan; Li-Qing Fan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Cancer fertility preservation: a report from a Brazilian social program.

Authors:  Caroline Z Berton; Caroline Brogliato; Ivan H Yoshida; Laura T Vellez; Claudia H Suganuma; Emerson B Cordts; Gabriel S Conceição; Caio P Barbosa
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.