Literature DB >> 28774527

Optical coherence tomography angiography artifacts in retinal pigment epithelial detachment.

Ricardo N Louzada1, Talisa E de Carlo2, Mehreen Adhi2, Eduardo A Novais3, Mary K Durbin4, Emily Cole2, Mark Lane5, Omid Moghimi6, Malvika Arya6, Marco Bonini Filho6, Andre J Witkin6, Caroline R Baumal6, Marcos Ávila7, Jay S Duker6, Nadia K Waheed8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) reflectance artifacts secondary to retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED).
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
METHODS: Four eyes from 4 subjects were included. Three presented with RPED and 1 eye was a normal control. Two eyes diagnosed with RPED and the normal eye were evaluated using en face OCTA centred at the fovea acquired using the RTVue XR Avanti (Optovue Inc). In the third eye with RPED, OCTA imaging was performed using a CIRRUS 5000 prototype modified to do OCTA imaging on a spectral domain OCT platform provided by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. The segmented OCTA angiograms were overlaid to determine if the flow patterns seen at the edge of the RPEDs were due to reflectance from the inner retinal vessels, also known as "decorrelation tails."
RESULTS: OCTA projection artifacts were noted when segmentation lines intersected with the boundary of the RPED. The overlaid segmented OCTA from the 3 RPED eyes imaged using each system revealed the same vasculature pattern at the edges of the RPED as that of the inner retina, demonstrating the "decorrelation tails" artifact, which caused the RPED to appear as a bright ring on the segmented OCTA.
CONCLUSIONS: OCTA images are susceptible to various known artifacts. This series describes the impact of the projection artifact seen at the edges of an RPED that simulates appearance of flow but is actually due to reflectance of the inner retinal vasculature on the RPED.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774527     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  6 in total

1.  Prevalences of segmentation errors and motion artifacts in OCT-angiography differ among retinal diseases.

Authors:  J L Lauermann; A K Woetzel; M Treder; M Alnawaiseh; C R Clemens; N Eter; Florian Alten
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Pasha Anvari; Maryam Ashrafkhorasani; Abbas Habibi; Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Analysis of Foveal Microvascular Abnormalities in Diabetic Retinopathy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography with Projection Artifact Removal.

Authors:  Lun Liu; Weili Bao; Chengyang Hu; Yajing Xu; Bingying Zhao; Jie Zheng; Lingling Fan; Yehuan Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Pseudoflow with OCT Angiography in Eyes with Hard Exudates and Macular Drusen.

Authors:  Kirk K Hou; Adrian Au; Amir H Kashani; K Bailey Freund; Srinivas R Sadda; David Sarraf
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Projection resolved optical coherence tomography angiography to distinguish flow signal in retinal angiomatous proliferation from flow artifact.

Authors:  Alaa E Fayed; Amani A Fawzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Choriocapillaris Vascular Density Changes in Patients with Drusen: Cross-Sectional Study Based on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; George Theodossiadis; Dimitrios Panagiotidis; Paraskevi Pousoulidi; Panagiotis Theodossiadis
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-01-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.